After having emailed Pierre Neidhardt, he kindly directed me to express my
Common Lisp Guix package
proposal here.
I have for a short while been mulling over a proposal for an alternative and
purely declarative
method of defining Common Lisp packages, with the intention of being far
simpler in
>Have you looked at lisp-utils.scm? I think it incorporates some of your ideas
>already. It could perhaps be generalized following your ideas so that it works
>for all Lisps out of the box.
I've not. I did a cursory search for this as well, but didn't find anything.
Would you be so kind
as to
>Sure: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm
I've only taken a look at lisp-utils.scm so far. I can see it explicitly
supports sbcl and ecl.
It's possible to get most or all of this in purely portable Common Lisp, which
would make adding
more implementations r