Re: Improving the quality of Python packages

2021-04-11 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Lars-Dominik Braun writes: > Hi Ricardo, > >> Is there a way we can improve the quality of those Python packages that >> have tests disabled? I’d like to gain more confidence in these packages >> and be sure that at least all dependencies are among the inputs. > there is a new sanity check

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

2021-04-11 Thread jgart
Ryan et al, Some notes follow: What can we do about the bundled jquery and bootstrap here? https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/tree/master/item/_static/jquery https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/tree/master/item/_static/bootstrap The jquery and bootstrap code is required by this jinja

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

2021-04-11 Thread Ryan Prior
On April 11, 2021, jgart wrote: > package fosspay for guix and write a service for it Nice idea, that looks like a really useful little service. If any Guix maintainers are supported by community donations, send your links so we can pitch in!

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

2021-04-11 Thread jgart
I think one sustainable (no pun intended) way to proceed is to package fosspay for guix and write a service for it: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/ I created a public kanban board entry for it below to get started: https://board.disroot.org/project/guix-packaging/us/677?kanban-status=12312

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

2021-04-11 Thread Joshua Branson
ilmu writes: > Hi guys, > > A bit crazy maybe but how about we completely redefine what money is? Sure, why not? That's what guix is all about. Let's dare new things! > > I wrote "this" (the attachment or http://datalisp.is) over the weekend > (in one sitting! very raw, sorry if it's hard to

Re: Improving the quality of Python packages

2021-04-11 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi Ricardo, > Is there a way we can improve the quality of those Python packages that > have tests disabled? I’d like to gain more confidence in these packages > and be sure that at least all dependencies are among the inputs. there is a new sanity check phase on core-updates, which should solve

Re: Please review blog post draft: powerpc64le-linux support

2021-04-11 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi, This is the final draft, I think. I intend to commit it to the "posts" directory in guix-artwork on Monday morning, USA time, at which point I believe it will automatically show up on the blog. Thank you again for your help, everyone! If you see any last-minute typos, please do let me

Re: Please review blog post draft: powerpc64le-linux support

2021-04-11 Thread Chris Marusich
Hi Tobias, Thank you very much for taking the time to review the blog post! Tobias Platen writes: > On Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:59:44 +0200 > Léo Le Bouter wrote: > >> On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 09:37 -0700, Chris Marusich wrote: >> > They also say in that Twitter thread: "We have been putting together

Re: meson-build-system cross compilation

2021-04-11 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hi Danny! since you have been using meson build system a lot, could you add support for cross-compilation to guix/build-system/meson.scm please? I would do it myself if I knew how. See https://issues.guix.gnu.org/44244 See also https://mesonbuild.com/Cross-compilation.html As it is now,