Felix Lechner writes:
> > You could try invoking mount-file-system from (gnu build file-systems)
> > directly to try and narrow down what exactly is breaking.
> How would I go about doing that, please?
1. $ guix repl
2. Import the module with ,use (gnu build file-systems)
3. Call
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Jun 07 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> I did have to reboot
So did I. In fact, my issue is now that the file system fails to mount
on boot.
> You could try invoking mount-file-system from (gnu build file-systems)
> directly to try and narrow down what exactly is breaking.
How
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Tue, Apr 23 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
>
>> I submitted a patch for what I'm thinking at
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70542.
>
> I believe this stopped working for my NFS setup.
Interesting. It does still work with my CIFS/SMB share, so I
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Apr 23 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> I submitted a patch for what I'm thinking at
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70542.
I believe this stopped working for my NFS setup.
Kind regards
Felix
Hi Ludo!
> The other option would be to allow for symbols in the ‘dependencies’
> field, because it’s really the same thing. That would only require a
> new clause in the ‘dependency->shepherd-service-name’ procedure.
Personally I prefer separating requirements and dependencies.
Dependencies
Hi!
Richard Sent skribis:
> Before hacking away at this myself, I'd like to get other people's
> thoughts on the best way to proceed. Do others agree that (file-system)
> entries should support networked devices? Should this be transparent
> depending on the type, or require explicit
> P.S. The code above should read (requirements ...) in the plural.
inside shepherd there's a bit of anomaly, but it's called requirement in the
public API, and also in the guix side of the config; i.e. it's not plural.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Moderation in
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Apr 23 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> I submitted a patch [..] at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70542. If this
> winds up merged I believe your code could be rewritten [as]
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (file-system
>(device
Hi Felix,
> Someone once gave me this service [1] to mount a file-system declared
> with (mount? #f). [2] It's been working ever since.
Thanks! I know custom services can be made that can work on a
case-by-case basis. I was curious about the value of encapsulating that
logic within an
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Apr 22 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> NFS is allegedly supported
Someone once gave me this service [1] to mount a file-system declared
with (mount? #f). [2] It's been working ever since.
Kind regards
Felix
[1]
Hi Guix!
I wanted to ask the Guix community for their thoughts on improving the
support for adding networked file systems to an operating-system
declaration.
For some context, I started tackling adding CIFS support to file-system
declarations, but I've hit a snag. CIFS is a networked file
11 matches
Mail list logo
