Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Thanks for the detailed study and summary! The conversation about the Rust Trademark policy issue has been happening on several mailing lists and in different IRC channels. I decided to write a new summary that bringing it all together, adds new information and cleans

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 02:49:21PM -0400, Bone Baboon wrote: >> Contents: >> * Passive Approaches > > I definitely think a passive approach is best, unless the owners of the > Rust trademark are taking actions that preclude it. Have they given us > any reason to think that

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 02:49:21PM -0400, Bone Baboon wrote: > Contents: > * Passive Approaches I definitely think a passive approach is best, unless the owners of the Rust trademark are taking actions that preclude it. Have they given us any reason to think that we need to do something about

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

On 2021-06-12, Bone Baboon wrote: > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> Bone Baboon skribis: ... > There are several options for how to move forward with the issue of the > Rust Foundation trademark policy. > > # Passive Approaches ... > * Do nothing > ** Advantages > *** No action needed by Guix. >

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Bone Baboon skribis: > >> After reading further on the topic and receiving feedback I have written >> an update to my understanding of the Rust trademark policy. >> > > Thanks for the detailed

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Before triggering an alarm, I would check what major distros, and Debian > in particular, are doing about Rust; I have not heard of any concerns so > far. If the Rust trademark turns out to be a concern, distros should > try hard, collectively, to resolve it through

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

On Thu, 27 May 2021, Joshua Branson wrote: In terms of languages trying to be replacements for C: - Zig is one of the most famous ones, and will probably be the first C alternatives to reach 1.0. https://ziglang.org/ - Odin https://odin-lang.org/ - scopes which using S-expressions

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Scopes sure looks cool! Pj.

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Pjotr Prins writes: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:32:03PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> That’s a somewhat different topic. FWIW, I’m both excited at the idea >> of having a memory-safe replacement for C gaining momentum, and >> frightened by the prospects of Rust being this replacement, for

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Bone Baboon writes: > This is an article from Hyperbola about the Rust trademark. It claims > that Rust has a freedom issue. > > > I searched for this in the Guix bug and devel mailing list archive but > did not see it. > > I

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:32:03PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > That’s a somewhat different topic. FWIW, I’m both excited at the idea > of having a memory-safe replacement for C gaining momentum, and > frightened by the prospects of Rust being this replacement, for many > reasons including:

Re: Rust freedom issue claim

Hi, Bone Baboon skribis: > This is an article from Hyperbola about the Rust trademark. It claims > that Rust has a freedom issue. > (Side note: “freedom issue” is not a helpful term as it could mean all sorts of things.)

Rust freedom issue claim

This is an article from Hyperbola about the Rust trademark. It claims that Rust has a freedom issue. I searched for this in the Guix bug and devel mailing list archive but did not see it. I would like to know how others