On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Ok. Andraes' and Ludo's explanations convince me. However I'm
skeptical that
the Octave devs would be quite so convinced. And removing the
propagates-inputs
will mean patching to the Octave source and I don't
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): New variable. Thanks to Zerwas for the
initial recipe.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 64 +++
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
index 52a434a..e0ddc30
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:11:14AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Ok. Andraes' and Ludo's explanations convince me. However I'm
skeptical that
the Octave devs would be quite so convinced. And removing the
Sree Harsha Totakura sreehar...@totakura.in skribis:
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnurl): New variable. Thanks to Zerwas for the
initial recipe.
Thanks, applied, with this phase:
+ (lambda* (#:rest args)
+ (begin (chdir tests)
+(let* ((path