Dear Danny,
thanks! That lead me on the right track. In fact it's just
> sudo -E guix ...
without the Varibale name. "-E" passes the whole environment to
sudo. Now the package works (at least on my system) and the Logitech
presenter can be used under EXWM+xcompmgr under guix-system - Great! I
Hi Julien,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 02:37, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> I think it's time to start organising the Guix Days, traditionally held
> around Fosdem.
Nice initiative! Count on me for helping. :-)
> As for how it'll be organised. I propose to do something similar to
> what we need in
Hi,
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 05:40, Blake Shaw wrote:
> --
> tldr: is there also room to discuss contributing -- and possibly doing a
> sizeable makeover to -- the *Guile* documentation? If so, I could give a
> short 5 - 10 minutes presentation of what I think should be done (and
> would
Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
Katherine this is great material to chew on, much of which I can relate
to!
--
“In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni”
zimoun writes:
Hi Simon, thanks for the input,
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 05:40, Blake Shaw
> wrote:
>
>> --
>> tldr: is there also room to discuss contributing -- and possibly
>> doing a
>> sizeable makeover to -- the *Guile* documentation? If so, I could
>> give a
>> short 5 - 10
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> My current package definition is attached.
Well, now it is:
(define-public go-ipfs
(package
(name "go-ipfs")
(version "0.11.0")
(source
(origin
(method url-fetch/tarbomb)
(uri (string-append
"https://dist.ipfs.io/go-ipfs/v;
"Leo Famulari" writes:
> It's likely that you need to use a newer version of Go.
Thanks, that did it! With go-1.17 it compiles fine.
Cheers,
Konrad
Blake Shaw writes:
> Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
>
> Katherine, reading a big deeper into your user experience report, its really
> so so helpful to have this concrete sort of step-by-step user experience
> report.
Definitely! The first step to resolution is a common understanding.
> Would
Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
Katherine, reading a big deeper into your user experience report,
its really so so helpful to have this concrete sort of step-by-step
user experience report. Would you mind if I solicit the list
for more reports like this for anyone who might feel like offering them?
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Jelle Licht skribis:
>
>> I will work on that. Do we already have a suitable 'bulk change' in the
>> repo? Or should we first run `guix style', and subsequently use that
>> commit as the first entry in the .git-blame-ignore-revs file?
>
> The latter I
It's likely that you need to use a newer version of Go.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021, at 02:51, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> the version of IPFS in Guix is 0.8, and in view of the important changes
> introduced in 0.10, that's obsolete by now. Which is why I am trying to
> update to 0.11.
>
> My
On 2021-12-11 14:57, Josselin Poiret wrote:
Hello,
I submitted a patch. ID: 52470.
Unfortunately I can't find it here for some reason:
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52470
--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Demis Balbach
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello Guix!
In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
uploading any further work there :-).
A tentative release preparation branch 'version-1.4.0' was then created
from master, where
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
> finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
> uploading any further work there :-).
>
> [...]
>
> That's it! Enjoy the latest additions and improvements, and
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 20:34, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> In case you hadn't taken notice, the core-update-frozen branch was
> finally merged into master. So please reconfigure your remotes to avoid
> uploading any further work there :-).
>
> A tentative release preparation branch
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> zimoun skribis:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 13:10, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>
>>> The build phases that patch out these features would have to check
>>> for that build system option, much like they check the TESTS?
>>> option before attempting to
Hi Maxim,
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 at 22:20, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It'll have to be resolved on core-updates :-).
Well, Julia update can happen in master, IMHO. Even, depending on the
release date, it appears to me doable for the next release. ;-)
Cheers,
simon
Hi Simon,
zimoun writes:
> Hi,
>
> First, I am not convinced that upgrade Julia from 1.6.3 to 1.6.4 is
> something to do now; especially when the branch is “frozen”. Using
> patches #52117 [1], all failures are fixed for 1.6.3.
>
> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52117
>
>
> Here a rough
Hey,
> That's it! Enjoy the latest additions and improvements, and report any
> issues you encounter!
That's great news! Thanks to all the people that have been involved and
special thanks to you Maxim for your commitment.
Mathieu
19 matches
Mail list logo
