[PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!)

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Ludo, > >>> Here are some important items I can think of: > […] >>> • Guile 2.2 compiler terrible issue: >>> . > > One way to side-step this issue for the upcoming release

Re: gnu/services/shepherd.scm:90:2: In procedure allocate-struct: Wrong type argument in position 2: 5

Oleg Pykhalov writes: > Maxim Cournoyer writes: > >> There shouldn't be any auto-compilation going on with Guix unless you are >> using Emacs-Guix. This has been fixed in a recent commit[1] but will only >> appear in the next release. >> >> In the

Re: Release!

Hi Recardo, Hi Ludo, > >> • Merge the potluck! > About that… We now have a JSON importer, so maybe it’s worth using the > even simpler JSON package format instead of the simplified S-expression > format that Andy proposed. What do you think? Should we discuss

Re: FOSDEM 2018 Guile devroom

Hi Manolis, > Unfortunately I have bad news. Our proposal for a devroom at FOSDEM 2018 > has not been accepted. That’s too bad! Thank you (and others who worked on the proposal) for your initiative, though! > We also have the option of organizing a fringe event or a hackathon in > the Friday

Re: Reproducible Build Summit, Oct. 31st, Berlin

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Sorry for the late notice: the Reproducible Build Summit will take place > from Oct. 31st to Nov. 2nd in Berlin this year: > > https://reproducible-builds.org/events/berlin2017/ > In the two previous editions, there were always 2 or 3 Guix there: > Manolis, John,

Re: Release!

Hi Ludo, >> Here are some important items I can think of: […] >> • Guile 2.2 compiler terrible issue: >> . One way to side-step this issue for the upcoming release is to use one Guile process per file when running “guix

Re: gnu/services/shepherd.scm:90:2: In procedure allocate-struct: Wrong type argument in position 2: 5

Maxim Cournoyer writes: > There shouldn't be any auto-compilation going on with Guix unless you are > using Emacs-Guix. This has been fixed in a recent commit[1] but will only > appear in the next release. > > In the mean time you could define the following in your

NFS mounts

Hi Guixers, does anyone have an example of a system configuration that mounts an NFS share at boot time? It seems that this requires some extra services and also some additional packages (to have mount.nfs for example). Konrad.

Re: Status of "GuixOps"?

Hi! "Thompson, David" skribis: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Hartmut Goebel > wrote: [...] >> Q1: I did not follow the development closely, but I seem to recall that >> there is some guix sub-command for configuring a remote

Re: Release!

Heya! Christopher Baines skribis: > Unfortunately, building the ISO image has broken since I was > successfully using it [1]. Oops, weird. Let’s investigate. > One other issue I was thinking of recently was the size of the image. I > checked an ISO of the installation

Re: QT install and search paths

Hallo, I just posted to patch-series for this. - 28719 is your (unchanged) and my patches for changing the directory layout - 28720 are enhancements to KDE framework Please review these patches. Thanks! Both series are available on the "wip-qt-paths" branch. I suggest to push both series to