Re: 11/12: gnu: Add libuemf.

2020-06-02 Thread Caleb Ristvedt
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > apteryx pushed a commit to branch master > in repository guix. > > commit 3f1f98d9d8c4e7f5dfca921fe1957e4d53783e35 > Author: Maxim Cournoyer > AuthorDate: Tue Jan 28 01:21:24 2020 -0500 > > gnu: Add libuemf. > > * gnu/packages/image.scm (libuemf): New

Re: 01/03: gnu: ikiwiki: Revert to standard wrapper.

2020-06-02 Thread Christopher Baines
Christopher Baines writes: > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > >> pgarlick pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit a0362fdea9369b7927704e48cfc6c578213019ce >> Author: Paul Garlick >> AuthorDate: Thu May 28 10:34:40 2020 +0100 >> >> gnu: ikiwiki: Revert to standard

Re: 01/03: gnu: ikiwiki: Revert to standard wrapper.

2020-06-02 Thread Christopher Baines
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > pgarlick pushed a commit to branch master > in repository guix. > > commit a0362fdea9369b7927704e48cfc6c578213019ce > Author: Paul Garlick > AuthorDate: Thu May 28 10:34:40 2020 +0100 > > gnu: ikiwiki: Revert to standard wrapper. > > * gnu/packages/web.scm

Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

2020-06-02 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, On 02/06/2020 04:56, Chris Marusich wrote: Hopefully, you'll get identical results! You don't have to run "guix gc" if you don't want to, but doing so will increase the likelihood of catching nondeterminism issues propagated from dependencies (which seem unlikely, but you never know).

Can Emacs packages define their own EMACSLOADPATH in their open script?

2020-06-02 Thread Zhu Zihao
I use guix to manage different version of Emacs in a foreign distro. However, the Emacs package in the source will record its modification of EMACSLOADPATH in profile, which will cause conflict in different version of Emacs, and also conflict with Emacs in foreign distro. My idea is move the

Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

2020-06-02 Thread Jack Hill
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Vincent Legoll wrote: Hello, On 02/06/2020 04:56, Chris Marusich wrote: Hopefully, you'll get identical results! You don't have to run "guix gc" if you don't want to, but doing so will increase the likelihood of catching nondeterminism issues propagated from dependencies

Re: Guix mirrors

2020-06-02 Thread zimoun
Dear Tobias, On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 14:53, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > zimoun 写道: > > BTW, why such discussion happens on Guix sysadmins mailing list > > and > > not on guix-devel? > > Because that's where I sent a quick & dirty patch yonks ago. > There's also really not that much to

Re: 01/03: gnu: ikiwiki: Revert to standard wrapper.

2020-06-02 Thread Paul Garlick
Hi Chris, > I don't think there was ever a bug report for this, but I think I've > found the IRC conversation for context: > > http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2017-10-17.log#203630 Thank you for this link and taking a look at this patch. I have been adding the missing inputs to ikiwiki. In

Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

2020-06-02 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Chris! Chris Marusich writes: > Hi everyone! > > Thanks to Léo's help, as of commit > 8159ce1970d91567468cf1bacac313099a009d2a, the master branch now contains > all the changes necessary to cross-compile powerpc64-linux bootstrap > binaries. I've done this without substitutes by running the

Icedove package needs update, following IceCat 68.9.0 update.

2020-06-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi, I just pushed the IceCat-68.9.0 security update to the master branch of Guix, along with a graft for NSS. However, I just noticed that we now have Icedove in Guix, and that it's based on 'icecat-source'. This is all good and proper (kudos to all who worked on it!), but unfortunately I

Re: branch staging updated: gnu: ghc-7: Clean up package definition.

2020-06-02 Thread Marius Bakke
guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > niedzejkob pushed a commit to branch staging > in repository guix. > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/staging by this push: > new f20d1cf gnu: ghc-7: Clean up package

Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

2020-06-02 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Vincent, Jack, and Maxim, Thank you for the quick replies! OK, so gcc differs for each of us: * Chris: 8aca7f332a1ba8e3c2225c161a7545b0a04ddd690d164dc97afee9c9ea067b0c49bc155e9f06d285c22e24cdd16d91e59730af5f1dd9efcda13a26bede5948a2 * Vincent:

Re: Downloader for "wrapped" tarbar?

2020-06-02 Thread Marius Bakke
Hartmut Goebel writes: > Hi, > > was just written in another mail, I'm currently working on a > erlang/rebar build system. This includes an importer from hex.pm, a > package repository for elixir and erlang packages. (Since this is build > into rebar3 I assume it what PyPI is for Python and CPAN

Re: branch staging updated: gnu: ghc-7: Clean up package definition.

2020-06-02 Thread Jakub Kądziołka
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:22:31PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > > > niedzejkob pushed a commit to branch staging > > in repository guix. > > > > The following commit(s) were added to

Re: branch staging updated: gnu: ghc-7: Clean up package definition.

2020-06-02 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 22:19, Marius Bakke wrote: > Also, we'd have to bother the Savannah admins every time we 'freeze' a > branch. However, we could ask to extend the list of tags used by Debbugs. For example, by adding the tag 'release-critical' or any other well-chosen. > Another

Re: [PATCH] Add Tor client only package definition

2020-06-02 Thread Andre Batista
I need to stop thinking of cars and cdrs. It didn't even try to compile again, just gave me the address on the store, so I'm guessing guile is smart enough to see it's equivalent and does not care at all. I'll be less clumsy next time around. --- --- a/gnu/packages/tor.scm 2020-06-03

Re: Icedove package needs update, following IceCat 68.9.0 update.

2020-06-02 Thread Mark H Weaver
Earlier, I wrote: > I just pushed the IceCat-68.9.0 security update to the master branch of > Guix, along with a graft for NSS. > > However, I just noticed that we now have Icedove in Guix, and that it's > based on 'icecat-source'. This is all good and proper (kudos to all who > worked on it!),

Re: Request to verify powerpc64-linux bootstrap binaries

2020-06-02 Thread Jack Hill
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020, Chris Marusich wrote: I have opened up a bug report for this issue, so we can continue the discussion there: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=41669 I will try on my end to obtain a differing gcc to see if I can analyze the difference. In the meantime, could