Re: On raw strings in commit field

Hi Liliana, Earlier, I wrote: > Sorry, but this is not even close to a valid argument that the set of > possible push actions to a Git repo is uncountable. In fact, it's quite > easy to prove that the set is countable. Any mathematician will know this. I suppose I should give a proof. I'll

Re: RFC: new syntax for inline patches

i may be lacking the necessary bird's eye view here... but why not just use good old copy-pasted diff for this? introducing extra complexity in the form of a new DSL has all kinds of costs that people usually ignore (*), and it's not clear to me how those costs would pay off compared to just

Re: Guix Package Search API Server

On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 08:38 +0100, Tissevert wrote: > Hi, > > This JSON file sounds nice and useful. By the way, it may only be a > transient error but the instance of hpcguix-web running at UMC Utrecht > mentioned in the github repos seems to be down > (https://hpcguix.op.umcutrecht.nl/). Is it

Re: Convention for new “guix style“?

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 09:05:00PM +0100, zimoun wrote: > BTW, I hope you will be able to schedule some time to watch this video. > It provides some points that appears to me being really worth to > consider when we speak about «Grow a Community». Rust is not a model > to bootstrap a compiler but

Re: How to handle package udev rules?

On 12/13/21 04:48, Γυψ wrote: Dear Danny, thanks! That lead me on the right track. In fact it's just sudo -E guix ... Hi! I recommend avoiding the use of sudo -E, as it will make guix system use your non-root user's $HOME/.cache to write its compiled files, which might become a problem in

Re: LuaJIT ffi issue with dynamic libraries

Hi, I'm pushing this again just in case anyone has an answer. Thanks! ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, November 25th, 2021 at 5:46 PM, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been having some issues with LuaJIT's FFI. More specifically with the > `load` function, that loads a

Replace current guix website package interface with hpcguix-web?

Dear Guixers, The hpcguix-web package interface (https://hpc.guix.info/browse) supports package search, unlike the current one at https://guix.gnu.org/en/packages/. Plus imo hpcguix-web looks nicer. It would be a great UI/UX improvement if the current search was replaced with hpcguix-web.

Re: LuaJIT ffi issue with dynamic libraries

Hi, On Wed, 05 Jan 2022 at 22:32, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > I'm pushing this again just in case anyone has an answer. Well, I do not have the answer and do not know either if it related but there is this really old bug: Cheers, simon

Re: RFC: new syntax for inline patches

Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Hi Ricardo, > > Am Dienstag, dem 04.01.2022 um 17:50 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> Hi Guix, >> >> does this pattern look familiar to you? >> >>   (arguments >>     (list >>     #:phases >>     '(modify-phases %standard-phases >>   (add-after 'unpack

Re: On raw strings in commit field

Am Mittwoch, dem 05.01.2022 um 04:28 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver: > Hi Liliana, > > Earlier, I wrote: > > Sorry, but this is not even close to a valid argument that the set > > of possible push actions to a Git repo is uncountable.  In fact, > > it's quite easy to prove that the set is countable. 

python-sqlalchemy-utils sanity-check phase broken

Hi Guixers, I just wanted to mention that python-sqlalchemy-utils sanity-check phase is broken. If anyone knows a fix feel free to chime in or send a patch, otherwise I'll start looking into it. ``` phase `install' succeeded after 0.6 seconds starting phase `add-install-to-pythonpath' phase

Re: RFC: new syntax for inline patches

Hi Ricardo, Am Dienstag, dem 04.01.2022 um 17:50 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > Hi Guix, > > does this pattern look familiar to you? > >   (arguments >     (list >     #:phases >     '(modify-phases %standard-phases >   (add-after 'unpack 'i-dont-care >     (lambda _ >  

Re: RFC: new syntax for inline patches

Hi, Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 02:20 +0100 schrieb Jelle Licht: > > > > > > > Here’s a colour sample for the new bikeshed: > > > > > >   (arguments > > >     (list > > >   #:patches > > >   #~(patch "the-file" > > > ((line 10) > > >   (+ "I ONLY WANTED TO ADD

Re: RFC: new syntax for inline patches

Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Donnerstag, dem 06.01.2022 um 02:20 +0100 schrieb Jelle Licht: >> > >> > >> > > Here’s a colour sample for the new bikeshed: >> > > >> > >   (arguments >> > >     (list >> > >   #:patches >> > >   #~(patch "the-file" >> > > ((line 10) >> >

Re: python-sqlalchemy-utils sanity-check phase broken

Hi, > I just wanted to mention that python-sqlalchemy-utils sanity-check phase > is broken. > […] > ImportError: cannot import name '_literal_as_text' from > 'sqlalchemy.sql.expression' >