Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.)

2018-11-04 Thread Programmer
After having emailed Pierre Neidhardt, he kindly directed me to express my Common Lisp Guix package proposal here. I have for a short while been mulling over a proposal for an alternative and purely declarative method of defining Common Lisp packages, with the intention of being far simpler in

Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.)

2018-11-08 Thread Programmer
>Have you looked at lisp-utils.scm? I think it incorporates some of your ideas >already. It could perhaps be generalized following your ideas so that it works >for all Lisps out of the box. I've not. I did a cursory search for this as well, but didn't find anything. Would you be so kind as to

Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.)

2018-11-09 Thread Programmer
>Sure: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/build/lisp-utils.scm I've only taken a look at lisp-utils.scm so far. I can see it explicitly supports sbcl and ecl. It's possible to get most or all of this in purely portable Common Lisp, which would make adding more implementations r