Hi all,
On 4/11/24 06:49, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Am Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 02:56:24PM +0200 schrieb Ekaitz Zarraga:
>> I think it's just better to
>> obtain the exact same code that is easy to find
> The exact same code as what? Actually I often wonder when looking for
> a project and end up with a
Hi again,
On 4/12/24 23:50, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> general reminder: please remember the specific scope of this (sub)thread
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
> Please consider that this (sub)thread is _not_ specific to xz-utils but
> to the
> Maybe some feedback on the Emacs side about this? There are indeed very
> few places where systemd sd_* functions are called in emacs.c, should we
> try and re-implement them instead of using the library as is? Would that
> be a contribution Emacs devs would be interested in? That would
>
Hello,
I just want to mention that I am still in CC and my mail server is going
offline. Need to optimize my budget and don't have any time for GNU
anymore because of university.
--
Christian Miller
Am 10/04/2024 um 16:05 schrieb Matt:
We're working through a list of feedback one item at
On 2024-04-12 22:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Graves skribis:
>
>> As promised to Stefan a few months ago, here's a use case of
>> Shepherd/Emacs implementation that we developped in RDE.
>
> Would be nice to have it in Guix Home!
Something like this seems to work:
On 2024-04-13 16:20, Nicolas Graves wrote:
> On 2024-04-12 22:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> Nicolas Graves skribis:
>>
>>> As promised to Stefan a few months ago, here's a use case of
>>> Shepherd/Emacs implementation that we developped in RDE.
>>
>> Would be nice to have it
On 2024-04-12 22:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Graves skribis:
>
>> As promised to Stefan a few months ago, here's a use case of
>> Shepherd/Emacs implementation that we developped in RDE.
>
> Would be nice to have it in Guix Home!
I am commited to merge RDE contributions
Hello Skyler,
Skyler Ferris writes:
> On 4/12/24 23:50, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>> general reminder: please remember the specific scope of this (sub)thread
[...]
>> (https://yhetil.org/guix/8734s1mn5p@xelera.eu/)
>>
>> ...and if needed read that message again to understand the context,
Matt writes:
> #+begin_quote
> 3.7 After System Installation
> L27 Libera_Chat, why the underscore. It is colored as well for me so
> I guess this is a special char. Should be anways just Libera Chat
> #+end_quote
>
> "Libera_Chat" is not, or no longer, in the docs (d3fe763fe3).
> However, there
Hello Matt. Thank you for fixing the oversight. However:
Matt writes:
> From: Matthew Trzcinski
> Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 10:12:05 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix cross-references
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Setting Up the Daemon): use @xref to start sentence.
> (Build Systems): capitalize "python"
On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 22:16:39 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote ---
> > See @ref{Substitutes} for how to allow the daemon to download pre-built
> > binaries.
>
> Nitpick: this works but I believe the recommended approach is
> “@xref{Substitutes} for how…”.
>
>
>
Hi Attila,
sorry for the delay in my reply,
I'm asking myself if this (sub)thread should be "condensed" in a
dedicated RFC (are RFCs official workflows in Guix, now?); if so, I
volunteer to file such an RFC in the next weeks.
Attila Lendvai writes:
>> Are there other issues (different from
Hello,
general reminder: please remember the specific scope of this (sub)thread
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Please consider that this (sub)thread is _not_ specific to xz-utils but
to the specific attack vector (matrix?) used to inject a backdoor in a
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ekaitz Zarraga skribis:
>
>> On 2024-04-04 21:48, Attila Lendvai wrote:
>>> all in all, just by following my gut insctincts, i was advodating
>>> for building everything from git even before the exposure of this
>>> backdoor. in fact, i found it surprising as a
14 matches
Mail list logo
