Hi Bengt!
> ┌──┐
> │ "So I removed the comments." │
> └──┘
> Raghav, I think you may not grok the social signalling of a statement like
> that :)
My apologies! I didn't mean that with a negative connotation.
> It sounds like you are
Hi Mark!
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Please keep in mind that every comment in Guix was deliberately put
> there by a Guix developer, which means that at least one developer
> thought the comment was worth including.
>
> I'm concerned that you felt so confident in your assessment that
Hi Chris!
> In the context of writing Guix packages, propagating the necessary
> inputs to support other packages finding the library via pkg-config is a
> serious thing, not trivial. If it breaks, dependent packages will likely
> change in behaviour or stop building entirely.
I understand. I
Hi Marcus,
I uploaded your photo on Wikimedia Commons! [1][2] I hope it's OK ;-)
In fact, I am a little frustrated at the fact that the latest tarball is
no longer available on gnuradio.org. Not for me, but for GNU. Or at
least for Guix:
On 12/19/20 12:32 PM, christo...@poncy.fr wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
>
Oops! Realized I forgot to add a subject line to the e-mail. Sorry for
the noise, I kindly invite you to ignore this thread, and reply to the
one I have just sent.
CHristophe
Hi Marcus,
I uploaded your photo on Wikimedia Commons! [1][2] I hope it's OK ;-)
In fact, I am a little frustrated at the fact that the latest tarball is
no longer available on gnuradio.org. Not for me, but for GNU. Or at
least for Guix:
