On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Excellent! Would be nice to check Evince and EOG, which were known to
have this kind of problem.
I've checked Evince and it works fine. I couldn't find EOG. What's the
name of the package?
Great. The strategy looks good to
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org wrote:
Attached an updated patch. If it is fine, I will update the
documentation in a separate patch to follow.
I forgot to mention that I'm not sure how to update gnu-system.am. I
looked for cmake-build-system as an example, but it
Eric Bavier ericbav...@gmail.com skribis:
From 16e2259eb3860686a30d40e94c4c5bd39d60dfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier bav...@member.fsf.org
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 17:33:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: conkeror: install conkeror-spawn-helper.
* gnu/packages/conkeror.scm
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org skribis:
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org wrote:
Attached an updated patch. If it is fine, I will update the
documentation in a separate patch to follow.
I forgot to mention that I'm not sure how to update gnu-system.am. I
looked
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org skribis:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Excellent! Would be nice to check Evince and EOG, which were known to
have this kind of problem.
I've checked Evince and it works fine.
Great.
I couldn't find EOG. What's the name
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Federico Beffa be...@ieee.org skribis:
I've checked Evince and it works fine.
By the way, note that when started, it complains about missing
libcanberra as does emacs.
The problem is solved by adding libcanberra as an input
Hello, I tried to move (and rename for consistency with other ‘show-…’
procedures) ‘manifest-show-transaction’ from (guix profiles) to (guix
ui) as we were discussing on #guix today, but I found that tests began
to fail. And I can't figure it out. The first failed test is
builders.scm. Its log
Sorry, I've found that the patch I sent is not cleanly applied to the
latest master checkout. The modified patch is attached.
It seems the fail happens only if there is
#:use-module (guix profiles)
in (guix ui). If (guix profiles) is not used, there are no problems.
I'm stuck.
From
I've added documentation for the glib-or-gtk-build-system.
Regards,
Fede
From 27748f063513260cf4dac7d56e5148fbc154b4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Federico Beffa be...@fbengineering.ch
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:04:25 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] glib-or-gtk-build-system: added documentation
*
Eric Bavier ericbav...@gmail.com skribis:
Sending this patch to the list, as it would likely cause a lot of
rebuilds.
From c824d34faecc173bafc513d0b2052597a46dddfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Bavier bav...@member.fsf.org
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:55:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu:
Alex Kost alez...@gmail.com skribis:
?: 16 [primitive-load-path guix/profiles ...]
In guix/profiles.scm:
21: 15 [#procedure 9776070 ()]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2951: 14 [define-module* (guix profiles) #:filename ...]
2926: 13 [resolve-imports (((guix utils)) ((guix records)) ((guix
I took the freedom to slightly amend the text (see diff below), tweaked
the commit log, and pushed it.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 36337f1..ed2b81b 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -1644,27 +1644,27 @@ debugging information''), which roughly
Hello Guix hackers,
Below is a preliminary version of a new guix command called
'environment'. For those familiar with Nix, it works a lot like
nix-shell.
The purpose of 'guix environment' is to assist hackers in creating
reproducible development environments without polluting their package
Tidy is an application/library for fixing problems with HTML markup that
is depended on by a number of other projects. However, tidy hasn't been
updated since about 2009 and does not provide release tarballs. There's
only a CVS repo, and it seems impossible to download a tarball snapshot
of a
This is technically a pre-release, but given that our current Icecat has
at least one security hole (and probably others), and fails to build on
i686, I'm inclined to push it to master immediately.
I suppose I should also mention that I've only tested it on i686.
What do you think?
Mark
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org writes:
This is technically a pre-release, but given that our current Icecat has
at least one security hole (and probably others), and fails to build on
i686, I'm inclined to push it to master immediately.
After some more testing, I went ahead and pushed this.
16 matches
Mail list logo
