On November 19, 2020, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> [--without-tests] would encourage untested builds if I
> recall correctly
That may have been a concern (I wasn't part of the conversation) but I
don't see how the current implementation could do that. If a normal
"guix build foo" fails, then it's a
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'guix-manual' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/guix-manual/fr.po
(We can arrange things
Hi,
>> > http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-11-19.log#182349
>
>> Right, so I shouldn't have pushed to "wip-r" in the first place.
>
> Well, I think it is a lack of synchronisation between all of 3;
> especially with this work around via external GitHub upstream.
Yeah, sorry. I didn’t realize
Hi Roel,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 20:03, Roel Janssen wrote:
> > http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-11-19.log#182349
> Right, so I shouldn't have pushed to "wip-r" in the first place.
Well, I think it is a lack of synchronisation between all of 3;
especially with this work around via external
Hi Simon,
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 18:27 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Roel,
>
> Quick heads up of Ricardo from IRC.
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 17:25, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> > Well, they got removed from Savannah. Now I get this when I try to
> > push:
>
>
Hi Roel,
Quick heads up of Ricardo from IRC.
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 17:25, Roel Janssen wrote:
> Well, they got removed from Savannah. Now I get this when I try to
> push:
http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-11-19.log#182429
> $ git push -f origin wip-r
> Enumerating objects: 1599, done.
>
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 17:46, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> >I am still confused. Why cmake-minimal needs all the protocols that
> >curl supports? What I was expecting is that cmake-minimal depends on
> >curl-minimal and that both packages are minimal. :-)
>
> >Because all in all, we end with
Le 19 novembre 2020 10:33:10 GMT-05:00, zimoun a
écrit :
>Hi,
>
>On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:32, Efraim Flashner
>wrote:
>
>> > > > --8<---cut
>here---start->8---
>> > > > $ guix graph -t bag --path guix openldap
>> > > > guix@1.1.0-29.4e3ed9b
>> > > >
Hi,
> > To be concrete, the last commit on my branch is 9 days ago. And the
> > last commit on Savannah wip-r is 30th Otc.
>
> Yeah, because mine got removed.
Yeah, sorry. I think Ricardo pushed. The history is:
- I pushed on Tue Nov 10 16:31:17 to GitHub rewriting the history
- Ricardo
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:18 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 16:57, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> > My bad, I jumped to a conclusion too quickly. :)
>
> No worries. :-)
>
>
> > So, *something* removed my commits to the wip-r branch. Is it some
> > kind
> > of automation that syncs the
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 16:57, Roel Janssen wrote:
> My bad, I jumped to a conclusion too quickly. :)
No worries. :-)
> So, *something* removed my commits to the wip-r branch. Is it some kind
> of automation that syncs the Github and the Savannah branches?
Which upstream?
I have no access on
Hi Efraim,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 15:56:34 +0200
Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I think a better question is can cmake-minimal depend on a new
> curl-minimal, or does it even need curl at all?
In the course of debugging the "32 bit ARM on 64 bit host can't read
directories"
problem ("json-c") and
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 16:36 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 16:31, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> > I fixed the build of r-rhfd5lib.
>
> Cool!
>
> > It seems, however, that you removed all of my changes to the wip-r
> > branch. Why?
>
> Who is "you"? ;-)
> Personally, I did
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 16:31, Roel Janssen wrote:
> I fixed the build of r-rhfd5lib.
Cool!
> It seems, however, that you removed all of my changes to the wip-r
> branch. Why?
Who is "you"? ;-)
Personally, I did nothing; or I have nights that I am not aware. :-)
(Even, I do not have
Hi,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 15:32, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > > > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > > > $ guix graph -t bag --path guix openldap
> > > > guix@1.1.0-29.4e3ed9b
> > > > guile-ssh@0.13.1
> > > > libssh@0.9.5
> > > > cmake-minimal@3.16.5
> > > >
On Wed, 2020-11-18 at 17:59 +0100, zimoun wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 17:33, Roel Janssen wrote:
>
> > Okay. Then I'll look into it. I currently have only these left as
> > changed in my tree:
> > - r-atacseqqc: Needs r-rhdf5lib.
> > - r-cytoml: Needs r-rhdf5lib.
> > - r-scater: Needs
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 04:18:32PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:56:34PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:41:51PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> > > Dear,
> > >
> > > This morning I garbage-collected some old items and pulled. Well, I
> > > was
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:56:34PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:41:51PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> > Dear,
> >
> > This morning I garbage-collected some old items and pulled. Well, I
> > was then surprised that "guix environment guix" fetches 'openldap'.
> > Is it
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:41:51PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
> Dear,
>
> This morning I garbage-collected some old items and pulled. Well, I
> was then surprised that "guix environment guix" fetches 'openldap'.
> Is it expected?
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 22:24:29 +0100
raingloom wrote:
> Alpine already achieves an incredibly tiny install size by splitting
> packages into many outputs. We could and should do the same.
> As far as I know, they do not have parameterized packages.
That also depends on how far you want to go.
Last
Dear,
This morning I garbage-collected some old items and pulled. Well, I
was then surprised that "guix environment guix" fetches 'openldap'.
Is it expected?
--8<---cut here---start->8---
$ guix graph -t bag --path guix openldap
guix@1.1.0-29.4e3ed9b
Hi zimoun,
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:21:16 +0100
zimoun wrote:
> Let’s postpone this Docker image work and start a new fresh thread once
> v1.2.0 is published and the goal to have something for v1.3.0, well
> that’s my point of view.
After Ryan Prior's E-Mail I'm pretty sure my workaround of
Hi Danny,
Thank you for the explanations. Make sense. :-)
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 20:23, Danny Milosavljevic
wrote:
> No, I don't use docker that much--and when I do, it's to run simple images
> others have created. So I just really don't know how this is supposed to
> be set up. I mean
Hi!
zimoun writes:
> +`--with-c-toolchain`, and `--without-tests`. Consider this example:
Oh, I didn't notice we had a --without-tests now, good to know!
I remember asking about such an option a while back, but this was
refused on the ground that it would encourage untested builds if I
24 matches
Mail list logo
