Hi zimoun,
> In the light of «‘staging’ branch is open!» [1], it could be nice! :-)
there’s no way we’ll get this done by your proposed date May 8th. Last
time it took me two weeks full time to update everything. I don’t want
to delay the merge of staging for this.
> About the importer, I do not
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 10:50, Brendan Tildesley wrote:
> Therefore I'm working on making use of
> https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index to fully import base definitions
> all required crates rather than pulling metadata from the internet with each
> refresh.
>From my point of
Am 01.05.22 um 23:13 schrieb Anthony Wang:
I also found the wip-kde-plasma branch in the Guix Git repository has some made
some progress too. However, this branch has not been committed to in more than
a year and only supports KDE 5.19.
This branch intentionally is on 5.19, as the Readme
Am 02.05.22 um 11:14 schrieb Hartmut Goebel:
Basically there are package definitions for most of the Plasma
packages (as of 5.19), kwin, etc. One of the files has a list of state
per package. Anyhow I failed to make Plasma start the actual desktop.
To emphasize this: Packaging the Plasma
Hello,
there is also this line:
Am Mon, May 02, 2022 at 02:03:45AM +0800 schrieb Zhu Zihao:
> Could not set up the appstream test. appstreamcli is missing.
Maybe this is the real error, and a dependency is missing? We do have a
package called appstream in Guix, and it contains the binary
Hum, I guess, I have screwed up the reply’s header… Anyway!
Start of forwarded message
From: zimoun
To: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: Viewing derivation output in the store
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:41:17 +0200
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 at 09:30, Ludovic
Hi,
glad to see someone to pick up this task.
Am 01.05.22 um 05:06 schrieb Anthony Wang:
I have a few questions: What is the current status of KDE Plasma on Guix? And
also, how can I help or contribute?
You can find the current state of Plasma in the „wip-kde-plasma” branch
Hi Arun,
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 16:44, Arun Isaac wrote:
> Yes, with the update, Mumi will have a GraphQL API. GraphQL APIs are
> more flexible than traditional REST APIs. See https://graphql.org/ for
> more.
Is the update of Mumi done?
Well, this GraphQL API could ease the current workflow,
Joshua Branson schreef op vr 15-04-2022 om 09:56 [-0400]:
> +* Features scheduled for 2.0
> +- technical Guix System users can for GNU/Hurd Guix System on real hardware.
> +- Guix System installer supports guix home
> +- graphical (possibly gtk-based) front-end to guix cli
> +
Can we move over
Hi Vagrant,
Cool to see these reports.
On Mon, 02 May 2022 at 06:11, Vagrant Cascadian
wrote:
> $ guix challenge --diff=none $(cat guix-base-set)
>
> /gnu/store/8gmqvwf0ccqfyimficcnhxvrykwx6y8g-linux-libre-5.17.5 contents
> differ:
> no local build for
>
On 2022-05-02, zimoun wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2022 at 06:11, Vagrant Cascadian
> wrote:
>> $ guix challenge --diff=none $(cat guix-base-set)
...
>> The fact that the guix and guile packages do not build reproducibly is a
>> little disappointing as they're both so central to guix itself; I
>>
Hi Guix!
Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2022-04-14 16:08:46)
> This year is Guix’s ten year anniversary and also a time when in-person
> meetings are again possible in some regions of the world, so… Simon and
> myself have tentatively scheduled an in-person meeting in Paris, France,
> from September
Hi Philip,
Quoting Philip McGrath (2022-04-29 21:11:41)
> On 4/18/22 16:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Tanguy LE CARROUR skribis:
> >
> >> gpgv: Signature made Wed 16 Sep 2020 22:30:16 CEST
> >> gpgv:using RSA key 6115012DEA3026F62A98A556D6B570842F7E7F8D
> >> gpgv:
zimoun schreef op vr 29-04-2022 om 12:31 [+0200]:
> > Stack smashing protection (SSP) may incur measurable run-time
> > overhead
> > though so enabling that one by default may be less consensual.
>
> That’s true and it could be an issue for HPC practitioners. [...]
I'm not sure if this wasn't
zimoun writes:
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 12:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Stack smashing protection (SSP) may incur measurable run-time
>> overhead though so enabling that one by default may be less
>> consensual.
>
> That’s true and it could be an issue for HPC practitioners. However,
>
Hi,
I'll send my updated patches on Friday. Those are rebased on Brendan's updates.
Petr
Original Message
On May 1, 2022, 9:32 PM, kiasoc5 wrote:
> Brendan Tildesley and Petr Hodina (ccd) have made great progress so far:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50862
>
> Brendan's
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 at 14:06, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Changing all pre-existing packages, maybe. But doing this for new
>> packages (reducing review effort) and perhaps when a package is updated
>> (for purity) should be feasible I think? Then gradually things would
>> improve and
On 2022-04-27, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Lately, I've been trying to get a handle on the status of the really
> core packages in Debian
...
> I'd also be really curious to hear about the status of similar package
> sets in other distros!
With my metaphorical guix hoodie[1] on...
$ guix describe
zimoun schreef op ma 02-05-2022 om 19:41 [+0200]:
> > (*) In my case, this is not about supercomputers or computer
> > clusters, but about having software run fast enough on the hardware
> > that is available. In some situations, that's a fancy
> > supercomputer, but often a simple laptop can do
I'm not sure, but most likely I want to participiate in this
conference. Then I will present the Guix Gaming Service,
on which I am currently working and the proposed Guix Deck hardware.
Tobias (alyx)
Hi Maxime,
On Mon, 02 May 2022 at 18:25, Maxime Devos wrote:
> zimoun schreef op vr 29-04-2022 om 12:31 [+0200]:
>> > Stack smashing protection (SSP) may incur measurable run-time
>> > overhead
>> > though so enabling that one by default may be less consensual.
>>
>> That’s true and it could be
Hi,
Recently, we discussed [1] in «public-inbox/elfeed -> Maildir bridge
(was: Incentives for review)» some tips to ease the workflow dealing
with the various lists and their volume.
Kyle wrote some Emacs glue around public-inbox, named piem [2].
One cool feature exposed by Kyle in [1] is being
22 matches
Mail list logo
