Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2017-07-25 12:26 +0200) wrote:
>
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>>
> Now if one could pass a manifest or a system configuration to “guix
>
Hi Efraim,
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> modules separately. It seems to me that there are a large number of perl
> packages that
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> FWIW, I would like to see us work to eliminate all cyclic module
>>> dependencies in Guix, by splitting up our package modules as needed so
>>> that they
Hi Julian,
Julian Graham skribis:
> From 36b7b5e5c06cf1950ae37f6798dd2b6f9453eae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Julian Graham
> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 23:35:55 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.11.1.
>
> *
Alex Kost writes:
> Kyle Meyer (2017-07-25 21:40 -0400) wrote:
>
>> Marius Bakke writes:
>>
>>> Wait, isn't this what --pure is for? I haven't followed the
>>> discussion, but I would expect `guix environment` to *add* to my
>>> current profile, and use
Alex Kost writes:
> Hi, I've noticed that "guix weather" provides "--manifest" long option
> but not "-m" short option (as "guix package" does). Would it be better
> to add "-m" for consistency with "guix package"?
Yes, that would be good. I forgot to provide it when I
Alex Kost writes:
> Feng Shu (2017-07-26 20:44 +0800) wrote:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> [...]
>>> The rest (setting up the symlink) is a little less convenient though.
>>> See (guix scripts package) or the equivalent Emacs-Guix code for how
>>> this works.
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello,
>
> Open MPI retains references to GCC, GFortran, etc., which significantly
> increases its closure size.
My query about cycles from separating the lib output was from looking at
basically this. There should be a runtime package for
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Mes 0.9, representing 107
> commits over 5 weeks. Mescc now compiles to a surprisingly readable
> stage0 M1 macro assembler output format. Also, mescc can now compile a
> modified TinyCC into a running [mostly segfaulting]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> > to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> > modules
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>
> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be better
> > to revert the perl update and work on updating perl and all the perl
> > modules
On July 27, 2017 9:11:57 PM GMT+03:00, Leo Famulari wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi Efraim,
>>
>> Efraim Flashner skribis:
>>
>> > There's a lot of perl related build failures. Maybe it would be
>better
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::*
> modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I
> think we should rather find a way to fix them (I spent a bit of time on
> it but
That's very good news indeed! :)
I don't speak for the GNU Guix project itself, but here goes a
description on how I ended up being a package maker for GNU Guix:
For making package recipes, I mostly use knownledge about Scheme and
basics of build systems (no need to know each of the various
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:07:09PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Reverting is not an option at this point IMO. There are several Date::*
> > modules required by Biber that FTBFS and need an update, indeed, but I
> > think we
15 matches
Mail list logo