Pjotr Prins writes:
> Ruby 1.8.7 is still being used. For me one of the selling points of
> GNU Guix is that we can retain older packages when they are still
> useful. The switch from Ruby 1.8 to 1.9 was quite intrusive and not
> all software made the switch (similar
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:15:04PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> In general though it is a shame to remove old packages, Guix seems
> well suited to keeping old software usable. Is there a more useful
> place for removed packages to go other than the trash? A collection
> of exported profiles
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Some of our ruby versions may need security updates.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248935
>
> Can someone who cares about ruby please investigate?
This particular issue is definitely fixed in Ruby 2.2.4
Some of our ruby versions may need security updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248935
Can someone who cares about ruby please investigate?
Mark
Ruby 1.8.7 is still being used. For me one of the selling points of
GNU Guix is that we can retain older packages when they are still
useful. The switch from Ruby 1.8 to 1.9 was quite intrusive and not
all software made the switch (similar to the python 2 to 3
switch). Some people argue that the
On 09/01/16 10:15, Thompson, David wrote:
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote:
Some of our ruby versions may need security updates.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248935
Can someone who cares about ruby please investigate?
This particular