> P.S. The code above should read (requirements ...) in the plural.
inside shepherd there's a bit of anomaly, but it's called requirement in the
public API, and also in the guix side of the config; i.e. it's not plural.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Moderation in
There are 51 new test failures which all appear to be related to FIPS.
For example:
modutil -dbdir
/tmp/guix-build-nss-3.99.drv-0/nss-3.99/tests_results/security/localhost.1/fips
-fips true
WARNING: Performing this operation while the browser is running could cause
corruption of your security
From: Zheng Junjie
* gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss)[arguments]<#:make-flags>: When
cross-compilation, Add CROSS_COMPILE=1.
<#:phases>: When cross-compilation, Set env NATIVE_CC to gcc.
Change-Id: I5c9559a4b8cecf2cfc6c47d136d69c01a335faaf
Signed-off-by: Zheng Junjie
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 7
Hi,
I've got as far as making nss 3.98 reproducible, however updating it to 3.99
results in 51 test failures. These are regressions, and worked correctly for
3.98. I'm not entirely sure what the issue is, but I've run out of time to
debug it this week, so I'm sending this patch up as is.
Up to
From: Zheng Junjie
* gnu/packages/nss.scm (nspr)[arguments]<#:configure-flags>: When
cross-compilation, Add HOST_CC=gcc.
Change-Id: I337f217f153f8cc3a713906643d6fab9115056e9
Signed-off-by: Zheng Junjie
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss): Update to 3.99.
Change-Id: Iba6c9dc2956cc0febb62a1c471add899250fa489
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/nss.scm b/gnu/packages/nss.scm
index b608a995577..80667d8affe 100644
---
gnu/packages/patches/nss-Disable-library-signing.patch: Disable library
signing to make the build reproducible.
gnu/packages/nss.scm (nss): Apply this new patch.
Change-Id: I7860bae219ecc4a79423a590c27a1097ae2e7874
---
gnu/packages/nss.scm | 3 +-
gnu/packages/certs.scm (nss-certs-3.88.1): New variable.
(nss-certs-3.98): Update and rename to nss-certs-3.99.
(nss-certs): Update to 3.99.
Change-Id: I2f5f737d44d08497d4f5e0e07557be36d2f1f070
---
gnu/packages/certs.scm | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Apr 23 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> I submitted a patch [..] at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70542. If this
> winds up merged I believe your code could be rewritten [as]
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (file-system
>(device
seems like a `guix pull` and a `guix home reconfigure` resolved it.
sorry for the noise.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“If you wind up with a boring, miserable life because you listened to your mom,
your dad, your teacher, your priest, or some guy on TV telling you how
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:25:47PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
> writes:
>
> > Is there an interface to rewrite / update a field from a series of
> > packages easily?
>
> We have "update-package-inputs" in (guix
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 02:21:56PM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Almost a year ago, the branching strategy was changed [1][2].
>
> 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63459
> 2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00024.html
>
> I think these changes have gone OK,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 01:56:12PM +0100, Steve George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 Apr, Kaelyn wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024 at 11:08 PM, Steve George
> > wrote:
> (...)
> > > - guile-rsvg failing
> > > - https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70537
> > > - I'm able to
Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
writes:
> Is there an interface to rewrite / update a field from a series of
> packages easily?
We have "update-package-inputs" in (guix upstream), which defines a
local procedure "update-field". Perhaps you can use
Hi,
On 25 Apr, Kaelyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024 at 11:08 PM, Steve George
> wrote:
(...)
> > - guile-rsvg failing
> > - https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70537
> > - I'm able to build librsvg@2.56.4 but not guile-rsvg
> > - guile-rsvg@2.18.1 / guile2.2-rsvg
> >
...when trying to build a guix checkout.
to reproduce:
$ make doc/images/service-graph.png
DOT doc/images/service-graph.png
Error: Could not set character size
[error message repeated 12 more times]
this seems to be an error coming from graphviz. this is all i could find
online, which
Is there an interface to rewrite / update a field from a series of
packages easily?
What I get from the change in python-team last change for the
pyproject-build-system is that we need to add python-setuptools or
python-wheel to all packages that will complain about it, when trying to
build.
Hello!
On Thu, Apr 25 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Clément Lassieur writes:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 03 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>>
>>> It's been Guix policy to let people choose whether to install or not TLS
>>> root certificates and which one to their machine. While I applaud the
>>> idea to
Hi,
On Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024 at 11:08 PM, Steve George
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We're trying to stabilise and merge core-updates, help definitely wanted!
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70456
>
> So far the main blockers are:
>
> - guile-rsvg failing
> -
Steve George writes:
> I think we should strongly recommend against long-running unmerged branches.
>
> Perhaps there could be a recommendation to merge every 3 months.
My hope is that with these process changes, we won't end up with
long-running branches.
Maybe we could add a recommendation,
Hi,
I believe I have a fix for this, I'm just waiting on my machine to hurry
up and confirm it, might end up running over night, then I'll send my
patch up.
I'm doing two native builds and two cross-builds.
I've also updated to 3.99.
Kind regards,
Christina
On 25/04/2024 15:06, Christina
Hi Guix,
Just to let you know, I just added a working patch series that does this
job on (guix build, guix import pypi, guix lint). This is not the full
patch series, which I have rebased on python-team, but it should be good
enough
1) to test it
2) to review it for a v2 that would be more
Hello!
Clément Lassieur writes:
> On Wed, Apr 03 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>
>> It's been Guix policy to let people choose whether to install or not TLS
>> root certificates and which one to their machine. While I applaud the
>> idea to have the users make a conscious decision about it, in
Hi Steve,
It would be good to confirm this one:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40316
Still fails to reproduce with those changes applied.
The culprit is in nss/cmd/shlibsign/shlibsign.c:
shlibSignHMAC generates a new key-pair each time it's run:
/* Generate a DSA key
Hi,
I think we should strongly recommend against long-running unmerged branches.
Perhaps there could be a recommendation to merge every 3 months.
Could we add any automation to remind people if:
1. a branch has been unmerged for more than 3 months
2. an odd merge takes places (e.g. the
Hi Guix-ers,
Please see the below message (and attached report for further details)
of a potential security issue and mitigation in Guix, from Skyler
Ferris. The very short version: 'make authenticate' is a potential
attack vector, which can be mitigated by using 'guix git authenticate'
in a
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:58:22AM -0400, Jason Conroy wrote:
>
> Efraim Flashner writes:
> > On the other hand, by generating it during the build of each package we
> > make sure to pull in all the crates which exist in the build, so we
> > could add into a profile/manifest just the crates
Efraim Flashner writes:
On the other hand, by generating it during the build of each
package we
make sure to pull in all the crates which exist in the build, so
we
could add into a profile/manifest just the crates listed in a
Cargo.toml
and then each crate would pull in its own
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:54:02PM -0400, Jason Conroy wrote:
>
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > Currently if you were to pull in rust-rand-0.8 and rust-rand-0.7 then
> > you'd have both rand-0.*.crate files in the registry but only one of
> > them would be listed in
Okay, I'll let you know as soon as I know.
On 24/04/2024 14:17, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
You just need to checkout core-updates and then 'start building'!
It would be good to confirm this one:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40316
It looks like Zhen Junjie applied two patches
Hey!
Almost a year ago, the branching strategy was changed [1][2].
1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63459
2: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-06/msg00024.html
I think these changes have gone OK, we've had ~27 [3] branches merged in
this manor and I think looking back these
Hi,
You just need to checkout core-updates and then 'start building'!
It would be good to confirm this one:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=40316
It looks like Zhen Junjie applied two patches to fix NSS cross-compilation on
Master [0]
Maybe master and core-updates have diverged
Hi Steve,
On 24/04/2024 07:08, Steve George wrote:
Hi,
We're trying to stabilise and merge core-updates, help definitely wanted!
I'd love to help! Any of these issues novice-friendly?
Will there be a point release after core-updates is merged?
Kind regards,
Christina
Hi,
We're trying to stabilise and merge core-updates, help definitely wanted!
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70456
So far the main blockers are:
- guile-rsvg failing
- https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=70537
- I'm able to build librsvg@2.56.4 but not guile-rsvg
Hi Felix,
> Someone once gave me this service [1] to mount a file-system declared
> with (mount? #f). [2] It's been working ever since.
Thanks! I know custom services can be made that can work on a
case-by-case basis. I was curious about the value of encapsulating that
logic within an
On 2024-04-22 16:40, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> TL;DR :
>> - patch series in big progress, not done yet because I don't really
>> know where to stop and massive rebuilds.
>
> Please take a look at the python-team branch, which contains changes to
> the build system.
I'll rebase on it, thanks.
On 2024-04-21, 08:35 -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> It may be better, however, to finally fix Guile's 'system' and
> 'system*' to work with 'with-output-to-string'. [2]
Hi Felix,
Thanks for getting back to me.
Great point re potentially fixing this further up in the "chain",
i.e. in Guile. I'll
Adam writes:
> As I see, first guix pull running too long for a lot of people.
Note that this is not due to download speeds but often due to
compilation. When updating Guix you are not just fetching new data, but
a new version of Guix itself (which happens to come with a library
encoding
On Wed, Apr 03 2024, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> It's been Guix policy to let people choose whether to install or not TLS
> root certificates and which one to their machine. While I applaud the
> idea to have the users make a conscious decision about it, in practice I
> suppose very few of us
>From a computational perspective, downloading tarballs is much simpler than
>fetching from Git.
But Git offers so many advantages, and computing has become so inexpensive,
that it's become very common to use Git instead.
Recent Git implementations have optimized serving of specific Git
Ian Eure writes:
> The change is mentioned in the channel news, but it says nothing about
> needing to remove that part of the config.
You are right; I have added more explicit instructions as commit
e5c0ea22e68cc8d6f99957295bc9198afb8455df.
Users should see it when they guix pull again.
Fabio Natali writes:
> For what it's worth, I put together a micro-patch and sent it over as a
> follow-up to #70451.
Pushed as 67a3a83170c038d2eb084d3f53a7ea7b033aea74.
Thank you!
Regards,
Florian
Hello Guix!
I wonder what is the proper usage of square brackets in change logs.
According to
https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs square
brackets are used for conditional changes, the name of the condition is
specified inside '[ ]'. However looking over the commit
Hi Attila,
On 4/22/24 9:04 PM, Attila Lendvai wrote:
This should allow grub to recognise your filesystem during the
installation process. I think using a later version of grub would fix
this, but that hasn't happened yet. I think there's a patch to upgrade
it in `core-updates` somewhere, but
Hi Richard,
On Mon, Apr 22 2024, Richard Sent wrote:
> NFS is allegedly supported
Someone once gave me this service [1] to mount a file-system declared
with (mount? #f). [2] It's been working ever since.
Kind regards
Felix
[1]
Hi Maxim, Ludo’, and everyone,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:52 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>>
>> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>>
>>> It was pointed to us that the "Free and Open Source Software
>>> Sustainability Fund" [0] is currently
Hi Guix!
I wanted to ask the Guix community for their thoughts on improving the
support for adding networked file systems to an operating-system
declaration.
For some context, I started tackling adding CIFS support to file-system
declarations, but I've hit a snag. CIFS is a networked file
heyall!
I've been working on a large bootloader subsystem rewrite to get
everything working together nicer and support future bootloaders
better. however, extlinux is being a bit of an issue.
extlinux installs its second stage (ldlinux.sys) by copying it into the
root (or boot) filesystem, and
Pushed as b8ccbc942e0ec7baf695d383e575991289c6e033.
Thank you for trudging on through the list.
Regards,
Florian
> This should allow grub to recognise your filesystem during the
> installation process. I think using a later version of grub would fix
> this, but that hasn't happened yet. I think there's a patch to upgrade
> it in `core-updates` somewhere, but I'm not sure.
grub seems to be still v2.06
We're working through a list of feedback one item at a time:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-01/msg00117.html
We have completed the first four items.
The next item reported is:
#+begin_quote
3.8 Installing Guix in a Virtual Machine
L25 in an vm should be in a vm
#+end_quote
Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> It was pointed to us that the "Free and Open Source Software
>> Sustainability Fund" [0] is currently receiving applications. The fund
>> aim to sponsors free software projects for their
>>
Hi,
Markku Korkeala writes:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote:
>> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build
>> system (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still
>> have quite a lot of old packages that don't build with
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Graves writes:
[...]
> TL;DR :
> - patch series in big progress, not done yet because I don't really
> know where to stop and massive rebuilds.
> - WDYT about tweaking the build-system for pytest?
> - not done : tweaking the pypi import to ignore those packages. I've
>
(original message was formatted in rich text, so I decided to resend
it in plain text)
Hi guix!
Recently I used nixos on one of my machines. And I noticed people
there use tar balls for fetching package definitions. And It worked
much faster for me.
That was surprising and I decided to write this
Hi guix!
Recently I used nixos on one of my machines. And I noticed people there use
tar balls for fetching package definitions. And It worked much faster for
me.
That was surprising and I decided to write this letter.
Is git the right tool for getting new package definitions? What if git
commits
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 01:47:49PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Steve George skribis:
> >
> >> On 10 Apr, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> To be clear (but I guess it’s crystal clear to anyone who’s been around
> >>>
> TL;DR :
> - patch series in big progress, not done yet because I don't really
> know where to stop and massive rebuilds.
Please take a look at the python-team branch, which contains changes to
the build system.
--
Ricardo
Answer in two different emails.
On 2024-04-18 22:07, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Graves via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
> distribution." writes:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> On some languages, there are a lot of unused native-inputs that are
>> development &
Hi,
On ven., 19 avril 2024 at 16:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> We should see how that fits into the set of tools we already have, in
> particular the (guix derivations) interface and the REPL meta-commands.
>
> My gut feeling, with a Schemer bias, is that we’d rather enrich the
> Scheme API
Hi,
On mer., 17 avril 2024 at 05:21, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix
wrote:
> I've just pushed, as b47ae1ecc43baaf726701ab2d2f810ecfaa75428,
Cool! Thank you for crossing the finish line.
Cheers,
simon
Hi Ludo'
On Fri, Apr 19 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> that’s already possible with the #:user argument of ‘command’.
While 'command' works and was in your initial example, I had trouble
tracking down the documentation for it. Is it a record entry destined
for 'shepherd-command'?
Spoiled by
On 2024-04-20, 11:06 +0100, Fabio Natali wrote:
> I'll send an update here.
Hi Maxim,
There's a couple of mentions of 'nss-certs' in the manual that might be
rephrased to reflect '65e8472a4b6fc6f66871ba0dad518b7d4c63595e'.
For what it's worth, I put together a micro-patch and sent it over as a
Dear Felix et al,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 08:54 AM, Felix Lechner via \"Development of GNU Guix
and the GNU System distribution.\" wrote:
> Hi Ludo'
>
> On Fri, Apr 19 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Is it not hanging during Shepherd service upgrade?
>
> Yes, thank you! It was hanging during
On Fri, Apr 19 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Is ‘shepherd’ among your channels?
Sorry, it works fine.
My message was borne from a terrible desperation after one of my most
important machines refused to reconfigure for a week. As so often with
technical systems, it was an operator error. [1]
No, this is not a bug. specification->package always returns the latest
version of a package and has no way of knowing what variable(s) that package
object is bound to.
On April 21, 2024 8:02:50 AM PDT, Felix Lechner
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, Apr 20 2024, Ian Eure wrote:
>
>> If an
The change is mentioned in the channel news, but it says nothing about needing
to remove that part of the config.
On April 21, 2024 1:32:38 AM PDT, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)"
wrote:
>Hello Ian. My understanding of the nss-certs etc/news.scm item had been
>that we should remove
Hi Ludo'
On Fri, Apr 19 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Is it not hanging during Shepherd service upgrade?
Yes, thank you! It was hanging during the Shepherd system upgrade due
to an invalid calendar-event specification. In a service that uses both
#:days-of-month as well as #:days-of-week, I
Hi Fabio,
On Sat, Apr 20 2024, Fabio Natali wrote:
> do you think it might be worth to add it (or a variation thereof) to
> '(guix build utils)'?
I use this [1] which gives the caller access to the exit status and is
also slightly shorter:
(define (command-with-output-to-string/status*
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 20 2024, Ian Eure wrote:
> If an operating-system’s packages includes `(specification->package
> "nss-certs")', this causes breakage, because that form selects version
> 3.98, but %base-packages includes 3.88.1, which causes an error on the
> next `guix system reconfigure' due to
Hi Ada,
I very much appreciate your detailed response.
For a moment I thought my email hadn't made it to this list, both because it
didn't show up, and the lack of acknowledgment. After a day or so, I filed a bug
report instead [1] - which produced the expected acknowledgement... Still
Zheng Junjie writes:
Hi Junjie,
> I have been granted commit access.
Yay!
> You might know me, Past few years I fix some error on riscv64, fix some
> cross-compilation, Add plasma-desktop, etc. I'm using this access to
> better improve these.
Welcome and keep up the good work!
Greetings,
Zheng Junjie writes:
> hello!
>
> I have been granted commit access.
>
> You might know me, Past few years I fix some error on riscv64, fix some
> cross-compilation, Add plasma-desktop, etc. I'm using this access to
> better improve these.
That's great, thank you for the work and looking
Hello Ian. My understanding of the nss-certs etc/news.scm item had been
that we should remove (specification->package "nss-certs"), which became
unnecessary and clutters config.scm. From what you write, this was
actually not intended, but it is still not a bug IMHO.
(I’m not involved with the
hello!
I have been granted commit access.
You might know me, Past few years I fix some error on riscv64, fix some
cross-compilation, Add plasma-desktop, etc. I'm using this access to
better improve these.
Here is my account:
https://savannah.gnu.org/users/Z572
https://mastodon.social/@Z572
Hi Franz,
On 4/19/24 2:24 PM, Franz Geffke wrote:
I'm having trouble installing guix in qemu, using a "fresh" guix ISO.
```
building
/gnu/store/byjlc85abyjc3fjj9z982677skmda7ib-module-import-compiled.drv...
building
/gnu/store/psw8xn9qpsjjnrqmjrfv0v3jj9fphq5m-module-import-compiled.drv...
I think the first step would be to target openjdk 9, since it already
introduces quite a lot of changes compared to java 8. To do it, I would suggest
to change the default jdk in the ant-build-system and maven-build-system, and
see what is broken, if it can simply be updated without breaking
Congratulations!
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi comrades,
>
> Zheng has joined the committers to help improving cross-compilation,
> riscv64, and KDE, among others.
>
> Let's wish them a warm welcome!
>
> Happy hacking!
--
Retrieve my PGP public key:
gpg --recv-keys
Hallo,
I noticed this capture-stdout wrapper procedure while reviewing Tomas'
patch 68289⁰:
,
| (define (capture-stdout . prog+args)
| (let* ((port (apply open-pipe* OPEN_READ prog+args))
| (data (get-string-all port)))
| (if (= 0 (status:exit-val (close-pipe port)))
|
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Baines writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> What’s the status of ‘core-updates’? What are the areas where help is
>> needed?
>>
>> I know a lot has happened since the last update¹, which is roughly when
>> I dropped the ball due to other commitments, but I’m not
Hello,
I’m following up on this since discussion since it’s been a month
and I haven’t heard any updates.
Summarizing the situation:
- SHF has an opaque, difficult, and undocumented process for
handling name changes. I’s like to stress again that this is
*not* strictly a transgender
Some recent nss-certs changes have a negative side effects which
needs to be fixed.
A patch of mine was pushed recently (commit
0920693381d9f6b7923e69fe00be5de8621ddb6f), which adds nss-certs
3.98 to (gnu packages certs), under the nss-certs-3.98 variable.
Then, commit
Efraim Flashner writes:
Currently if you were to pull in rust-rand-0.8 and rust-rand-0.7
then
you'd have both rand-0.*.crate files in the registry but only
one of
them would be listed in share/cargo/registry/index/ra/nd/rand. I
need to
adjust the generation of that file to combine multiple
I'm having trouble installing guix in qemu, using a "fresh" guix ISO.
```
building
/gnu/store/byjlc85abyjc3fjj9z982677skmda7ib-module-import-compiled.drv...
building
/gnu/store/psw8xn9qpsjjnrqmjrfv0v3jj9fphq5m-module-import-compiled.drv...
building
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:37:30PM +0200, Julien Lepiller wrote:
> Currently, most java packages use the implicit jdk from the build system
> (ant- or maven-build-system), which is… icedtea@8. We still have quite a lot
> of old packages that don't build with openjdk9, so I'm not sure when we can
Hi comrades,
Zheng has joined the committers to help improving cross-compilation,
riscv64, and KDE, among others.
Let's wish them a warm welcome!
Happy hacking!
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> What’s the status of ‘core-updates’? What are the areas where help is
> needed?
>
> I know a lot has happened since the last update¹, which is roughly when
> I dropped the ball due to other commitments, but I’m not sure where we
> are now.
I haven't really been
On 2024-04-19, 11:25 -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Could you please take a look at
> '65e8472a4b6fc6f66871ba0dad518b7d4c63595e', which I hope didn't leave
> no longer useful 'nss-certs' doc/examples behind ?
Hi Maxim, absolutely, I should be able to give a look today or
tomorrow. I'll send an
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 22:56:13 +0200 pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote ---
> Hello Matt, pushed as 86fb0e039bf30cf85e2066401f9a384427c47ea8.
>
> I was bold enough to retain the xref change in (Setting Up the Daemon)
> prompted by Ludo, because starting a sentence with @xref is
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:09:53 +0200 Ludovic Courtès wrote ---
> Hi Florian and all,
>
> I figure you’ve been doing a lot of review and writing of the manual.
> Should we create a documentation team, of which you could be a honorary
> member? :-)
>
> I feel like ensuring doc
> The systemd documentation contains code to implement sd_notify without
> using libsystemd at
> https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/devel/sd_notify.html#Notes
>
> Lennart Poettering said on Mastodon that the notify protocol is stable
> and is independent of libsystemd.
>
>
Hello Matt, pushed as 86fb0e039bf30cf85e2066401f9a384427c47ea8.
I was bold enough to retain the xref change in (Setting Up the Daemon)
prompted by Ludo, because starting a sentence with @xref is recommended
in the Texinfo manual and its examples, while @pxref at the start of a
phrase is not
Hi Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> It was pointed to us that the "Free and Open Source Software
> Sustainability Fund" [0] is currently receiving applications. The fund
> aim to sponsors free software projects for their
> maintenance/organisational activities.
Nice! You forgot the link but
Hey Juliana,
Juliana Sims skribis:
> As some of you already know, in December I submitted an application
> for an NLNet grant to fund porting our beloved Shepherd to Spritely
> Goblins [1]. This work would represent a radical evolution in the
> capabilities of not just Guix's system layer, but
Hi,
Felix Lechner via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System
distribution." skribis:
> I can no longer reconfigure a system with any of these methods:
>
> 1. "guix deploy" which I use almost exclusively
> 2. "guix system reconfigure" after a recent pull
> 3. "./pre-inst-env guix system
Hi Felix,
Felix Lechner skribis:
> Following podiki's and jab's kind advice on IRC yesterday, I recompiled
> Guix locally. I also provided all channels locally via -L.
>
> That 'system reconfigure' failed too, however. The error message was:
>
> Module named (shepherd-package) has no
Hi,
Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> skribis:
> On 2024-04-10 17:17:27 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Yes, why is that? At first sight, that’s because ‘extra-special-file’
>> does things at activation time; there’s no check happening at
>> configuration time.
>>
>> It was really meant for
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Florian and all,
>
> I figure you’ve been doing a lot of review and writing of the manual.
> Should we create a documentation team, of which you could be a honorary
> member? :-)
Yes, please add this team for documentation. I agree and would like to
be in that
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Florian and all,
>
> I figure you’ve been doing a lot of review and writing of the manual.
> Should we create a documentation team, of which you could be a honorary
> member? :-)
>
> I feel like ensuring doc consistency, be it regarding the content,
>
Hi Fabio,
Fabio Natali writes:
> Hi,
>
> Here's my attempt at adding 'nss-certs' to '%default-packages'.
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2024-04/msg01187.html
>
> I've removed the 'nss-certs' entry from the installer, as suggested by
> Ludo, and I've updated the docs,
1 - 100 of 64328 matches
Mail list logo
