ng0 skribis:
> My "problem", or rather the question I pose is: Does it make sense to
> adjust how the license is displayed? Like instead of "GPL 2" We'd display
> "GPL 2.0 only" and instead of "GPL 2+" (no example at hand to test if this
> is the current display) we'd display "GPL 2
Jelle Licht transcribed 2.3K bytes:
>
> ng0 writes:
>
> > I've just read this link:
> > https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/rms-article-for-claritys-sake-please-dont-say-licensed-under-gnu-gpl-2
> >
> > Full Quote:
> >
> >> In this article, For Clarity's Sake, Please Don't Say "Licensed
ng0 writes:
> I've just read this link:
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/rms-article-for-claritys-sake-please-dont-say-licensed-under-gnu-gpl-2
>
> Full Quote:
>
>> In this article, For Clarity's Sake, Please Don't Say "Licensed under GNU
>> GPL 2"!, Free Software Foundation
I've just read this link:
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/rms-article-for-claritys-sake-please-dont-say-licensed-under-gnu-gpl-2
Full Quote:
> In this article, For Clarity's Sake, Please Don't Say "Licensed under GNU GPL
> 2"!, Free Software Foundation president Richard Stallman (RMS) explains