Re: ZFS on Guix

Hi Joshua, > raid5atemyhomework raid5atemyhomew...@protonmail.com writes: > > > The patchset currently dying on issues.guix.gnu.org would provide a nice > > simple single-step way to enable very basic ZFS support on your Guix > > system. Until it gets merged, however, you can still enable very

Re: ZFS on Guix

raid5atemyhomework writes: > The patchset currently dying on issues.guix.gnu.org would provide a nice > simple single-step way to enable *very basic* ZFS support on your Guix > system. Until it gets merged, however, you can still enable *very very > basic* ZFS support on your Guix system by

Re: ZFS on Guix

I just wanted to say that I'm not ignoring your patch, I'm just not qualified to review it. I hope someone steps up to it--otherwise I can't really tell whether (mbegin %state-monad...) inside a random service procedure is a good idea. Then again, provenance-service-type does it and there it

Re: ZFS on Guix

Greetings guix-developers and other people trying to use Guix, The patchset currently dying on issues.guix.gnu.org would provide a nice simple single-step way to enable *very basic* ZFS support on your Guix system. Until it gets merged, however, you can still enable *very very basic* ZFS

Re: Would a Guix QA page be helpful?

Hi Bengt, On Sun, 07 Feb 2021 at 22:13, Bengt Richter wrote: > On +2021-02-06 20:20:04 +, Christopher Baines wrote: >> The Guix Data Service has been getting better at finding problems, but >> getting that data requires knowing it exists, and where to find it, and >> clicking all the

Re: Would a Guix QA page be helpful?

Hi Chris, On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 at 20:20, Christopher Baines wrote: > I've been wondering if it would be good to have a QA page that just > summarises and links to this information, things like: > > - Broken packages > - Broken system tests > - Broken fixed output package derivations > - Lint

Re: Would a Guix QA page be helpful?

Hi Chris, On Sat, 06 Feb 2021 20:20:04 + Christopher Baines wrote: > Hey, > > The Guix Data Service has been getting better at finding problems, but > getting that data requires knowing it exists, and where to find it, > and clicking all the relevant links. Absolutely yes! I already

Re: Would a Guix QA page be helpful?

Hi Christopher, tl;dr: +1 :) On +2021-02-06 20:20:04 +, Christopher Baines wrote: > Hey, > > The Guix Data Service has been getting better at finding problems, but > getting that data requires knowing it exists, and where to find it, and > clicking all the relevant links. > > I've been

Re: Building the core-updates branch.

On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 07:43:50PM +0100, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > > Turns out "core-updates" is still configured to build the "core" subset, > > I don't really understand why the evaluation 74281 triggered the build > > of so many packages. > > Just fixed it with

Re: Building the core-updates branch.

> Turns out "core-updates" is still configured to build the "core" subset, > I don't really understand why the evaluation 74281 triggered the build > of so many packages. Just fixed it with 2c30440f89244202bddebe76f90c6b0b8145ba5d on maintenance repository. We will now be building 87 jobs

Re: Building the core-updates branch.

Hey Ludo, > Agreed, I think that was the intent. Can we make it focus on the ‘core’ > subset? How does one do that nowadays? Looks like my sqlite3/Cuirass > foo is no longer helpful. :-) Turns out "core-updates" is still configured to build the "core" subset, I don't really understand why

Re: Blog post about the upcoming FOSDEM + Guix Day

Just a reminder: tomorrow we have a GNU Guix day online! Free for all. See https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/FOSDEM2021 Starts at 5am UTC with a Greek breakfast and runs all day until we are done! See the link in above page. Pj.