Re: Committers available for Patch hacking/review meet-up?

Hi, On mar., 13 févr. 2024 at 14:48, Steve George wrote: > At Guix Days we said we'd organise some patch review sessions. Cool! > Anyone available? If you are and can put your name down for a particular > date that would be brilliant! I will do. Thanks for the initiative! > Q2: Does

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi, Late to the party. :-) Processing my backlog… On jeu., 18 janv. 2024 at 10:25, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > I'm currently in review and split some packages from (gnu packages golang) > into > (gnu packages golang-crypto) to simplify the maintenance. I try to play with > that option and

Re: Debugging missing architecture support

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > You can try this in guix repl: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > (import (srfi srfi-1) > (guix packages) > (gnu packages)) > > (define p (specification->package "git-annex")) > (define deps (package-development-inputs

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

On Thu, Feb 15 2024, Clément Lassieur wrote: > Hey Simon! > > On Wed, Feb 14 2024, Simon Tournier wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On dim., 11 févr. 2024 at 11:38, Maxim Cournoyer >> wrote: >> >>> 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; >> >> I agree*! > > I don't agree (both

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Steve, ( On a side note, the triage of old bugs is a similar problem. They are easy to find [2], read, check and send an email to 12...@debbugs.gnu.org does not appear to me an issue with any tool. For what it is worth and without any willing of being harsh, I am able

Re: Git-LFS or Git Annex?

Hi Timothy, On sam., 27 janv. 2024 at 10:59, Timothy Sample wrote: > https://git.ngyro.com/git-annex-remote-clouda/tree/git-annex-remote-clouda/remote.scm Oh cool, thanks. Bookmarked. Cheers, simon

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi, On dim., 11 févr. 2024 at 11:38, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; I agree*! > it > even selects the latest revision it finds in the issue thread. To make >

Re: Committers available for Patch hacking/review meet-up?

Hi Andreas, On 14/02/2024 14:04, Andreas Enge wrote: Hello, thanks, Steve, for getting things going! Am Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:48:08PM + schrieb Steve George: We said they'd be every 13 days, for 3 months to see if it has interest. Proposed calendar: 7th March (Thursday) I will be

Re: Debugging missing architecture support

Hi Saku, > Maybe someone else can give more general or Guix specific advice on > finding out the cause of such problems, but I believe that in this case > the fix would just be packaging GHC for aarch64-linux. It should[1] be > possible but it will require some work. > > [1]:

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > PS: *agree on B4 although there is tricky bugs as reported here: > . I think b4's ML is more active than the GitHub issues, I have already sent some bug reports and patches there that were picked up quite fast. Best, --

Re: Committers available for Patch hacking/review meet-up?

On 15/02/2024 00:53, jgart wrote: 7th March (Thursday) 20th March (Wednesday) 2nd April (Tuesday) 15th April (Monday) 3rd May (Friday) 16th May (Thursday) 29th May (Wednesday) Each one held at 19:00 CET / 18:00 BST / 13:00 EST [0] for 1.5 hours. Hi, Thanks for putting this together. Lately

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi Simon! > What is the status of this? Is all fine? There are new modules available which I use for moving packages from golang.scm and other places e.g. syncthing.scm. - golang-build.scm - golang-check.scm - golang-compression.scm - golang-crypto.scm - golang-web.scm - golang-xyz.scm I

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hey Simon! On Wed, Feb 14 2024, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > On dim., 11 févr. 2024 at 11:38, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >> 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; > > I agree*! I don't agree (both Gwene + Gnus or Emacs Debbugs work perfectly too and allow to

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Simon, On Thu, Feb 15 2024, Clément Lassieur wrote: > May I add too, that you can add "Message-ID" in gnus-visible-headers. The author of Debbugs.el, Michael Albinus, said this was likely the best solution. To request a feature in Debbugs.el, please file a bug against the "debbugs.gnu.org"

Re: Mechanism for helping in multi-channels configuration

Hi Attila, On mar., 06 févr. 2024 at 17:16, Attila Lendvai wrote: >> The wishlist is: provide a machine-readable description on guix-science >> channel side in order to help in finding the good overlap between >> commits of different channels. > > i wrote about a missing abstraction here: > >

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Clément, If read correctly, you answered about Gnus (debbugs.el): >>> --8<---cut here---start->8--- >>> (with-current-buffer gnus-original-article-buffer >>> (message-fetch-field "Message-ID")) >>> --8<---cut

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Josselin, On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 12:07, Josselin Poiret wrote: > I think b4's ML is more active than the GitHub issues, I have already > sent some bug reports and patches there that were picked up quite fast. Yeah, Kyle pointed me that out months ago. Then I have never taken the time to

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Clément, On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 12:45, Clément Lassieur wrote: >>> 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; >> >> I agree*! > > I don't agree (both Gwene + Gnus or Emacs Debbugs work perfectly too and > allow to apply a range of n patches at once) but I don't

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

On Thu, Feb 15 2024, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi Clément, > > On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 12:45, Clément Lassieur > wrote: > 'b4 shazam' is probably the most trouble-free way to apply patches; >>> >>> I agree*! >> >> I don't agree (both Gwene + Gnus or Emacs Debbugs work perfectly too and >>

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

Hi Felix, On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 07:32, Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." wrote: > To request a feature in Debbugs.el, please file a bug against the > "debbugs.gnu.org" package on debbugs.gnu.org. To be clear, my message [1] was not to report a

Re: Golang check phase skipping some tests?

Hi, On jeu., 15 févr. 2024 at 10:10, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > I would push go-team branch to check some lower level modifications to > go-build-system which are queued right now. I need someone with admin access > to > set the branch on CI as well ;-) Cool! Thank you. Cheers, simon

Re: Mechanism for helping in multi-channels configuration

Hi Christina, On sam., 03 févr. 2024 at 15:27, Christina O'Donnell wrote: >  1. Have a script that scrapes all the define-public symbols in every > file in >     every package. I think you mean ’fold-packages’. >  2. Have a script that determines the symbols needed by each file. (Macros >

Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion

On Thu, Feb 15 2024, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi Clément, > > If read correctly, you answered about Gnus (debbugs.el): > --8<---cut here---start->8--- (with-current-buffer gnus-original-article-buffer (message-fetch-field "Message-ID"))