On 2022-06-07, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> kias...@disroot.org writes:
>
>> I've been watching the Repology page for Guix and I've noticed that
>> we've dropped to 51% outdated packages
>> [https://repology.org/repository/gnuguix]. We used to be at 40%
>> outdated packages a few months ago.
>
>
Hi everyone,
Thanks for this write-up and discussion Andrew. I'm also following along in [0]
but I'll just chime in here for now.
When I saw this I was worried since I also "just" use subkeys, meaning for all
signing etc. only my subkey is used. These are set to expire each year and then
I
On 11-08-2022 16:26, Andrew Tropin wrote:
* What to do after?
- Accept subkey on guix pull if master key is in .guix-authorizations.
As I've now written on 57091, this would cause security problems with
old or revoked keys.
Greetings,
Maxime.
OpenPGP_0x49E3EE22191725EE.asc
Description:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 7:27 AM Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
> Re: [POSTMORTEM]
I have likewise used those words to describe concluding reports or to
communicate lessons learned, but upon reflection I now prefer
"incident summary" or "debrief". [1] Since both of my suggested
replacements are
* Summary
On 2022-08-06 the commit 3946540[fn:1] was pushed and lead to failing
guix pull:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
guix pull: error: commit 39465409f0481f27d252ce25d2b02d3f5cbc6723 not
signed by an authorized key: 2841 9AC6 5038 7440 C7E9 2FFA 2208 D209
Andreas Enge writes:
> Since it replaces a broken package by a more modern broken package, I still
> took the liberty to push, but it would be nice if someone with knowledge of
> python and/or symengine could have a look. Disabling the tests makes the
> compilation succeed, but it would be nice
