Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile

2023-02-06 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi! Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> There’s still much tweaking we can do, but the basics are in place, and >> I find it pretty cool. :-) If there are no objections, I’ll merge this >> branch into “main”. It’s going to be nice to have a dashboard to look >>

Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile

2023-02-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Ludovic Courtès skribis: > There’s still much tweaking we can do, but the basics are in place, and > I find it pretty cool. :-) If there are no objections, I’ll merge this > branch into “main”. It’s going to be nice to have a dashboard to look > at before the next release! Merged in

Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile

2023-01-29 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Hello, > (Speaking of which, I hereby ask fellow Guix hackers to voice any > concerns they may have regarding this use of project resources.) Please use project resources. Thank you. Kind regards, T G-R Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

Re: Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile

2023-01-29 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Ludo' On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 9:37 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > I hereby ask fellow Guix hackers to voice any > concerns they may have regarding this use of project resources. I am not a Guix hacker (although maybe every user is one too) and, as a newbie, I cannot speak for the group but

Resurrecting top-notch continuous integration for Guile

2023-01-29 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guilers! (And hello Guix—that’s about an interesting use case. :-)) Back in 2009, together with Rob Vermaas of NixOS, we set up continuous integration for Guile (among other GNU packages), using Nix coupled with Hydra, its continuous integration (CI) system: