This is a good point. The naming of `/manifest' does invite confusion
when first encountering it.
That said, I am pretty sure there is a place for `/manifest.scm'.
Given the `--manifest' option to several commands, it makes profiles first
class. In particular, it would let users easily `guix
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> elaexuo...@wilsonb.com skribis:
>> First, am I missing something? Is there a better/preferred way to make use of
>> the `manifest' files in profiles?
> You’re not missing anything: it’s a longstanding source of confusion
> that these ‘manifest’ files are not like
On 6/14/20 4:41 AM, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Hi Léo,
>
> As you know, I'm still investigating why the powerpc64-linux bootstrap
> binaries (really just GCC) are not reproducible [1]. Eventually, if we
> can't figure it out, we might want to just bite the bullet and use the
> non-reproducible
Hello Jan,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I’ve published a post about the second big reduction of the Guix
> bootstrap binaries
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
>
> Thanks to the recent merge of ‘core-updates’ some weeks days ago,
Hi Janneke,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:54:39 +0200
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> I’ve published a post about the second big reduction of the Guix
> bootstrap binaries
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
"again decided to sponsor this work" link is broken
zimoun writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 12:48, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
>>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>>> 65.7% substitutes available (9,425 out of 14,354)
>>> at least 57,816.3 MiB of nars (compressed)
>>> 97,343.9 MiB on disk
Hello,
Here's a wip patch for the website. It adds a new "download/latest"
page allowing to download the latest Guix System images from Cuirass.
I've merged all the required mechanisms in Guix and Cuirass, now most of
the remaining work is "cosmetic" (and that's not my cup of tea).
Anyway, the
Hello Guix!
I’ve published a post about the second big reduction of the Guix
bootstrap binaries
https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guix-further-reduces-bootstrap-seed-to-25/
Thanks to the recent merge of ‘core-updates’ some weeks days ago, the
set of bootstrap binaries now weighs in at
zimoun,
In response to your previous email, I gave a long-form reply to the general
discussion. However, I just want to note that the personal issue I am
encountering isn't with user profiles; instead it is with those generated by
`guix environment'.
In particular, I was trying to use `guix
> It is more "complicated" than that. The detailed explanations are in
> the mega thread. :-) In short and from my understanding, going from
> "/manifest" to "-m manifest.scm" cannot be done in the general
> case because two concepts -- imperative vs declarative -- are not well
> aligned.
Hi Chris,
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 12:48, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> 65.7% substitutes available (9,425 out of 14,354)
>> at least 57,816.3 MiB of nars (compressed)
>> 97,343.9 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
>> 0.010
Hi,
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at 17:24, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I think there were several issues we discussed:
>
> 1. We can only approximate that actual profile content; storing
> an approximate ‘manifest.scm’ along with the profile would IMO be
> deceptive.
>
> 2. It’s easy to
Dear,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 10:40, elaexuo...@wilsonb.com wrote:
> In an attempt to tar up the *build* environment for a package to share with a
> colleague, I encountered this:
>
> [env]$ guix pack -m $GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/manifest
> (manifest ...): Wrong number of arguments
>
> From
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I think there were several issues we discussed:
Allow me to reiterate, at the risk of bikeshedding... :)
> 1. We can only approximate that actual profile content; storing
> an approximate ‘manifest.scm’ along with the profile would IMO be
> deceptive.
14 matches
Mail list logo
