On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:23:32 -0400
Julien Lepiller wrote:
> The translation project is already hosted outside the guix project,
> so I don't see any issue if we're not able to package it just yet.
>
> hosted.weblate.org has some tracking in place (a matomo instance
> hosted by the weblate
On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 15:48 +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Dear Roel,
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 14:46, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> > > > If there is interest in having this as a "load-profile" subcommand, I
> > > > will
> > > > post
> > > > an initial implementation to the mailing list ASAP.
> > >
> > >
zimoun writes:
> Argh! The author should watch the Fun MOOC about computational
> reproducibility. ;-)
That would probably help. I'll pass on the message ;-)
I have also opened an issue for this:
https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/issues/2
> Grafts or maybe Guile 2 -> 3?
Dear Roel,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 14:46, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > > If there is interest in having this as a "load-profile" subcommand, I will
> > > post
> > > an initial implementation to the mailing list ASAP.
> >
> > Instead of another subcommand, I would suggest to add an option to
> > "guix
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 14:44, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
>
> Konrad Hinsen writes:
>
> > One question I have been wondering about is the possibility of grafts
> > being an obstacle to reproducibility. Grafts are something I don't
> > really understand yet, so I cannot answer this
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
>> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
>> and I see this weird thing:
>>
>> --
>> substitute: updating substitutes from
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:17:06PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>> > I reconfigured my Guix System based on core-updates, and afterwards I
>> > was unable to login, either remotely over SSH, or on the Linux console.
>>
>> Do you still have the
Dear Simon,
Thank you for your ideas!
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 18:54 +0200, zimoun wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Would there be any interest from others to have this as well? And also, the
> > shell implementation heavy relies on Bash. What other shells should I
> > attempt
> > to implement?
>
> It
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> One question I have been wondering about is the possibility of grafts
> being an obstacle to reproducibility. Grafts are something I don't
> really understand yet, so I cannot answer this question. In particular,
> does a grafted package get a different hash from a
sirgazil writes:
> And I've already seen that before (I mean those bars before the @ sign,
> etc.), but I don't know how it is supposed to be presented. That information
> usually makes no sense to me :P
This is definitely not supposed to be shown. Things like
@ download-progress
Leo Famulari writes:
> I'm doing `guix pull --branch=core-updates`, with a `guix describe` of
> commit a533c5a183 (core-updates from 2 weeks ago), on Debian, in tmux,
> and I see this weird thing:
>
> --
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://private.mirror'... 100.0%
> @
sirgazil writes:
> By the way, it would be great if someone could review this patch:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39069, which is supposed to fix bugs
> like this one: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/40686, which have
> been around for a long time and make the GNOME experience
Hi Konrad,
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 11:26, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
> > Has the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt' been tracked?
>
> Unfortunately not. The repository for the preparation of the post
> is at
>
> https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/
>
> but it doesn't contain
Hi Simon,
> Based on the nice blog post [1], instead of really travelling I just
> travel in time. :-)
> If I read correctly and if I did not do any mistake, the final hash is
> not the same now than before. It is not what I was expecting.
>
> Expected output (blog post):
>
sirgazil writes:
> it seems that the comments mechanism in
> issues.gnu.org does not work.
yes, sorry about that. There’s a problem with the environment in which
the mailer service runs. It’s on my list to investigate and fix it.
(The messages aren’t lost. They are stuck in the queue.)
15 matches
Mail list logo
