Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as
>> quickly as we can.
>
> The latest core-updates evaluation is coming together [0], but there are
> still a few
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as
> quickly as we can.
The latest core-updates evaluation is coming together [0], but there are
still a few notable issues:
* Pandas is failing to build:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:35:31PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Libtiff failed the first build attempt when the upstream FTP server
> timed out. It has succeeded since then, but this will have caused a lot
> of dependent packages to fail.
>
> Should I "Restart all dependency failed builds" now?
Hi Hartmut,
> Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
>> There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without
>> the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is
>> read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this
>> in the
Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without
> the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is
> read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this
> in the next core-updates
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’ve started a new evaluation, let’s see what happens!
>
> We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as
> quickly as we can.
>
> Thanks, and happy new year where applicable! :-)
>
> Ludo’.
Hello Guix!
I’ve started a new evaluation, let’s see what happens!
We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as
quickly as we can.
Thanks, and happy new year where applicable! :-)
Ludo’.
Marius Bakke writes:
> Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>
>> I'd like to get the patch
>>
>> [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify
>> ".py" files in-place.
>>
>> into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think?
>
>
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> I'd like to get the patch
>
> [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py"
> files in-place.
>
> into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think?
We already have a substantial amount of Python changes
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> ‘core-updates’ is doing OK!
>
> https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates
>
> The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are
> nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader.
>
> What about starting a new
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 12:14:16 +0100
Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> I'd like to get the patch
>
> [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py"
> files in-place.
>
> into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think?
>
> If we don't do
I'd like to get the patch
[bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py"
files in-place.
into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think?
If we don't do it then a lot of Python programs (the ones who use
"console_scripts" in setup.py as they should) will
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 11:27:37AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> ‘core-updates’ is doing OK!
>
> https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates
>
> The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are
> nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader.
>
Hello Guix!
‘core-updates’ is doing OK!
https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates
The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are
nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader.
What about starting a new evaluation of all the packages now so we can
merge it
14 matches
Mail list logo