Re: proposal for more options in gnu/services/networking.scm for blocklist

2016-02-06 Thread Nils Gillmann
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Nils Gillmann skribis: > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> Nils Gillmann skribis: >>> A first version for google I just came up with starts like the attached code. What do you

Re: proposal for more options in gnu/services/networking.scm for blocklist

2016-02-04 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nils Gillmann skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Nils Gillmann skribis: >> >>> A first version for google I just came up with starts like the attached >>> code. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> I would use it! (Although I use Tor

Re: proposal for more options in gnu/services/networking.scm for blocklist

2016-02-02 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nils Gillmann skribis: > A first version for google I just came up with starts like the attached > code. > > What do you think? I would use it! (Although I use Tor + Privoxy for most of my web browsing, so I would also need the black list there.) The only downside I see

proposal for more options in gnu/services/networking.scm for blocklist

2016-01-31 Thread Nils Gillmann
Some weeks when I first talked about GuixSD with someone who shares my dislike for facebook, they came up with this idea "Why stop at facebook with the block options?" Giving users who want to (and this is what it should be marked as and documented as) the choice to exclude most of the big