Am Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:08:45PM +0100 schrieb Tanguy LE CARROUR:
> I’m "reviewing" `[bug#68997] gnu: lightning: Update to 2.2.3`… please
> find another one!
Now that you jump to complicated and not even yet built by QA packages,
you are safe from my competition :)
Andreas
I am a libre game developer and I plan to package my game that I am
currently working on for Guix. On the long term I also want to make a
scalable distribution service that one can self host and which allows
paying for games using GNU Taler. Once the user has payed they can get
substitutes, if
On 9 Feb, Edouard Klein wrote:
>
> Skyler Ferris writes:
>
> > On 2/6/24 05:39, Steve George wrote:
> >> I agreed to organise some 'patch review' online sessions in the next
> >> couple of
> >> weeks.
> >>
> >> Organising a basic process is a good topic for that online session. For
> >>
Hi Clément,
On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Clément Lassieur wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
> System distribution." wrote:
>
> Each email has its own message id, so how would you group them?
As author, I'll respond. I was thinking of the In-Reply-To:
Hi,
On mer., 07 févr. 2024 at 10:41, Carlo Zancanaro wrote:
>> Why not? Do I miss something in the implementation of ’match’?
>
> The only reason I can think of would be if these matches are sometimes
> provided improper lists, which need to fail these match conditions. That
> seems unlikely
On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution." wrote:
> Hi Clément,
>
> On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Clément Lassieur wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
>> System distribution." wrote:
>>
>> Each
Hi Josselin,
On Wed, Feb 07 2024, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> The fact that you have to wait for Debbugs's response after the first
> mail to get the proper mail to reply to means that we can't automate
> sending whole patchsets
Could a modified version of Debbugs group submissions by Message-IDs
On Sun, Feb 11 2024, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU
System distribution." wrote:
> Hi Josselin,
>
> On Wed, Feb 07 2024, Josselin Poiret wrote:
>
>> The fact that you have to wait for Debbugs's response after the first
>> mail to get the proper mail to reply to means that
[unable to locate Romain's original message]
Hi Josselin,
On Sat, Feb 10 2024, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> The idea would be to ... make sure that keyboard-layout-config appears
> first in the generated config.
I do not suffer from the issue described here but rewrote the bootloader
code locally
Hi,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Hi Josselin,
>
>>> They both can co-exist with debbugs, and for now the patchwork instance
>>> of QA is not usable for status tracking (because it is not meant to be
>>> used as such for now). One can already use both of
On 2024-02-07, Josselin Poiret wrote:
> The fact that you have to wait for Debbugs's response after the first
> mail to get the proper mail to reply to means that we can't automate
> sending whole patchsets, and have to resort to hacks like the CLI `mumi`
> tool uses. I can't just send a patchset
Christopher Baines writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
Hey!
After substitute availability taking a bit of a dive recently,
the
bordeaux build farm has finally caught back up and QA is back
submitting
builds for packages changed by patches.
QA also has a feature to allow easily tagging
12 matches
Mail list logo
