Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 5:44 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> What do you think of prefixing every line with the name of the service
> that is responsible for it? This way we could probably also
> prettify/post-process the output somewhat.
I think that's a great idea!
- Dave
On 2022-12-11, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The second release candidate of the upcoming 1.4.0 release is now
> available for testing, fixing issues that were reported for rc1:
Also available in .deb format on your favorite Debian mirrors:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/guix
Currently only in
Hello,
Roman Scherer writes:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> I tested the foreign distro installation of
> guix-binary-1.4.0rc2.aarch64-linux.tar.xz
> on Asahi Linux. I went through the installation without any problems.
And I tested the installation of
'guix-binary-1.4.0rc2.armhf-linux.tar.xz' on top of a
> 2. Does hibernation work in case of a swap-file inside a
root-partition inside a luks-encrypted device?
Just posting to confirm that this does work (with BTRFS as well;
single drive only, not RAID).
You could try seeing what they're doing here to cross-build
https://github.com/flavioc/cross-hurd
It worked last time I ran it (which was admittedly a while ago)
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
[...]
> What do you think of prefixing every line with the name of the service
> that is responsible for it? This way we could probably also
> prettify/post-process the output somewhat.
I think that's a great idea; I'm not sure if you've noticed, but mcron
Hi Guix,
here is some output from “guix system reconfigure”:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
…
activating system...
The following derivation will be built:
/gnu/store/7361cd8aasxwwb93ygdfwjp3ghn06ahb-switch-to-system.scm.drv
building
Ivan Vilata i Balaguer (2022-12-12 21:11:53 +0100) wrote:
> Mekeor Melire (2022-12-10 01:00:24 +) wrote:
>
> > > What about the "filefrag" executable from the "e2fsprogs" package.
> > > According to this article, it can be used in place of the deprecated
> > > uswsusp suite:
> > >
> > >
