Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 18:36 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
>> Hi Liliana,
>>
>> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>> > In my personal opinion, the version+raw commit style can be
>> > discredited using Cantor's diagonal argument.
>>
>> You've
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Am Mittwoch, dem 29.12.2021 um 20:13 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
[...]
>> The simple fact is that the way Ricardo wrote the 'guile-aiscm' package
>> is the right way to ensure that it can be reliably reproduced in the
>> future.
> And here I
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 18:36 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> > In my personal opinion, the version+raw commit style can be
> > discredited using Cantor's diagonal argument.
>
> You've mentioned Cantor's diagonalization argument at least
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 18:56 -0500 schrieb Mark H Weaver:
> Hi Liliana,
>
> Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>
> > Git commit hashes do not just depend on the content. They also
> > depend on how much effort you put into solving a proof of work
> > challenge that won't ever earn you crypto
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Git commit hashes do not just depend on the content. They also depend
> on how much effort you put into solving a proof of work challenge that
> won't ever earn you crypto coins [1].
My knowledge of git is admittedly not that strong, but my
Hi Liliana,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> In my personal opinion, the version+raw commit style can be discredited
> using Cantor's diagonal argument.
You've mentioned Cantor's diagonalization argument at least twice in
this thread so far, but although I'm familiar with that kind of argument
Hi,
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 18:21 +0100 schrieb zimoun:
> Redundancy adds one kind of robustness: resilience. [...] However
> this assumes all the redundant nodes of the web of nets will be still
> up, at least enough to have this… robustness. Me too, I hope Guix
> will be popular and
On 2021-12-28, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> Consider a package being added or updated in Guix. At the time of
> commit, we have the tag v1.2.3 pointing towards commit deadbeef. We
> therefore create a guix package with version "1.2.3" pointing to said
> commit (either directly or indirectly).
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 16:19, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> You're also missing the part in which it currently relies on a single
> server to do all this, but there are plans to move it out to multiple
> ones, i.e. adding fallbacks/redundancy to your fallback mechanism,
> which for the
Hi,
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 14:15 +0100 schrieb zimoun:
> [...]
> Version is also Guix specific. Sometimes, we patch; for security
> reasons, for fixing a bug, for quickly backporting something, for
> removing non-free bits, for unbundling stuff, for making work with
> the rest of Guix
Hi all,
On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 10:31, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I have no strong feelings for or against any of the proposed options. I
> think that using raw commits might not be great for our tooling because
> we’re not reusing an existing version string and would need to remember
> to update
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Particularly here, you're used to raw commit hashes, so you no longer
> feel the need to add a comment explaining that it corresponds to a
> given tag, which others (such as myself, your past self and possibly
> your future self) would need at least until they
Am Donnerstag, dem 30.12.2021 um 16:01 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> I updated a section of the cookbook so that it was still useful after
> some changes in Guix:
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=c7d74a9bccfc1b1274fc8754a6e78bb6887c7fea
>
> There was also a blog post
Hi Ricardo,
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 10:31 +0100 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus:
> In the past I’ve also added a comment above the raw commit, stating
> that it corresponds to the given version.
>
> I have no strong feelings for or against any of the proposed
> options. I think that using raw
Hi,
Am Freitag, dem 31.12.2021 um 08:57 +0100 schrieb Taylan Kammer:
> On 31.12.2021 04:15, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote:
> > [...] Obviously,
> > when travelling back in time, we want Guix' "1.2.3" to be whatever
> > it was by that point, but on
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
>> And for completeness, let quote Ludo again from the same thread. :-)
>>
>> No, I think we should consider always referring to commits
>> instead of tags. It’s annoying from a readability viewpoint,
>> but it would ensure
16 matches
Mail list logo
