Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-11 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > ‘guix weather -s i686-linux’ says 89% (which is underestimated, because > it wrongfully checks for all the packages, including unsupported > packages), which sounds good. > > We have to check for AArch64 & co. Any takers? Sorry for the delay. I've built some

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-11 Thread Efraim Flashner
On June 11, 2022 9:53:14 AM UTC, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: >Hi, > >Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> My main concern is that so few of the missing items are queued to be >> built. > >I wonder if that info is accurate. > >For instance, https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/716980/details shows the

Re: U.S. Midwest based build farm

2022-06-11 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-06-11, Maxime Devos wrote: > jbra...@dismail.de schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 16:06 [+]: >> What's good and/or bad about this idea? > > A positive point: extra resources, could be useful for reproducibility > testing, ...? > > A negative point: extra points through with malware can be

Re: U.S. Midwest based build farm

2022-06-11 Thread jbranso
June 11, 2022 4:00 PM, "Maxime Devos" wrote: > jbra...@dismail.de schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 16:06 [+]: > >> What's good and/or bad about this idea? > > A positive point: extra resources, could be useful for reproducibility > testing, ...? That's actually a good idea. I could give

Re: U.S. Midwest based build farm

2022-06-11 Thread Maxime Devos
jbra...@dismail.de schreef op za 11-06-2022 om 16:06 [+]: > What's good and/or bad about this idea? A positive point: extra resources, could be useful for reproducibility testing, ...? A negative point: extra points through with malware can be introduced (->compromises). Can be solved by

U.S. Midwest based build farm

2022-06-11 Thread jbranso
Hey guix, I live near a big university that sells old Dell 7020 optiplex machines. So each desktop machine costs about $200 - $250, depending on how the current market rate is for hard drive and RAM. My current landlord has an unused basement. It should be somewhat easy to get an ethernet cord

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-11 Thread Tom Fitzhenry
Ludovic Courtès writes: > It went from 17.1% to 17.3% in two days, even though the AArch64 > machines have been busy all along it seems. Maybe they’ve been > processing the backlog that had accumulated on ‘master’ rather than the > things we care about. Per https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55848,

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Efraim Flashner skribis: > My main concern is that so few of the missing items are queued to be > built. I wonder if that info is accurate. For instance, https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/716980/details shows the derivation for /gnu/store/2smylcjq5cppxcrj2mn229hlmh6bf7w4-libxft-2.3.3. It is

Re: On commit access, patch review, and remaining healthy

2022-06-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Thiago Jung Bauermann skribis: > The binutils-gdb repo has a Python script to generate a skeleton > ChangeLog. I don't know how well it would work for Scheme patches: > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=contrib/mklog.py;hb=HEAD I believe the ‘etc/committer.scm’

Re: Merging ‘staging’?

2022-06-11 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 09:02:14PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote: > I will try again with staging at 091eb323ba27. But it will take a > long time; feel free to proceed regardless. All my manifest built and runs on rock64 aarch64. Thank you all! Regards, Florian