Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> Hello,
>
> core-updates is still in a pretty bad state.
>
> [...]
>
> A short summary of what is at least broken:
>
> [...]
> (2) Source files have been in-place replaced upstream with a lot of packages
> (see my bug report about the topic). fldigi has such a
Hi Danny,
> (3) libusb-for-axoloti build failure (guix build axoloti-patcher-next)
This has been fixed in 1daedaa8646696783c88553e03035d547fd001ca.
> (5) download failed
> "https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/src/contrib/DelayedArray_0.16.1.tar.gz;
> 404 "Not Found"
This was fixed
Hello,
core-updates is still in a pretty bad state.
I'd be glad to merge Raghav's patches (which he already reworked to be current
for core-updates!) to core-updates--but right now, Guix packages don't build
BEFORE or after applying these patches to core-updates.
Please, let's do something
Hi Ricardo!
Thanks for the update!
Also, then reason GNOME work got messed up is that, in wip-desktop, [1]
I was not just working gnome packages, but also its dependencies [2]
Work involved not just updates, but also improvements. This kinda
complicated the "update stuff" norm.
I think
Raghav Gururajan writes:
> Hi Ricardo!
>
>> I don’t know if anyone is working on it right now, though. I was told
>> months ago that Raghav Gururajan was working on GNOME upgrades as part
>> of the wip-desktop branch, but my occasional questions for a status
>> upgrade have gone unanswered.
On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 03:18 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Hi Léo,
Hello!
> I appreciate your recent work on Guix security. Thank you for that.
Very happy to catch up there as well for my own usage of GNU Guix as
well!
> Can you please substantiate this? What vulnerabilities do you know
> of,
Am 11.03.21 um 09:08 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
Léo Le Bouter writes:
I must come to the conclusion that using GNOME 3.34 in GNU Guix right
now is just straight out insecure. I would advise we either, get rid of
GNOME, backport all individual security patches (they can be
numerous..), or
Hi Ricardo!
I don’t know if anyone is working on it right now, though. I was told
months ago that Raghav Gururajan was working on GNOME upgrades as part
of the wip-desktop branch, but my occasional questions for a status
upgrade have gone unanswered. Raghav, please correct me if I’m
mistaken.
Hi Léo,
I appreciate your recent work on Guix security. Thank you for that.
Léo Le Bouter writes:
> I must come to the conclusion that using GNOME 3.34 in GNU Guix right
> now is just straight out insecure. I would advise we either, get rid of
> GNOME, backport all individual security patches
Léo Le Bouter writes:
> I must come to the conclusion that using GNOME 3.34 in GNU Guix right
> now is just straight out insecure. I would advise we either, get rid of
> GNOME, backport all individual security patches (they can be
> numerous..), or upgrade GNOME to latest and keep up over
10 matches
Mail list logo
