Re: potluck status

Christopher Allan Webber skribis: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel >> writes: >> >>> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ >>> >>> Please think about an other name

Re: potluck status

Hello! Andy Wingo skribis: > Here is part of the documentation in that branch: > > 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ > Excellent, nicely written as usual! > With the release of Guile 2.2.2, I have re-enabled > https://guix-potluck.org. I also

Re: potluck status

Greets, Just a quick yes-and note: On Tue 02 May 2017 04:26, Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > Andy Wingo writes: >> & as for dev/testing/prod/etc -- I have no idea :) I'm not really an >> ops person, so I can only speculate, and anyone can do that

Re: potluck status

Andy Wingo writes: > I guess you would probably also want to to specify also a set of > active channels for a given guix command; e.g. "guix package > --channels=testing --install my-package". Being able to work with packages at the level of granularity of channels would be

Re: potluck status

Le Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:46:43 -0500, Christopher Allan Webber a écrit : > Andy Wingo writes: > > > On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel > > writes: > > > >> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: > >>> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix

Re: potluck status

Andy Wingo writes: > On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel > writes: > >> Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: >>> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ >> >> Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be >> common to native speakers but I

Re: potluck status

Hi :) On Fri 28 Apr 2017 15:41, Katherine Cox-Buday writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> With that I think I'd like to move to a "use" phase where I just sit >> back and see how people use the thing :) WDYT? > > I am very excited about this

Re: potluck status

I am personally happy with potluck, however collab has a similar group feeling to it. -H Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 28 Apr 2017, 14:46, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: I don't hold any strong opinions on the name, but in the interest of ideas: - guix quorum -

Re: potluck status

I don't hold any strong opinions on the name, but in the interest of ideas: - guix quorum - guix collab - guix confer - guix conjoin That's all I have for now :) -- Katherine

Re: potluck status

Andy Wingo writes: > With that I think I'd like to move to a "use" phase where I just sit > back and see how people use the thing :) WDYT? I am very excited about this functionality for all of the reasons you enumerated. I don't have any time at the moment, but I was (and

Re: potluck status

In the UK, We do potluck dinners, I also had one in Canada. Though I agree it's quite colloquial term, does one have to understand the reference to understand how to use the command on the CLI? -H Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On 28 Apr 2017, 13:58, Jan

Re: potluck status

Hartmut Goebel writes: > Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be > common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks. Potluck dish --even though it's English--- is a common word even in the Netherlands...possibly this is a European thing. I like the

Re: potluck status

On Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:42, Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: >> 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ > > Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be > common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks.

Re: potluck status

Hi, Am 28.04.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Andy Wingo: > 5.15 Invoking ‘guix potluck’ Please think about an other name for this command. "potlouk" may be common to native speakers but I never heard this word. Thanks. -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel |

potluck status

Hi! To recall, "guix potluck" is a packaging facility that is a decoupled from mainline Guix development. The latest patches are in wip-potluck, and a recent copy of the patches is here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26645 Here is part of the documentation in that branch: