Hi,
On mer., 17 avril 2024 at 05:21, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> I've just pushed, as b47ae1ecc43baaf726701ab2d2f810ecfaa75428,
Cool! Thank you for crossing the finish line.
Cheers,
simon
Hi everyone,
Apologies for the long delay on this.
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:07 PM, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to
> gcc-toolchain. Well, quoting the comment:
>
> ;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to
Hi,
I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to
gcc-toolchain. Well, quoting the comment:
;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to conveniently
;; install everything that we need, and (2) to make sure ld-wrapper comes
;; before Binutils' ld in
Hi Kaelyn,
Kaelyn via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> Thanks! A small side note: I have glibc in there mainly so ldd is available
> for debugging problems or getting new binaries working (I think the comment
> with it is a remnant of an older version of the manifest from before "-F" was
>
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, May 5th, 2023 at 8:59 PM, John Kehayias
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kaelyn,
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:45 PM, Kaelyn wrote:
>
> > --- Original Message ---
> > I wasn't sure the best place to share it, so I've attached my "run"
> > script for
Hi Kaelyn,
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:45 PM, Kaelyn wrote:
> --- Original Message ---
> I wasn't sure the best place to share it, so I've attached my "run"
> script for running the binary download of PolyMC in a container. It is
> both a shell script and a guix package manifest, and is
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, May 4th, 2023 at 9:50 PM, John Kehayias
wrote:
> > I have similar use cases of FHS containers to run binaries (primarily
> > games). I recently ran into the issue of gcc:lib going away and no
> > output from a visible package providing libstdc++. My
Hi all,
> I have similar use cases of FHS containers to run binaries (primarily
> games). I recently ran into the issue of gcc:lib going away and no
> output from a visible package providing libstdc++. My current
> workaround was to implement a replacement for specifications->manifest
> that
On 5/4/23 11:33 AM, Kaelyn wrote:
Regarding solutions, I would prefer to have libstdc++ in it's own package or
output rather than bundled into gcc-toolchain:out; it feels messy and against
the grain of isolating programs in containers if I have to make the gcc and g++
compilers available in
Hi again,
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:19 AM, John Kehayias wrote:
> Thanks for opening this and cc'ing; this has come up with some
> frequency on IRC, especially recently. In discussing there today, the
> current reasoning is that usually one will just call g++ which knows
> how to find
Hi,
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, May 4th, 2023 at 3:26 PM, John Kehayias
wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
>
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05 AM, Christopher Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the spam; Resending this without the bugs address, but with
> > the issue's address.
> >
>
Hi Christopher,
On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05 AM, Christopher Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Sorry for the spam; Resending this without the bugs address, but with
> the issue's address.
>
> Christopher Rodriguez writes:
>
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I noticed today that libstdc++.so.1 (and some others), which
Sorry for the spam; Resending this without the bugs address, but with
the issue's address.
Christopher Rodriguez writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
>
> Hello All,
>
> I noticed today that libstdc++.so.1 (and some others), which used to be
> part of gcc:lib, are not included in any of the
Hello All,
I noticed today that libstdc++.so.1 (and some others), which used to be
part of gcc:lib, are not included in any of the outputs of the
superceding `gcc-toolchain` package.
Is there another method for getting these needed shared libraries in a
guix system at this point? It's entirely
14 matches
Mail list logo
