zimoun writes:
>
> It will be interesting to know what FSF licensing will say.
>
Indeed, this may need to be opened on the FSDG mailing list.
--
Brett M. Gilio
https://brettgilio.com
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:12:45AM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Proprietary software companies wishing to use or incorporate Covered
> Software within their programs must contact Licensor to purchase a
> separate license. Open source developers who wish to incorporate parts
> of Cov
Hi Marius,
On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 00:13, Marius Bakke wrote:
> > This is definitely not a consistent license for us.
>
> Having re-read the original text (without the annotations), the thing
> that stands out is:
>
> Proprietary software companies wishing to use or incorporate Covered
> Soft
Marius Bakke writes:
> Having re-read the original text (without the annotations), the thing
> that stands out is:
>
> Proprietary software companies wishing to use or incorporate Covered
> Software within their programs must contact Licensor to purchase a
> separate license. Open source de
Brett Gilio writes:
> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>> ...I'm fairly certain this is not an acceptable license for Guix, or
>> free software distributions in general.
>>
>
> This is definitely not a consistent license for us.
Having re-read the original text (without the annotations), the thing
that
Marius Bakke writes:
>
> ...I'm fairly certain this is not an acceptable license for Guix, or
> free software distributions in general.
>
This is definitely not a consistent license for us.
> So I think we should revert the license change, as well as the update
> to 7.90 which introduced the new
