Hello,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> That form then takes you to a page to submit the review. This can be
> done through the mailto link, or by following the manual
> instructions. Of course people using other ways of interacting with
> debbugs can also just add the reviewed-looks-good usertag
Christopher Baines writes:
> I've been reviewing the list of ideas on and around QA ([1]) recently,
> and got thinking again about how to support people without commit access
> reviewing patches. Obviously you don't need commit access to review
> patches, but where I think we need some process
Hi,
There are only two hard things in Computer Science…
On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 at 09:19, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> Discussing about idea, would it be possible that the QA infrastructure
>>> automatically send a message to Debbugs for tagging? For example, the
>>> usertag ’qa-ok’ or whatever
On 2023-09-06, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Simon Tournier writes:
>> On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 16:55, Christopher Baines wrote:
>>
>>> Once we know what tags to use, I can have the QA frontpage do something
>>> similar to the "Mark as moreinfo" links, so it's easy to just click a
>>> button then send
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 22:47, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Well, using emacs-debbugs and then
>>
>> C-u M-x debbugs-gnu-usertags guix-patches RET
>>
>> the list of usertags is:
>>
>> guix-patches for-core-updates
>> guix-patches reviewed-looks-good
>>
>> And if instead of
Hi Simon, Chris,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Chris, all,
>
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 16:55, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>> Once we know what tags to use, I can have the QA frontpage do something
>> similar to the "Mark as moreinfo" links, so it's easy to just click a
>> button then send the
Hi Chris, all,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 16:55, Christopher Baines wrote:
> Once we know what tags to use, I can have the QA frontpage do something
> similar to the "Mark as moreinfo" links, so it's easy to just click a
> button then send the email to change the state of a issue.
That’s cool!
Hi Felix,
On Wed, 06 Sep 2023 at 12:01, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and
the GNU System distribution." wrote:
> Usually, helpful reviews come from people with more experience. In
> your system they come from folks with less. That seems upside down to
> me.
Well, I think we are
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 11:39 AM Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> I don't want to make reviewing changes more difficult, and I think
> setting up more people with commit access and continuing the trend that
> it's mostly people with commit access that review changes would increase
> the
Felix Lechner writes:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:47 AM Christopher Baines wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we can use debbugs tags for this?
>
> Instead of pushing people into reviews and then again making the same
> committers a bottleneck, I would offer some entry-level contributors
> commit rights but
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:47 AM Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> Maybe we can use debbugs tags for this?
Instead of pushing people into reviews and then again making the same
committers a bottleneck, I would offer some entry-level contributors
commit rights but require that they obtain
11 matches
Mail list logo
