Re: Guile-SQLite3 0.1.1 released

2020-06-09 Thread Aleix Conchillo Flaqué
On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 2:20 PM Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > I’m pleased to announce Guile-SQLite3 version 0.1.1: > > git clone https://notabug.org/guile-sqlite3/guile-sqlite3.git > cd guile-sqlite3 > git checkout v0.1.1 > git tag -v v0.1.1 > > The ‘git tag -v’ command checks the

Guile-SQLite3 0.1.1 released

2020-06-09 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
I’m pleased to announce Guile-SQLite3 version 0.1.1: git clone https://notabug.org/guile-sqlite3/guile-sqlite3.git cd guile-sqlite3 git checkout v0.1.1 git tag -v v0.1.1 The ‘git tag -v’ command checks the authenticity of your checkout. You may need to retrieve the signing key first:

Re: Manual consistency

2020-06-09 Thread George Clemmer
zimoun writes: > (from: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/41253#10) > > On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 18:36, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> > There are many examples in guix.texi with $, and also many without. Plus >> > some with # as the command line prompt. >> I’ve come to the conclusion that snippets

[PATCH] sql: Add a couple of indexes.

2020-06-09 Thread Christopher Baines
Remove the Builds_index from the schema, as it would have been removed in error by the upgrade-6 upgrade. Add a specific index on the Builds status field, as this helps with db-get-builds queries, and add an index on the Outputs derivation field, as this helps with the db-get-outputs part of

Re: Manual consistency

2020-06-09 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 9 juin 2020 13:13:31 GMT-04:00, Ricardo Wurmus a écrit : > >Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Ricardo Wurmus skribis: >> >>> Julien Lepiller writes: >>> If there is a way to mark a sentence to wrap it into a class, we >could also do some CSS magic with :before. >>> >>>

Re: Manual consistency

2020-06-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Julien Lepiller writes: >> >>> If there is a way to mark a sentence to wrap it into a class, we could >>> also do some CSS magic with :before. >> >> Texinfo puts all examples inside div.example pre.example, but the >> individual

Re: Canonical-packages restoration.

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > With f30d84d32db0f4f6cb84e139868e1727a7dc0a51 and > dfc8ccbf5da96a67eb1cade499f0def21e7fdb02, I did remove most of the > "canonical-package" calls because they were breaking system > cross-compilation. > > Now, I'd like to somehow restore them, using the new

Re: Secrets in (generated) configs. How to deal with them?

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, raingloom skribis: > I'm trying to package Yggdrasil as a Guix service and I took a look at > what NixOS does and they actually don't simply generate the config in > the store, instead it's combined with another input of the service and > the combined JSON is fed to Yggdrasil on stdin. > >

Re: The size of ‘.go’ files

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Andy Wingo skribis: > A few points of information :) Much appreciated! > The guile.arities section starts with a sorted array of fixed-size > headers, then is followed by a sequence of ULEB128 references to local > variable names, including non-arguments. The size is a bit perplexing,

Re: Advice on package naming

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Hartmut, Hartmut Goebel skribis: > I'm still seeking advice on how to name these packages, since the > original packages have > quiet uncommon names. Shall I keep the names I'm currently using, or are > there any other suggestions? > > Current names: > > pep-engine > libpepadapter. >

Re: Manual consistency

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Julien Lepiller writes: > >> If there is a way to mark a sentence to wrap it into a class, we could >> also do some CSS magic with :before. > > Texinfo puts all examples inside div.example pre.example, but the > individual lines are not wrapped in spans, so we

Re: Heads-up: “pre-push” Git hook updated

2020-06-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2020-05-29, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >> >>> I think we should change our pre-push hook as shown below. >> >> I’ve pushed it in e65a44649e8d7698c4a888f1de625a67052520e9. >> To all committers: please do use it from now on: >> >> cp

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > A lighter system has the benefits of: > > - being easier on Internet bandwidth, > - updating faster. And obviously lighter and disk space! ;) -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Alexey Abramov
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > Alexey Abramov writes: > >> Do you consider gnome-keyring to be a part of gnome-minimal? > > I would say yes, but that's debatable of course :p > >> If you do, gcr - gnome keyring prompter should also be added. > > Are you saying the gnome-keyring won't work without

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Alexey Abramov
Hi Pierre, Do you consider gnome-keyring to be a part of gnome-minimal? If you do, gcr - gnome keyring prompter should also be added. -- Alexey

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
Thanks, Tobias! The definition below builds in a system, I haven't tried booting it yet: --8<---cut here---start->8--- (define-public gnome-minimal (package (inherit gnome) (name "gnome-minimal") (propagated-inputs ;; Keep nautilus.

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Jonathan Brielmaier 写道: So this is basically a plain Gnome shell withouth any programms? What is the use-case for it? s/without any programmes/with the programmes you actually choose to install/ ‘gnome-desktop’ is a maximal beast, and is only going to get more so as Raghav's work

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Pierre, Pierre Neidhardt 写道: guix/ui.scm:1945:12: In procedure run-guix-command: Throw to key `match-error' with args `("match" "no matching pattern" #f)'. --8<---cut here---end--->8--- Any idea? My immediate thought is: #f is what (assoc-ref l

Re: GNOME minimal

2020-06-09 Thread Jonathan Brielmaier
On 09.06.20 14:21, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Hi! > > I've defined a minimal GNOME this way: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > (define-public gnome-minimal > (package > (inherit gnome) > (name "gnome-minimal") > (propagated-inputs > ;; Keep

gcc-10 toolchain does not include string to numeric conversion functions like std::stoull

2020-06-09 Thread Erik Garrison
Hello guix-devel, I've run into a quirk in the various gcc toolchains that seems somewhat unique to guix builds of them. I'd like to understand if this is intentional. Initially, I found that string to numeric conversion functions that are enabled by _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_STDLIB are not available on

Re: Canonical-packages restoration.

2020-06-09 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hey Jan, > Just a quick question: why?; would that reduce a system's closure size? Yes mostly, even if the gains are not huge (~100MiB). However, I feel like its easier the tackle the system closure size issue if we get rid of the "noise". Thanks, Mathieu

Re: Canonical-packages restoration.

2020-06-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Mathieu Othacehe writes: > With f30d84d32db0f4f6cb84e139868e1727a7dc0a51 and > dfc8ccbf5da96a67eb1cade499f0def21e7fdb02, I did remove most of the > "canonical-package" calls because they were breaking system > cross-compilation. > > Now, I'd like to somehow restore them Just a quick question:

Canonical-packages restoration.

2020-06-09 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello, With f30d84d32db0f4f6cb84e139868e1727a7dc0a51 and dfc8ccbf5da96a67eb1cade499f0def21e7fdb02, I did remove most of the "canonical-package" calls because they were breaking system cross-compilation. Now, I'd like to somehow restore them, using the new "let-system". My idea is to define