Hi,
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 21:14, Liliana Marie Prikler
> wrote:
>
>> I do wonder how the ChangeId would work in practice. Since it's not
>> really assigned by the committer, it would have to be generated "on the
>> fly" and attached to the mail in between,
Hi there,
you know the Shepherd: it is an elegant service manager looking after a
herd of daemons. Since it can be extended with Guile, I decided to do
just that to add an extra skill to the Shepherd, turning it into the
Swineherd.
The Swineherd is a manager of Guix System containers. It is
Hi Liliana and Maxim,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
[...]
> The thing is, we're discussing the same basic workflow
No, we are discussing two (complementary) workflows:
1. the one I suggested to add a "footer-metadata-field" named
Fix/Fixes/Close/Closes/whatever that will allow people pushing
Hi Katherine,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 at 10:05, Katherine Cox-Buday
wrote:
> And these are subjective statements, which are bad to rest decisions on.
> I have the opinion that this style of commit message is difficult and
> doesn't have a lot of value; others think it's easy and find a lot of
>
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> AFAIU mumi does not (still?) have ad authentication/authorization,
> right?
>
> If so how do you plan to deal with users posting SPAM or similar
> unappropriate content?
It only sends email on behalf of commenters, so we’re using the same
email mechanism to deal
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
>> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory,
>> > and
>> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
>> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the
>> > dev
>> > experience.
>>
>>
>>
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
>
>> AFAIU mumi does not (still?) have ad authentication/authorization,
>> right?
>>
>> If so how do you plan to deal with users posting SPAM or similar
>> unappropriate content?
>
> It only sends email on behalf of commenters, so
Re,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 09:57, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Somehow, the line is drawn using a two-axis plot of “easy vs boring”
> when instead we should draw a two-axis plot of “complexity vs capture
> the values”.
I meant, the thread is considering a one-axis plot using a subjective
parameter
Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
>> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory,
>> > and
>> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
>> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the
>> > dev
>> > experience.
>>
>>
>>
De Olivier Dion le 12/09/2023 à 19:11:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023, Emmanuel Beffara wrote:
> > Hello Guix devel,
> >
> > I am facing a severe performance issue with TeX Live: compilation of any
> > document is an order of magnitude slower with a Guix installed system as
> > compared to a manual
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 12:53, MSavoritias wrote:
>
>> Do you know if there are any plans to write a scheme bug/patching
>> system? Because looking a bit into it, it doesn't seem like its that
>> actively developed so maybe we would be better served by one in
Hello,
Emmanuel Beffara writes:
> I am facing a severe performance issue with TeX Live: compilation of any
> document is an order of magnitude slower with a Guix installed system as
> compared to a manual installation. Is anyone confronted to this phenomenon, or
> is there a way to fix this ?
Hi Giovanni,
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
[...]
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>
> WDYT about the following
> Applies: [patch]
> Closes: [patch]
> Resolves: [patch]
> Done: [patch]
[...]
> Anyway, I agree with Liliana that having more keyworks will help
I dont think we need to compare things here. Of course we should be able
to make lives easier for reviewers and contributors. There is no need
here to compare them. Remember that making lives easier for contributors
will make lives easier for reviewers too after all :) Because more
correct
Simon Tournier writes:
> Hi Katherine,
>
> Thank you for your extensive analysis. I concur.
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 10:11, Katherine Cox-Buday
> wrote:
>
>> 3. We should reify a way for Guix, the project, to measure, and track
>> progress,
>> against long-term goals. Particularly
Hi Fannys,
Fannys writes:
> Ekaitz Zarraga writes:
>
>>> > This is what I mean when I say many times emacs is kind of mandatory,
>>> > and
>>> > this thread is kind of a demonstration of what I meant because the main
>>> > discussion evolved to: you can use this or that in emacs to ease the
On 9/13/23 3:06 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Hi there,
you know the Shepherd: it is an elegant service manager looking after a
herd of daemons. Since it can be extended with Guile, I decided to do
just that to add an extra skill to the Shepherd, turning it into the
Swineherd.
The Swineherd is a
Hey, nice job Ricardo! This looks awesome!
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:29 AM Katherine Cox-Buday
wrote:
>
> On 9/13/23 3:06 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > you know the Shepherd: it is an elegant service manager looking after a
> > herd of daemons. Since it can be extended with
Hey!
I think this has been talked about for a while [1], but I want to make it
happen. Currently the guix-daemon is still similar to the nix-daemon
that it was forked from, and is implemented in C++. I think that a Guile
implementation of the guix-daemon will simplify Guix and better support
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:29 AM Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> Rewrites are risky because you only get the value right at the end,
> therefore the priority is to get a minimal but viable implementation in
> Guile that can be switched to
Sounds exciting! I would like to help with
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Am Montag, dem 11.09.2023 um 16:41 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
>> [...]
>> Perhaps both approach[es] could be combined. I still see value in a
>> general scheme to automate closing applied series that linger on in
>> Debbugs.
>>
>>
Hi Simon,
please forgive me if I continue drifting in this beautiful sea...
This message is /very/ long but it's just because I'm trying to do my
best to provide a deep analisys of the **big** problems with eventually
adopting a «web based PR model» (please see below for a definition) for
Hi,
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> On 2023-09-09, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Vagrant Cascadian writes:
Did you see my message about integrating a commit-hook similar to what
Gerrit uses? It produces unique ID such as:
--8<---cut
Hi!
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 9:29 AM Christopher Baines wrote:
>>
>> Rewrites are risky because you only get the value right at the end,
>> therefore the priority is to get a minimal but viable
> Can you share any ways you're currently using this?
We had been using this at work as part of a much bigger training
platform to launch customizable (but still reproducible) interactive
environments for workshops and courses.
An example is pre-configured RStudio installations with shared
Am Mittwoch, dem 13.09.2023 um 11:27 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
> For just closing cross-referenced bugs, I agree. For closing
> forgotten, already merged issues on guix-patches we'd need the
> Change-Id and a tool able to map Change-Ids -> issue number (mumi is
> in the best place to do so).
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 11:06, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
[...]
>
> The Swineherd was designed to be used with Shepherd on foreign distros,
> so it does not assume to be running on top of Guix System (for better or
> worse).
Oh! It is very promising. Really cool!
> Of course the
On 2023-09-13, Christopher Baines wrote:
> I think this has been talked about for a while [1], but I want to make it
> happen. Currently the guix-daemon is still similar to the nix-daemon
> that it was forked from, and is implemented in C++. I think that a Guile
> implementation of the guix-daemon
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 at 21:14, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> I do wonder how the ChangeId would work in practice. Since it's not
> really assigned by the committer, it would have to be generated "on the
> fly" and attached to the mail in between, which could result in all
> kinds of nasty
Hi Giovanni,
Thank you for your detailed message. Sorry, I have not read all the
details because I have been lost. What do you want to explain?
Well, let me explain my understanding using my own words. :-)
When one reduces to the core of the workflows, the main difference
between “email
Hi,
On Wednesday, September 13th, 2023 at 3:42 PM, Maxim Cournoyer
wrote:
>
> There's no lock-in. You can use any tool you want. Most people hacking
> on Guix do so with Emacs and Geiser because these are currently the best
> tools (that I know of) to do the job; these are the tools many of
Hello Guix!
My (useful? misguided? questionable?) quest around Cuirass has led me
closer to some of the goals mentioned in my previous message¹ and in the
‘TODO’ file².
The ‘wip-actors’ branch³, which I plan to merge soon, splits activities
of the ‘cuirass register’ process among several actors.
32 matches
Mail list logo
