Hi,
I had missed that message.
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Another thing that comes to mind: would it make sense to mention ‘guix
>> graph’ in the part where you pipe the output of ‘guix show’ to ‘recsel’,
>> etc.?
>
> Forgot that one, sorry. Yes, it would make
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>> Perfect, thanks! I had to move files where Haunt expects them, and to
>> make the table pure ASCII because guile-commonmark doesn’t support HTML
>> nor tables, but here we are:
>>
>> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/reproducible-computations-with-guix/
>>
Hi Ludo,
> Perfect, thanks! I had to move files where Haunt expects them, and to
> make the table pure ASCII because guile-commonmark doesn’t support HTML
> nor tables, but here we are:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/reproducible-computations-with-guix/
>
Hello!
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>> You can post a patch against the guix-artwork.git repo here when you’re
>> ready.
>
> Here it comes !
Perfect, thanks! I had to move files where Haunt expects them, and to
make the table pure ASCII because guile-commonmark doesn’t support HTML
nor tables, but
Hello!
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>> Minor comments:
>>
>> • You write “Build systems are packages as well”. This could be
>> slightly misleading: build systems are (1) a set of packages, and
>> (2) a build procedure. Dunno if it makes sense to clarify that.
>
> Maybe I got something
Hi Konrad
Konrad Hinsen writes:
[...]
> Maybe I got something wrong, but I think I described this as you say
> (please check!). Quote:
>
> Build systems are pieces of Guile code that are part of Guix. But this
> Guile code is only a shallow layer orchestrating invocations of other
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Another thing that comes to mind: would it make sense to mention ‘guix
> graph’ in the part where you pipe the output of ‘guix show’ to ‘recsel’,
> etc.?
Forgot that one, sorry. Yes, it would make sense, though I'd place it a
bit later in the text. But I'd have to
Hi Ludo, Simon, and GIovanni,
Thanks for your feedback !
> Minor comments:
>
> • You write “Build systems are packages as well”. This could be
> slightly misleading: build systems are (1) a set of packages, and
> (2) a build procedure. Dunno if it makes sense to clarify that.
Maybe
Hello,
kudos for the great article!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
> The format we use is Markdown fed to Haunt:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/guix-artwork.git/tree/website/posts
>
> (which is sad because your Org file with Babel sessions is much nicer…).
> I think Pierre had
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 17:59, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> • In the ‘guix pack’ example, you could perhaps omit all the -S flags
> except for /bin, and mention ‘--save-provenance’.
I am the culprit.
The invocation of "guix pack -f docker" is not clear to me. So
basically, I
Another thing that comes to mind: would it make sense to mention ‘guix
graph’ in the part where you pipe the output of ‘guix show’ to ‘recsel’,
etc.?
Ludo’.
Hi Konrad,
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> Here is a first complete draft:
>
>
> https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/blob/master/reproducibility-with-guix.org
>
> Feedback welcome, be it by mail or as issues on GitHub.
I’ve read it entirely and I think it’s perfect. It’s a
Hi Konrad,
Thank you! It is very interesting!!
Below questions.
And suggestions which I can Pull-Request with Github. :-)
Hope it is readable: indented text is your text; non-indented one is question.
Cheers,
simon
--
#+TITLE: Reproducible computations with Guix
#+STARTUP:
13 matches
Mail list logo
