Re: Failed to build in QA

On October 5, 2023 10:49:06 AM GMT+02:00, Christopher Baines wrote: > >"reza.housse...@gmail.com" writes: > >> I submitted an issue to guix. But QA refuses to build it [1]. I have >> no clue what the problem is, can anyone shed light on a possible >> resolution? > >You pretty much found the

Re: GUI for Guix

Ludovic Courtès writes: > The only thing broken for me is completion in shell-mode FWIW, as an alternative, emacs-bash-completion () works quite well for completion in shell-mode. I unintern pcomplete/guix and use it in its stead. -- Suhail

Re: [RFC]: Skipping rust crate tests by default

As a developer, the majority of the package build failures I encounter are from failed tests, so I agree with this proposal. I also like the idea of clients testing their own packages instead of trusting the substitute server. And if the new tests would catch more packaging bugs, that would be

Re: New section to easily reference Debbugs URLs within Emacs Debbugs

Hi, Mekeor Melire writes: > Thanks, Maxim, for implementing some of my suggestions in commit > 06dc36ffb7cde821a4762b299d1c95b3788ba110, as I coincidentally found > out when reading the commit log. > > By the way, I still believe it's less off-putting for average people > to see two lines of

Re: [RFC]: Skipping rust crate tests by default

Hi Ephraim, On Thu, Oct 05 2023, Efraim Flashner wrote: > I propose changing the cargo-build-system to have '#:tests? #f' by > default At first sight, it appears improper to turn off tests because they fail. Please allow me to remind everyone that build-time tests cover only a small proportion

Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi Guixers! In light of the several high profile CVEs this month, which were/are being handled and more coming (curl joins the chat) some of us were discussing improving and systematizing our security team and responses. My thanks to Tobias for quick review to help finalize the XOrg CVE

[RFC]: Skipping rust crate tests by default

Currently for for rust crates we build the crates, run the tests, and then in %output we only have the license files and a repackaged version of the source. The build system goes: unpack source unpack crates patch shebangs patch checksums of the crates 'build 'package 'check 'install 'install is

Re: [bug#66343] Add more setups to Guix docs

Thank you all for the collaboration!

Re: [bug#66343] Add more setups to Guix docs

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 08:55:32PM +, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > > It looks good to me. > > Commit? Looks good to me too. Patch pushed! -- Efraim Flashner רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or

Re: Failed to build in QA

On 2023-10-05 at 09:49+01:00, Christopher Baines wrote: > I've triggered QA to reapply the patches now (by deleting the > issue-66262 branch), so hopefully things will work better this time. Could you try the same for https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/64222? It's stuck at unknown and that's why

Re: Failed to build in QA

"reza.housse...@gmail.com" writes: > I submitted an issue to guix. But QA refuses to build it [1]. I have > no clue what the problem is, can anyone shed light on a possible > resolution? You pretty much found the problem, the relevant line on the page you linked to is: [ 6/ 50] loading...

Failed to build in QA

Hi list I submitted an issue to guix. But QA refuses to build it [1]. I have no clue what the problem is, can anyone shed light on a possible resolution? Best, Reza [1] https://data.qa.guix.gnu.org/job/49591#bottom -- Sent from /e/ Mail.