Hi Rovanion,
Rovanion Luckey writes:
>> The package description reads as:
>>
>>This package provides a small sample of UTF-8 locales mostly useful
>>in test environments.
>>
>
> While true does not change that the name is, in my opinion, misleading.
>
>
>> Perhaps it should simply be
> The package description reads as:
>
>This package provides a small sample of UTF-8 locales mostly useful
>in test environments.
>
While true does not change that the name is, in my opinion, misleading.
> Perhaps it should simply be marked as a hidden package (not discoverable
> via
Hi Rovanion,
Rovanion Luckey writes:
> I prefer names to not be lying about what they are, despite any
> documentation. It is a UX problem if the user has to search the
> documentation for any given package name before installing it, just to make
> sure that it contains what it says on the can
I prefer names to not be lying about what they are, despite any
documentation. It is a UX problem if the user has to search the
documentation for any given package name before installing it, just to make
sure that it contains what it says on the can so to speak.
The name glibc-utf8-locales when
Hi Rovanion,
Rovanion Luckey writes:
> Hi,
> I have on different occasions had the issue of the package manager Guix
> hinting that locales were not installed or that GUIX_LOCPATH was not set,
> even though they were. Today I went to the bottom of the issue [0] and have
> found what in my
Hi,
I have on different occasions had the issue of the package manager Guix
hinting that locales were not installed or that GUIX_LOCPATH was not set,
even though they were. Today I went to the bottom of the issue [0] and have
found what in my opinion is the root cause:
Despite its name, the
