ng0 writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 06:44:11PM +, ng0 wrote:
>>> From: ng0
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/irc.scm (epic5): New variable.
>>
>> Thanks for the updated patch.
>>
>> Sorry I didn't notice
Andy Wingo skribis:
> * gnu/packages/cups.scm (cups-filters): Update to look for the test page
> template in the cups-filter output dir, as cups and cups-filter do not
> share an output dir.
I’ve applied this one on core-updates as
085cca5bc1d8ca6b3d7d01e4a5c4f0f3886e7fbc.
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> Hi Ludo,
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 14:39:00 +0200
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>> Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
>>
>> > so I've updated to 947a5d47a50252cb0b87b78a8f83f274dec593e2 git guix and
>> > now I
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Mon 10 Oct 2016 10:32, Clément Lassieur writes:
>
>>> +(define-record-type*
>>> + configuration-field make-configuration-field configuration-field?
>>> + (name configuration-field-name)
>>> + (type configuration-field-type)
Hello!
Leo Famulari skribis:
> There's a format string vulnerability (with unknown impact) in our dbus:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/85
>
> Please read that message and the linked bug report.
>
> My understanding of the upsream analysis of the format string
>
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (infamous-plugins): New variable.
LGTM!
Ludo’.
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 08:36:20PM -0700, Al McElrath wrote:
>> Attached is a patch to update sane-backends to 1.0.25. I checked and the
>> tests are still failing.
>>
>> From deaf7c884363361b043e5b1008e30bfc84f7216c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From:
Hi Theodoros,
> * gnu/packages/embedded.scm (gcc-arm-none-eabi-6): New variable.
> * gnu/packages/patches/gcc-arm-none-eabi-multilib.patch : New file.
> * gnu/packages/patches/gcc-6-cross-environment-variables.patch : New file.
[…]
> diff --git
John Darrington writes:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but when is a patch considered significant enough
> to be updated on core-updates instead of master? Put another way, what
> is the
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
Excuse my ignorance, but when is a patch considered significant enough
to be updated on core-updates instead of master? Put another way, what
is the purpose of core-updates?
Core updates is for those things near the
Theodoros Foradis writes:
> Hi,
>
> I see that the original patches were applied in master. Did you check if
> cross-binutils with 2.25.1 source works for your use case?
Yes, I’m using the regular cross-binutils. Thanks for the hint!
> Would you like me to reformat my
Hi,
I see that the original patches were applied in master. Did you check if
cross-binutils with 2.25.1 source works for your use case?
Would you like me to reformat my patches for gcc-6.2.0, so that they can
be applied on current master, or is there some other issue blocking that?
Regards,
--
Leo Famulari writes:
> There's a format string vulnerability (with unknown impact) in our dbus:
>
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/85
>
> Please read that message and the linked bug report.
>
> My understanding of the upsream analysis of the format string
> vulnerability
Hi.
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 21:28:46 +0800
iyzs...@member.fsf.org (宋文武) wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > I browsed the patch series quickly; the packages I did not comment
> > on LGTM, modulo the question of whether we should prefix them.
> >
>
> Thanks for the review! I
Amirouche Boubekki writes:
> Warning: scheme-bytestructures works on various implementation of Scheme but
> this patch adds
> it only for guile-2.0.
>
> This is a pure scheme package there is no autotools that's why I use the
> trivial-build-system.
>
> This
Hi.
On Sat, 08 Oct 2016 15:00:27 +0200
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
> I browsed the patch series quickly; the packages I did not comment on
> LGTM, modulo the question of whether we should prefix them.
Thanks. It looks like there are some suggestions there which weren't
covered by the
There's a format string vulnerability (with unknown impact) in our dbus:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2016/q4/85
Please read that message and the linked bug report.
My understanding of the upsream analysis of the format string
vulnerability is that only the bus owner can trigger it. So, if the
* gnu/packages/glib.scm (dbus): Update to 1.10.12.
---
gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
index 7e247d3..e7419fd 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm
@@ -64,7 +64,7
All the technical bits (linting, reproducibility, downloading, and
installation) check out for me.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
* doc/guix.texi (Python Modules): New sub-subsection "Specifying
Dependencies".
---
doc/guix.texi | 47 +++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 57821c5..6d74f4e 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++
Hello,
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Alex Vong writes:
>
>
>> * gnu/packages/video.scm (vlc)[inputs]: Add eudev, faad2, fluidsynth,
>> gnome-vfs, gst-plugins-base, gtk+-2, jack-2, libass, libavc1394,
>> libbluray, libcaca, libdca, libdvdnav,
* guix/build/python-build-system.scm (add-installed-pythonpath,
site-packages): New exported procedures.
---
guix/build/python-build-system.scm | 22 +-
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
Also refactor some common code into a new function.
Examples for these pacakges are python(2)-setuptools and python(2)-pip, which
are installed together with python itself.
* guix/scripts/lint.scm (warn-if-package-has-input): New procedure.
(check-inputs-should-be-native package): Use it;
This requires setuptools to be installed together with python, which is
the case for Python 3 anyway and which we do for our build of Python 2
(see last commit).
* guix/build/python-build-system.scm (install): Add
"--single-version-externally-managed" and "--root=/" to params to be
passed to
TODO: Documentation, test-case.
* guix/build-system/python.scm (python-build): New keyword argument
"#:use-setuptools?", defaulting to #t.
* guix/build/python-build-system.scm (call-setup-py): New positional
parameter "use-setuptools?". If false, do not use the shim-wrapper
for addin
From: Marius Bakke
This is needed for packages using "distutils" instead of "setuptools" since
the former does not understand the "--single-version-externally-managed"
flag. Also export __file__ since it will be unset when setup.py is called from
python "exec".
*
* guix/scripts/lint.scm (check-inputs-should-be-native package): Add python
packages which are typically used for testing or for building the
documentation.
---
guix/scripts/lint.scm | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/lint.scm
* guix/build/python-build-system.scm (check): Delete .egg-info dirs
which did not exist prior to calling setup.py but afterwards.
---
guix/build/python-build-system.scm | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
Hi,
this is the first set of patches for the changed python-build-system.
I ask you for review so we can progress in steps.
The whole patch set will be about 50 or 60 patches, where this first set are
the changes of the build system itsefl and the remaining sets will change the
packaging
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-2.7): Add "--with-ensurepip=install" to
configure-flags.
* doc/guix.texi (Python Modules): Document it.
---
doc/guix.texi | 3 +++
gnu/packages/python.scm | 1 +
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index
* gnu/packages/cups.scm (ghostscript/cups): New variable.
(cups-filters): Use ghostscript/cups. Capture path to "gs" at
compilation time.
---
gnu/packages/cups.scm | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/cups.scm b/gnu/packages/cups.scm
Thanks for the responses Ludo and Eric.
On 02/10/16 23:33, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Currently, we build a single set of x86_64 packages assuming SSE but
not SSE2 instructions, but sometimes it would be nice to use more
recent instructions like AVX.
Isn’t SSE2 part of the x86_64 base spec? I
Hi Leo,
> Let us know when the two of you think the code is ready to be tested on
> Hydra, and I will set it up.
I now have a patch-set ready for testing. The patches will still need
some clean-up, but the result should be okay so far.
Please set up a Hydra channel so we can test cross building.
Apologize for many questions.
git checkout master
git pull
git checkout your-branch-with-bluefish
git rebase master
I made:
$ git checkout master
M gnu/packages/gnome.scm
Already on 'master'
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'.
$ git pull
* gnu/services/cups.scm: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add gnu/services/cups.scm.
* doc/guix.texi (Printing Services): New section.
---
doc/guix.texi | 831 +++
gnu/local.mk |1 +
gnu/services/cups.scm | 1165
* gnu/packages/cups.scm (cups-filters): Update to look for the test page
template in the cups-filter output dir, as cups and cups-filter do not
share an output dir.
---
gnu/packages/cups.scm | 28 +---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python2-pytest-runner): Was defined twice, remove
duplicate definition.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index a9fd8eb..f1e9264 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++
* gnu/package/python.scm (python-zope-testing): Add snippet to strip
byte-code and garbage from source.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 345c6a7..a289093 100644
---
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pytest-xdist): Add source snippet.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 10 +-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index f1e9264..345c6a7 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-keyring, python-pylockfile): Update
home-page url. (python-pathlib): Update description.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index
Hartmut Goebel (5):
gnu: python2-pytest-runner: Remove duplicate definition.
gnu: python-pytest-xdist: Remove python byte-code files from source.
gnu: python-zope-testing: Strip byte-code and garbage from source.
gnu: python.scm: Update some home-page urls and descriptions.
guix:
---
guix/build/python-build-system.scm | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
b/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
index 9109fb4..e906e60 100644
--- a/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
+++ b/guix/build/python-build-system.scm
@@
* guix/build/cmake-build-system.scm (cmake-build-system): Set
environment variable CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE to an non-empty value.
---
guix/build/cmake-build-system.scm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/guix/build/cmake-build-system.scm
b/guix/build/cmake-build-system.scm
Andy Wingo skribis:
> * gnu/packages/cups.scm (ghostscript/cups): New variable.
> (cups-filters): Use ghostscript/cups. Capture path to "gs" at
> compilation time.
LGTM!
Because of the rebuild involved, I decided to go ahead and push it to
core-updates.
I haven’t looked
ng0 writes:
> * .mailmap: Update entries for ng0.
> ---
> .mailmap | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
> index 4f756ec..85f5021 100644
> --- a/.mailmap
> +++ b/.mailmap
> @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ Ludovic
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Roel Janssen writes:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> David Craven writes:
>>>
> What do you think? The alternative is to drop Texmaker and all the
> other packages that depend on Chromium as distributed by Qt.
Hello,
Thanks for the review. I check on hydra just now and indeed some inputs
does not build on all supported architectures, namely fluidsynth,
gst-plugins-base, libmpeg2 and samba. So I comment them out (in case
they are available in the future). Here is the new patch:
From
On Mon 10 Oct 2016 10:32, Clément Lassieur writes:
>> +(define-record-type*
>> + configuration-field make-configuration-field configuration-field?
>> + (name configuration-field-name)
>> + (type configuration-field-type)
>> + (getter configuration-field-getter)
>> +
On Sun 09 Oct 2016 08:43, Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:00:44AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next)[properties]: Set timeout to
>> 20 hours.
>
> Seems fine if that's how long it takes. Wow!
Yeah :/ Though with Ricardo's
Hi :)
I made an update to this patch before I saw your feedback. I fixed some
things. Some comments I will incorporate without reply. The mail below
replies only to those remaining parts.
On Thu 06 Oct 2016 22:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> +(define %cups-activation
>> + ;;
Am 10.10.2016 um 09:52 schrieb Alex Kost:
> Nice typo, I think it ment to be "add", right? :-)
Of course :-)
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
Hartmut Goebel (2016-10-10 09:40 +0200) wrote:
> Am 09.10.2016 um 23:33 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>> +(description "notifymuch displays desktop notifications for messages in
>> +the notmuch database. The notifications are sent using libnotify to a
>
> May I ask you to ass some words about
Am 09.10.2016 um 23:33 schrieb Christopher Baines:
> +(description "notifymuch displays desktop notifications for messages in
> +the notmuch database. The notifications are sent using libnotify to a
May I ask you to ass some words about what notmuch is? This saves the
ingenuous reader to
Am 09.10.2016 um 23:20 schrieb ren...@openmailbox.org:
>> Thanks, but I still cannot seem to apply it to master. Was this rebased
>> on top of current master?
>>
>> ~~ Ricardo
>
> I first make the patch for gucharmap and later bluefish, gucharmap is
> required for bluefish.
>
Ricado means: You
* gnu/packages/audio.scm (infamous-plugins): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/audio.scm | 31 +++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/audio.scm b/gnu/packages/audio.scm
index ff09c69..4d1505a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/audio.scm
+++
Thanks for your review. The version (0.1) is specified in the setup.py file,
but your right in saying that there is no "real" 0.1 version release. I've also
removed inputs from the wrap-binary stage.
* gnu/packages/mail.scm (notifymuch): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/mail.scm | 50 ++
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
index baa5a96..02dd72a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mail.scm
+++
57 matches
Mail list logo