Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-xopen.

On 18/12/16 11:00, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: Marius, On 16/12/16 17:09, Marius Bakke wrote: Pypi archives are sometimes smaller than the raw sources Oh, I didn't know that. or otherwise "prepared", but I guess no inherent benefits. Good point. I can certainly see people relying too

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-xopen.

Marius, On 16/12/16 17:09, Marius Bakke wrote: > Pypi archives are sometimes smaller than the raw sources Oh, I didn't know that. > or otherwise "prepared", but I guess no inherent benefits. Good point. I can certainly see people relying too heavily on GitHub (and similar) tarball

Re: [PATCH] gnu: r: Update to 3.3.2

On 17/12/16 17:52, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Hi Raoul, good to see you here. On 17/12/16 03:16, Ra wrote: * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r): Update to 3.3.2. I successfully built R and all of its 243 dependencies on x86_64, and except for the previously failing shogun, all built successfully.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: star: Update to 2.5.2b.

On 17/12/16 23:28, Ben Woodcroft wrote: Hi, On 17/12/16 18:25, Ra wrote: --- gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for the patch. I pushed this as 'c9e9154e993f055a438e2e43518bbd0740aaaf24' after modifying the commit message and

Re: Back from the Reproducible Build Summit, 2nd edition

Hi Ludo! l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Here’s a report from the 2nd Reproducible Build Summit that took place > this week! > > > https://gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-build-summit-2nd-edition.html Thank you for sharing these notes. I see you mentioned some follow-up

[PATCH] Update emacs-org.

Hello, The following patch updates emacs-org to its latest version. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou0x80A93738 >From fef548e5b623fd182d3ea0acdb705b38fdf6d5d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Goaziou Date: Sat, 17 Dec

[PATCH] gnu: maxima: Update to 5.39.0.

This was supposed to be a simple version bump for Maxima, but it has come to my attention that Maxima hasn't built reproducibily for quite a while now (since version 5.36.1 according to my tests, possibly further). Is there any particular reason why? I can't seem to pinpoint the cause. From

Re: [PATCH] gnu: utox: Fix description.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:21:44PM +, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (utox): Fix description. Please re-submit this patch with the revised patches for c-toxcore, etc.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: utox: Update to 0.11.0.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:14:15PM +, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (utox): Update to 0.11.0. > [source]: Update source uri. > [build-system]: Change to cmake-build-system. > [arguments]: Remove previous content and disable tests, > add two new phases. > [inputs]: Remove

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add c-toxcore.

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:14:14PM +, ng0 wrote: > * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (c-toxcore): New variable. > +(version "0.1.0") I see a new release: https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/tree/v0.1.1 > +(source > + (origin > + (method url-fetch) > + (uri (string-append

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add asunder.

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:20:40AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: > * gnu/packages/cdrom.scm (asunder): New variable. Thanks! > +(home-page "http://www.littlesvr.ca/asunder/index.php;) I agree with the other reviewers about the home-page. > +(inputs `(("gtk+-2" ,gtk+-2) > +

Re: [PATCH] doc: Mention "guix pull" during installation.

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:38:02AM +0100, Petter wrote: > good experience because of this. Proposing a patch to add this to the > manual. Thanks for looking out for the new user experience, which one tends to forget as time passes :) > * doc/guix.texi (Proceeding with the Installation): Add

Re: [PATCH] gnu: tor: Recommend torsocks.

Hartmut Goebel writes: > Am 15.12.2016 um 11:37 schrieb ng0: >> -applications based on the TCP protocol.") >> +applications based on the TCP protocol. >> +To @code{torify} applications (to take measures to ensure that an >> application, >> +which has not been

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add asunder.

Am 17.12.2016 um 10:20 schrieb Chris Marusich: > +(home-page "http://www.littlesvr.ca/asunder/index.php;) I'd leave of the "index.php" here. Its uselass and ugly :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com

Back from the Reproducible Build Summit, 2nd edition

Hello GNU folks! Here’s a report from the 2nd Reproducible Build Summit that took place this week! https://gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-build-summit-2nd-edition.html Ludo’. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [PATCH] gnu: star: Update to 2.5.2b.

Hi, On 17/12/16 18:25, Ra wrote: --- gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for the patch. I pushed this as 'c9e9154e993f055a438e2e43518bbd0740aaaf24' after modifying the commit message and removing the extra precompiled binary it

Re: [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Add grub-efi.

> For anyone following along at home, I've attached the patches I'm using > for UEFI GuixSD. The latter two probably won't work properly on a > non-UEFI system, needs testing. Never mind the last part, 'guix system vm-image' works fine with these patches. signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: NetworkManager doesn't "Connect automatically"

Thomas Haller writes: > On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 01:38 -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Thank you for the quick response! >> >> Thomas Haller writes: >> >> > Did you build NetworkManager yourself? Is session-tracking properly >> > enabled

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add asunder.

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 01:20:40AM -0800, Chris Marusich wrote: +(define-public asunder + (package +(name "asunder") +(version "2.8") +(home-page "http://www.littlesvr.ca/asunder/index.php;) +(source (origin + (method url-fetch)

Re: [PATCH 3/6] file-systems: Suppress fsck status completion bar.

Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > > why not just use "fsck -t xxx" instead? It will filter out "-C" for > fscks which don't support it. I think pending a proper solution for handling fsck commands, offloading it to util-linux is a decent compromise. Ludo, WDYT?

Re: [PATCH 6/6] gnu: Add grub-efi.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Marius, > > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >> From 940c03c7dcddec019e27f6eb1470aeab4db57799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Marius Bakke >> Date: Thu, 20 Oct

Re: NetworkManager doesn't "Connect automatically"

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Following Andy’s advice I committed both with slightly-tweaked commit > logs. That’ll give lurkers out there an incentive to give it a try. > ;-) > > Thank you Chris! > > Ludo’. Thank you! When I find some time, I'll look into modifying the polkit rules

Add Asunder

The following email contains a patch for Asunder. I've tested it and verified that it works in GuixSD for ripping a CD to OGG files. (Note that you must be able to read the CD-ROM device file, e.g., by being a member of the cdrom group.) - Chris

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

I have committed 'emacs-guix' package, so after "guix pull" or if you use the git checkout, you may try it with: guix package -i emacs-guix Just make sure it has a priority over the elisp code from Guix. "M-x list-load-path-shadows" should help you to figure it out. Now a bit about the

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > It would be a great loss and a technical hindrance if guix.el was moved > out of Guix. I don???t want that to happen, so let me know what the > ransom should be! ;-) There shouldn't be any

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

Ricardo Wurmus (2016-12-16 01:37 +0100) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> Hello, I've been working on Emacs interface outside from the Guix repo >>> for some time, I mean I'm not going to maintain it inside Guix, sorry

[PATCH] gnu: star: Update to 2.5.2b.

--- gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm index 3e9c82f..1b6532b 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm @@ -4924,7

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

Ludovic Courtès (2016-12-15 18:39 +0100) wrote: > Hi Alex! > > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Hello, I've been working on Emacs interface outside from the Guix repo >> for some time, I mean I'm not going to maintain it inside Guix, sorry :-( >> >> The main reason, is, well,

Re: Emacs-Guix released outside from Guix

Ludovic Courtès (2016-12-16 17:44 +0100) wrote: > Howdy! > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> If you go through with the move please double check that the Guix >> sources are in a state that’s ready for release. It would be terrible >> to have a botched release. (Frankly, I’m a