Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2018-01-20 Thread Kei Kebreau
Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as >> quickly as we can. > > The latest core-updates evaluation is coming together [0], but there are > still a few

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2018-01-17 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as > quickly as we can. The latest core-updates evaluation is coming together [0], but there are still a few notable issues: * Pandas is failing to build:

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2018-01-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:35:31PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > Libtiff failed the first build attempt when the upstream FTP server > timed out. It has succeeded since then, but this will have caused a lot > of dependent packages to fail. > > Should I "Restart all dependency failed builds" now?

Re: change to the wrap-program procedure (was: core-updates, let’s go!)

2018-01-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi Hartmut, > Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without >> the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is >> read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this >> in the

change to the wrap-program procedure (was: core-updates, let’s go!)

2018-01-02 Thread Hartmut Goebel
Am 31.12.2017 um 18:27 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > There’s also a change to the wrap-program procedure that does without > the shell wrappers and instead prepends a short Guile program, which is > read as a comment in the target language. It’s better to play with this > in the next core-updates

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2018-01-01 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 06:12:49PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > I’ve started a new evaluation, let’s see what happens! > > We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as > quickly as we can. > > Thanks, and happy new year where applicable! :-) > > Ludo’.

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2018-01-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix! I’ve started a new evaluation, let’s see what happens! We’ll have to stay focused in the coming days to fix everything as quickly as we can. Thanks, and happy new year where applicable! :-) Ludo’.

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Marius Bakke writes: > Danny Milosavljevic writes: > >> I'd like to get the patch >> >> [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify >> ".py" files in-place. >> >> into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think? > >

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Marius Bakke
Danny Milosavljevic writes: > I'd like to get the patch > > [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py" > files in-place. > > into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think? We already have a substantial amount of Python changes

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Marius Bakke
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > ‘core-updates’ is doing OK! > > https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates > > The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are > nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader. > > What about starting a new

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 12:14:16 +0100 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > I'd like to get the patch > > [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py" > files in-place. > > into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think? > > If we don't do

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
I'd like to get the patch [bug#29856] [PATCH core-updates] guix: python-build-system: Modify ".py" files in-place. into this core-updates cycle. What do you all think? If we don't do it then a lot of Python programs (the ones who use "console_scripts" in setup.py as they should) will

Re: core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 11:27:37AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello Guix! > > ‘core-updates’ is doing OK! > > https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates > > The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are > nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader. >

core-updates, let’s go!

2017-12-31 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Guix! ‘core-updates’ is doing OK! https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates The remaining issues are GCC 4.8 and 4.9 failing to build, which are nothing serious and left as an exercise to the reader. What about starting a new evaluation of all the packages now so we can merge it