On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 11:34:13AM +0100, Simon Tournier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I hope that the discussion we had yesterday (Friday 2nd) in Guix Days
> has clarified the idea behind this proposal.
>
> I am waiting Ludo’s notes in order to refine this proposal, integrate
> many comments and/or
Hi Sunhail,
> Josselin Poiret writes:
>
>> One thing I would like to get rid of though is debbugs. It causes a
>> lot of pain for everyone, eg. when sending patchsets, it completely
>> breaks modern email because it insists on rewriting DMARC-protected
>> headers, thus needing to also rewrite
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 07 2024, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> With a properly configured b4, one
> could simply run `b4 shazam some-msg-id` and it would automatically
> apply the corresponding patchset.
Note that you can do the same with one Emacs command while browsing Gnus
mailing lists:
Steve George writes:
> Hi,
>
> Did anyone take a photo of the discussion whiteboard?
>
> And/or anyone get a photo of the room generally that could be used in
> the blog post? Be nice to have a visual ...
I took a picture of the infrastructure discussion whiteboard:
Hi,
Did anyone take a photo of the discussion whiteboard?
And/or anyone get a photo of the room generally that could be used in
the blog post? Be nice to have a visual ...
Steve
ps I will check with each person in any photo that they don't object to
it being posted
On 06/02/2024 07:39,
Hi again Sunhail,
Josselin Poiret writes:
> Hi Sunhail,
>
>> Josselin Poiret writes:
>>
>>> One thing I would like to get rid of though is debbugs. It causes a
>>> lot of pain for everyone, eg. when sending patchsets, it completely
>>> breaks modern email because it insists on rewriting
Heyo,
Nicolas Graves writes:
> Did someone made some progress on the build-system since that to allow
> for this to be taken into account? If you still have it, could you share
> your "fiio" packages once again? The paste link is expired. Thanks!
To my knowledge (it’s two years old now, so
Hi Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Hi Josselin,
>> They both can co-exist with debbugs, and for now the patchwork instance
>> of QA is not usable for status tracking (because it is not meant to be
>> used as such for now). One can already use both of them, but using both
>> supercedes
Hi Josselin,
>>> b4/lei is a nice example (we already have yhetil.org as a back-end,
>>> but maybe a more blessed one would be better) of a tool that lets you
>>> completely automate applying a patchset to a branch.
>>>
>>> patchwork is a nice tool to gather up and track patchsets, with status
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 5:46 PM Juliana Sims wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Coming off the wonderful experience of meeting up with a bunch of
> fellow Guixers (Guixs? Guix? what is our demonym?) in person for the
> first time at Guix Days, I would very much like to have similar
> experiences more
Hi Juliana,
El 6/02/24 a las 15:53, Juliana Sims escribió:
Coming off the wonderful experience of meeting up with a bunch of
fellow Guixers (Guixs? Guix? what is our demonym?) [...]
I support the use of «guix» as the plural (geeks) and «guik» as the
singular (geek)
Hello everyone,
Coming off the wonderful experience of meeting up with a bunch of
fellow Guixers (Guixs? Guix? what is our demonym?) in person for the
first time at Guix Days, I would very much like to have similar
experiences more often. I know there are Paris and London meetups;
would
On 2019-07-24 15:41, Jelle Licht wrote:
> Timothy Sample writes:
>
> [snip]
>
>> I’ve come to think that bootstrapping JavaScript might be easier than it
>> looks. As time goes on, Node gets better at the newer JavaScript
>> features. This removes the need for things like Babel or Rollup,
13 matches
Mail list logo
