Fwd: Greens/EFA internship

is fairly short unfortunately. Best wishes, Alex SASSMANNSHAUSEN Alexander-Carlos writes: > The Greens/EFA in the European Parliament are looking for a paid intern to > work with the IT Project Manager of the group. > > The intern will work in the office of the project manager and

Re: New backward incompatible version of Guile Config

Hi Ludo, Hope you're good :-) Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Alex! > > Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: > >> To this end, in the attached patch, I add a new variable for 0.5. My >> intention is to have 0.4.2 and 0.5 coexist for a while and then to >> swi

New backward incompatible version of Guile Config

0.4.2 and 0.5 coexist for a while and then to switch fully to 0.5 in due course. Is this an acceptable way of doing a gradual transition to a backwards incompatible version of the library? Best wishes, Alex From fadba5c1c27d96b8e49dcf987eb3c09a2bbb0776 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex

Re: Call for 1.2 installer testing.

Hello, Here a positive installation experience: I did my usual bare metal installation of the image linked below on a ThinkPenguin laptop that has always worked pretty well with Guix. Ran through the graphical installation, going through configuration options that have caused problems in the

Re: Running service migrations during upgrades

Hi Marius, Your work and thoughts on the SQL upgrades are very interesting. After the last FOSDEM I wrote up some thoughts about service states and their backups that you may find interesting. https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-02/msg2.html Unfortunately I have not found

Re: generate commit messages for package updates

Hi Ricardo, Just used your committer tool for the first time and it's bloody lovely. Thank you for sharing it :-) Alex Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Guix, > > I’m currently working on upgrading all Bioconductor packages to the 3.11 > release. The hardest work here is to write commit messages

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Heya On Sat, 11 Apr 2020, 00:38 Ludovic Courtès, wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: > > > After successfully completing system setup from the ISO using that > > selection, rebooting the system launches GDM OK. Signing in to GDM > > however

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Heya Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi! > > Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > >>> * Esperanto language/layout crashes the installer. >> >> Fixed by 1a24df44347629cd67821d672edad7636404f293 on master. >> >> Ludo, you may want to cherry-pick it to 1.1.0 branch :) > > Done! > > Thanks for testing & fixing,

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Hello, A minor useability issue: At the end of installation, a prompt suggests installation is complete and that the system is ready for reboot. However, it suggests one can remove the installation medium before hitting return to restart. For me at least, removing the pendrive prior to reboot

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Hello! I have spotted a further issue — though I'm not sure whether this thread is the right place to report it: One is able to select ratpoison as the only option in the desktop environment options in the installer. After successfully completing system setup from the ISO using that selection,

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Great, thank you for that summary, I think that is right. I've noticed a further (small?) error: On installation completion an error flashes up. When I checked /var/log/debug, the message is: …localhost shepherd[1]: system-error("rmdir" "~A" ("Directory not empty") (39)) Best wishes, Alex

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Hi Mathieu, Thanks for getting back to me! Mathieu Othacehe writes: > Hello Alex, > > Thanks for your feedback! > >> Then the screen flashes back to the beginning of the installer. Running >> through the process again results in the disk drive not being available >> for partitioning. > > Are

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

when choosing Esperanto) or fixed (when Choosing English/UK). After this the installation seems to be going swimmingly. Hth, Alex Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Running the graphical installer from the installation image hosted > through IPFS, I can report the foll

Re: 1.1.0rc1 available for test!

Hello, Running the graphical installer from the installation image hosted through IPFS, I can report the following experience: The guidance, keyboard configuration & partitioning works well. In fact all goes charmingly until the stage where the sysconf is shown. That looks correct too.

Re: Using the Hetzner Cloud

Heya, Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Hello Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > >> Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > > [...] > >>> could you please share that "guix-infect" script? >> >> Sure, please see attached. This one here is a bash s

Re: Using the Hetzner Cloud

Heya, Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Hello Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > > [...] > >> Now I use a different approach: deploy a debian server then use a >> guix-infect style script (gleaned from the guix deploy code for digital >> ocean). > >

Re: Using the Hetzner Cloud

Hello, Ellen Papsch writes: > Hi, > > Am Montag, den 17.02.2020, 14:47 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Brielmaier: >> Hi folks, >> >> as promised on the Guix Days in Bruxelles I asked Hetzner[0] if they >> could provide us some free VMs in their cloud[1]. >> >> […] >> >> What do you think about it? >>

Thoughts on stateful services in Guix

Hello, As a result of FOSDEM conversations today I felt inspired to put some thoughts on paper about an area where I think we currently run into complications. Not sure if it is appropriate to write this blog-post-ish contribution here, but as I don't have a blog, and it's about Guix

Re: Maintainer (no longer) needed for Linux-libre and IceCat packages

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Ludovic, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: >> Thanks for your message. As discussed privately, I’m sad to see you go, >> and as co-maintainer I can only say you’re welcome back anytime you want. > > Thank you Ludovic, and thanks to all for the kind words. In

Re: Guix Data Service - September update

Christopher Baines writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> That would be great. In the end, it seems to be that there are quite a >> few services we could build around the Data Service. I’m not sure how >> they should interact. >> >> For instance, Mumi could talk to data.guix.gnu.org over an

Re: GSoC 2019 Recap

Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > Hi Jakob, > > I've already said this off-list, but I feel it's worth repeating > on-list: thank you for making "guix deploy" a reality. So many of us > have wanted it for so long, but you did the really important thing: you > put in the work, and clearly

Re: Inscrutable error when using “guix deploy”

Hi Ricardo, as no one has responded yet, I'd figure I'd share my 2¢. On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, 16:23 Ricardo Wurmus, wrote: > Hi, > > I’m using this deployment file: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > (use-modules (sysadmin build-machines) >

Re: bug#36878: guix system reconfigure broken

Thanks for reporting this, I experienced the same issue but blamed it on my own infrastructure instead! Good to hear it's resolved now. Alex Robert Vollmert writes: > Hi, > > it appears that commit 5c8c8c455420af27189d6045b3599fe6e27ad012 > > guix system: Reimplement 'reconfigure’. > >

Re: “Towards Guix for DevOps”

Hello, I just wanted to drop a quick note on the guix deploy work carried out by Jakob. I've started using it to manage servers, and it seems to work an absolute charm. Congratulations to all involved. I did hit the following small stumbling blocks: - When first running guix deploy it

Re: GNU Guix 1.0.0 released

宋文武 writes: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> We are thrilled to announce the release of GNU Guix 1.0.0! >> >> This 1.0 release is a major milestone for Guix. It represents 7 years >> of hard work with more than 40,000 commits by 260 people, 19 releases, >> and an equally amazing amount of work

Re: New library: guile-wikidata

Hi Swedebugia, This looks pretty cool! Congrats on getting this far :-) I would love to be able to have a nice high-level library to introduce Wikipedia info in my programs, so please continue! Alex swedebu...@riseup.net writes: > Hi > > I worked hard for a few hours playing with guile and

Re: New detailed troubleshooting section in the manual

Good to hear it wasn't just use then... I guess maybe we should clarify the documentation. Alex On Sat, 10 Nov 2018, 15:48 Laura Lazzati It worked :) > Thank you! > > Regards! > Laura > > >

Re: New detailed troubleshooting section in the manual

Hello, On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, 20:54 Laura Lazzati Hi Ludo > > Following these instructions should make the warnings go away, >> doesn’t it? >> > No they don't. I installed the package, exported the path, added it to my > .profile file but the message still appears. > And if I check `env | sort`,

Re: Patch submission should not imply agreement to policy (was Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?)

Thanks for your answers. I'm glad to hear that there might be room for some form of dialogue on wording. Cheers! Alex Thorsten Wilms writes: > On 31/10/2018 09.58, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> Out of curiosity, would you personally feel better about the CoC if it >

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

After this email I'm done with the conversation. I have tried to provide you with evidence. You make it clear you have a bone to pick with people concerned with gender equality. This will go around in circles. HiPhish writes: > There is a common pattern in all the links you provided: 1) only

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

Hello, I agree with Ricardo's email that really we should be discussing the CoC in relation to specific patches against it, to avoid circular debate. So I will only respond to the specific bit directly asking me to provide evidence. HiPhish writes: > On Monday, 29 October 2018 12:08:56 CET you

Re: Patch submission should not imply agreement to policy (was Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?)

Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Wilms writes: > [...] > > Likewise, contributing to Guix is apparently meant to imply that one > makes the pledge as outlined in that CoC. > > In both cases, you are meant to not get one without the other. It > happened that one could not read the EULA in advance and it

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines? (-> convivenza)

Hello, Nils Gillmann writes: > I have followed most of the breaking threads, and I will keep > my contribution to simply stating what a friend wrote: > > https://mobile.twitter.com/lynXintl/status/1055146900100390913 > > In essence this refers to convivenza, which in my opinion > is a much

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

Hello, Gábor Boskovits writes: > I have a feeling that I might confuse some things, as this thread is > getting rather long, so let me summarize what I have on my mind so > far: > > 1. There is general consensus that having both CoC and GKCG is pointless. > 2. CoC is not welcome by all, mainly

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

Thorsten Wilms writes: > On 28/10/2018 13.33, Gábor Boskovits wrote: >> 1. There is general consensus that having both CoC and GKCG is pointless. > > ACK > >> 2. CoC is not welcome by all, mainly because they feel that it >> discourages contributions. > > That's a somewhat limited and tame take

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Wilms writes: > On 29/10/2018 09.23, Björn Höfling wrote: >> Example: Sage Sharp left the kernel development: >> >> https://sage.thesharps.us/2015/10/05/closing-a-door/ >> >> How good would have been the USB 3.0 driver now, or the >> community documentation, when he would

Re: Promoting the GNU Kind Communication Guidelines?

Hello, I strongly support the CC and a specific CoC. Just to put my cards on the table. HiPhish writes: > I have had two packages merged, which I guess that makes me technically a > contributor, so here is my takes on the issue. > > In my opinion Codes of Conduct (or CoCs in short) are one of

Re: Regards from Outreachy applicant

On Sun, 7 Oct 2018, 21:50 Laura Lazzati, wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My name is Laura and I am applying for the outreachy program. > > I have already introduced myself in the IRC channel, but I am also > doing so here. > > I'm an Information Systems Engineer from Argentina, who graduated with >

My compliments to the chef…

Heya, I just wanted to, as an end user, say that the new colourful & more silent output of Guix is amazing. It looks so much less stressful! :D Well done to all involved for getting this in! Cheers, Alex

Re: FOSDEM 2019 (ACTION: please register or mail)

I'm in. On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, 11:23 Pjotr Prins, wrote: > Who wants to come to a separate 2 day GNU Guix event? > > That is the Thursday Jan 31st and/or Friday Feb 1st right before > FOSDEM. I.e., 4 days of hacker nirvana. > > FOSDEM is really great. Look at last year's schedule for Saturday > >

Re: Web interface pushed

Wow, that looks beautiful! Congratulations to all involved, and especially Tatiana :D Alex Clément Lassieur writes: > Hi, > > amirou...@hypermove.net writes: > >> Hi >> >> How can I test? > > On https://cuirass.lassieur.org:8081/ for now, and on > https://berlin.guixsd.org/ when Ricardo guix

Re: FOSDEM 2018 and announcing a GNU Guix/Guile day! After getting home...

Hello, It sounds like the event was absolutely amazing — I'm well jealous of everyone who was able to go! Ludovic Courtès writes: > That alone could justify pursuing the same approach in the coming > years, IMO. At the same time, a devroom at FOSDEM proper is a good > way to reach out to new

Re: Dinner in Brussels?

Unfortunately I won't be able to make it and won't be able to help organize either. It sounds like a great crowd though, so I'm jealous I'll be missing it! Alex Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > To those going to the Guix workshop in Brussels this Friday: who’s in > for dinner (+

Cancellation for Friday's event

Hello, Unfortunately due to unforeseen work pressures I won't be in Brussels over the Fosdem weekend. I'm gutted, but I'll have to miss the first ever Guix fringe conference too! I hope you all have an amazing time! Best wishes, Alex

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Hey, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Hi Alex, > >> I have read through the documentation and I believe I would be able to >> commit to the duties of being a mentor / co-mentor. > > Wonderful! > >> I would be happy to send more details of where I believe my relative >> strengths and weaknesses in this

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Hi pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) writes: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 12:53:37PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> A second step might be a simplified Guile build system, which does not >> rely on autotools infrastructure. I believe this was discussed in

Re: Call for project proposals: Guix and Outreachy

Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > on behalf of the Guix community I submitted an application for this > project to participate in Outreachy, an internship project for people > from sections of the population that are commonly underrepresented in > the world of free software development. > >

Re: 01/01: gnu: Add guile-dsv.

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver writes: > alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com (Alex Sassmannshausen) writes: > >> atheia pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit e9291eaa427066e5c8e531acc79f34d93dc845f0 >> Author: Alex Sassmannshausen <a...@p

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-dsv.

Hi Ludo, Thanks for the review, I've pushed it with the changes you proposed. Cheers, Alex Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-dsv): New variable. > > [..

[PATCH] gnu: Add guile-dsv.

* gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-dsv): New variable. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 51 ++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm index abcefd32e..b94ffa754 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm +++

Re: Using IPFS to host mirrors of source packages

Pjotr Prins writes: > By hosting source packages on IPFS they become content addressable and > should scale for downloads. It would also become a safe way of > distributing data. > > https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs > > Essentially the interplanetary file system allows for distributed > storage

Re: Trouble with circular module dependencies (Re: 01/02: gnu: Add ncurses-with-gpm.)

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> FWIW, I would like to see us work to eliminate all cyclic module >>> dependencies in Guix, by splitting up our package modules as needed so >>> that they form a directed acyclic

Re: Unprivileged /gnu/store with PRoot

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello Guix! > > In hostile environments (read: machines that lack Guix and where you’re > [...] > > Pretty cool no? :-) … Very cool! I once again stand gob-smacked :-D Alex

Re: backup w/ duplicity borg attic bup?

Hello, myglc2 writes: > I am looking for a command line de-duplicating backup tool. I will be > using it between GuixSD, Guix/GNU/Linux, and MacOS. > > Based on what I see in gnu/packages/backup.scm and in https://brew.sh, > duplicity, borg and attic seem like they could be good choices. > > I

GNU Hackers Meeting 2017 call for presentations!

Hello! The GNU Hackers Meeting is looking for presentations for this years programme! Find out all you need to know, and/or submit your proposal at https://www.gnu.org/ghm/programme.html . The deadline for submissions is 4 June 2017. The meeting will take place 24 - 27 August in Germany. The

Re: GuixSD on servers… has someone used Hetzner dedicated servers before?

ng0 writes: > "We are the Guix. Your biological and technological distinctiveness will > be added to our own. Resistance is futile." Excellent… :-)

Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd.

Heya, Thank you all for your advice! I can confirm that the builds were successful locally. On the back of this I will push to master later this evening. Cheers, Alex Kei Kebreau writes: > Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi Ben, >>

Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd.

Hi Ben, Ben Woodcroft writes: > Hi, > > > On 24/03/17 18:13, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> Hi Kei, >> >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>> This series of packages builds and lints fine for me. There are over 200 >>> dependent packages that

Re: [PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd.

Hi Kei, Kei Kebreau writes: > Alex Sassmannshausen <alex.sassmannshau...@gmail.com> writes: > >> * gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-file-pushd): New variable >> --- >> gnu/packages/perl.scm | 28 >> 1 file changed, 28 insertion

[PATCH 18/26] gnu: perl-test-simple: Update to 1.302078.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-simple): Update to 1.302078. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index c0ae3ea2c..e007f0cac 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 21/26] gnu: perl-variable-magic: Update to 0.61.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-variable-magic): Update to 0.61. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 5eb5e8992..3752f5679 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 20/26] gnu: perl-time-duration-parse: Update to 0.13.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-time-duration-parse): Update to 0.13. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 5c6525c22..5eb5e8992 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 12/26] gnu: perl-moose: Update to 2.2004.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-moose): Update to 2.2004. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index f702dff73..fd8a66d4c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 09/26] gnu: perl-devel-overloadinfo: Update to 0.004.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-devel-overloadinfo): Update to 0.004. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 7cdb610c0..0a8359729 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 24/26] gnu: perl-cpan-meta-yaml: Update to 0.018.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-cpan-meta-yaml): Update to 0.018. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index c6c3a9f06..235bafc32 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 26/26] gnu: perl-scalar-list-utils: Update to 1.47.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-scalar-list-utils): Update to 1.47. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 1882ececa..82c4ef5d1 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 10/26] gnu: perl-devel-partialdump: Update to 0.18.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-devel-partialdump): Update to 0.18. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 0a8359729..d3f14a8a0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 22/26] gnu: perl-yaml: Update to 1.23.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-yaml): Update to 1.23. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 3752f5679..5ffe6d48a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@ -7914,7

[PATCH 25/26] gnu: perl-parse-cpan-meta: Update to 2.150010.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-parse-cpan-meta): Update to 2.150010. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 235bafc32..1882ececa 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 19/26] gnu: perl-test-warnings: Update to 0.026.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-warnings): Update to 0.026. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index e007f0cac..5c6525c22 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 13/26] gnu: perl-package-deprecationmanager: Update to 0.17.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-package-deprecationmanager): Update to 0.17. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index fd8a66d4c..418a25e7c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 23/26] gnu: perl-cpan-meta-requirements: Update to 2.140.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-cpan-meta-requirements): Update to 2.140. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 5ffe6d48a..c6c3a9f06 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 05/26] gnu: perl-class-load: Update to 0.23.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-class-load): Update to 0.23. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index fef17bbd0..179e3d1f1 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 17/26] gnu: perl-test-exception: Update to 0.43.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-exception): Update to 0.43. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index cf02cad66..c0ae3ea2c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 16/26] gnu: perl-test-cleannamespaces: Update to 0.22.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-cleannamespaces): Update to 0.22. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 10 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 90f0d386c..cf02cad66 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 14/26] gnu: perl-params-validate: Update to 1.26.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-params-validate): Update to 1.26. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 418a25e7c..f77d7a297 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm

[PATCH 06/26] gnu: perl-clone: Update to 0.38.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-clone): Update to 0.38. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 179e3d1f1..16b53adef 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 07/26] gnu: perl-common-sense: Update to 3.74.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-common-sense): Update to 3.74. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 16b53adef..d63614e2a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 08/26] gnu: perl-cpan-meta-check: Update to 0.011.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-cpan-meta-check): Update to 0.011. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index d63614e2a..7cdb610c0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 11/26] gnu: perl-module-runtime-conflicts: Update to 0.003.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-module-runtime-conflicts): Update to 0.003. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index d3f14a8a0..f702dff73 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 15/26] gnu: perl-sub-name: Update to 0.21.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-sub-name): Update to 0.21. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index f77d7a297..90f0d386c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 01/26] gnu: Add perl-file-pushd.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-file-pushd): New variable --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 086e1fae0..4944ceb2a 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 04/26] gnu: perl-capture-tiny: Update to 0.46.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-capture-tiny): Update to 0.46. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 97655a646..fef17bbd0 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/perl.scm @@

[PATCH 03/26] gnu: perl-b-hooks-endofscope: Update to 0.21.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-b-hooks-endofscope): Update to 0.21. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index ce2c59e4c..97655a646 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

[PATCH 02/26] gnu: Add perl-test-needs.

* gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-test-needs): New variable. --- gnu/packages/perl.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/perl.scm b/gnu/packages/perl.scm index 4944ceb2a..ce2c59e4c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/perl.scm +++

Re: Being excellent to one another

Hello, I'm trying to draw this thread to a close as I genuinely believe that neither side intends malice: - John genuinely does not see how his statements can very easily be interpreted as highly disrespectful and even mocking - myself and others genuinely do not want to bear down on individuals

Re: Introducing ‘guix pack’

Excellent article, thanks for writing and sharing! Alex Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi again! > > I’ve written about ‘guix pack’ here: > > https://gnu.org/s/guix/news/creating-bundles-with-guix-pack.html > > Thanks to rekado & jonsger on IRC for the quick review! > > Ludo’.

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 11:17:28AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > Perhaps we have to agree to disagree on singular they, but I hope we can > still agree on the following statements from my earlier email: > > I agree to a sligh

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:57:04AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > > > ... and yes. If an individual specifically requests to be referred to > by > > a partcular set of pronouns I will attempt to do so, but may > o

Re: Being excellent to one another

John Darrington writes: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 07:57:07PM -0700, dian_ce...@zoho.com wrote: > On Sun, 19 Mar 2017 17:40:27 -0500 > Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > > The important thing is to not assume someone's preferred pronouns > > without

Re: FOSDEM social dinner

obias, Christopher >> Baines, Manolis, Ludo, Ricardo, Matias and myself. >> >> Let me know if I missed you, or if you have questions! >> >> For now, until then :-) >> >> Alex >> >> >> Alex Sassmannshausen writes: >> >> &

Re: FOSDEM social dinner

, Amirouche, Efraim, Tomáš, Thomas, Tobias, Christopher Baines, Manolis, Ludo, Ricardo, Matias and myself. Let me know if I missed you, or if you have questions! For now, until then :-) Alex Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Guile has a dev room at FOSDEM this year — for a

Re: It’s building!

Kei Kebreau writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello Guix! >> >> Good news: the new machine, bayfront.guixsd.org, is building Guix master >> for x86_64/i686 with Cuirass⁰! >> >> You can get substitutes from https://bayfront.guixsd.org; just authorize >> its key (with ‘guix

[PATCH 0/1] Add Guile-ICS

.0" ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /home/alex/.guix-profile/lib/guile/2.0/site-ccache/ics/streams.go failed: ;;; ERROR: In procedure make_objcode_from_file: bad header on object file: "GOOFLE-8-2.0" Subject: [PATCH 0/1] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Alex Sassmannshausen (1): gnu: Add Guile-ICS. gnu/packages/guile.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) -- 2.11.0

[PATCH 1/1] gnu: Add Guile-ICS.

* gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-ics): New variable. --- gnu/packages/guile.scm | 28 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/guile.scm b/gnu/packages/guile.scm index 9458ab714..c6d8fd8e8 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/guile.scm +++

FOSDEM social dinner

Hello, Guile has a dev room at FOSDEM this year — for a whole day! The dev room will be on Sunday. Whilst organising it, we had the idea that it would be fun to have a Guile/Guix user & dev dinner on the Saturday evening. I'm hereby officially opening registration for that :-D I have not

Re: Remove duplicates in AUTHORS file before the release

Alex Kost writes: > Hello, if it's not too late for the release, I think it would be good to > adjust ".mailmap" to avoid duplicates in the generated AUTHORS file (if > it's too late, it would be good anyway). > > As you can check with "git --no-pager shortlog -nse", there are some > duplicates

Re: [PATCH] doc: Mention "guix pull" during installation.

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> I've recently gave an explanation of why I think using `guix pull` >> before installing GuixSD should not be recommended unconditionally: >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2016-11/msg00047.html >>

Re: FOSDEM 2017 Schedule is there!

Pjotr Prins writes: > Check it out K.3.201 - looks awesome! > > https://fosdem.org/2017/schedule/day/saturday/ Indeed, most excellent! Looking forward to this greatly :-) Alex

Re: [PATCH] Generate multiple paginated packages pages.

Heya John Darrington writes: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:29:22PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > > Note that I removed the all-in-one package page because the poor CVS > > server at gnu.org simply can???t handle it. > > Sure ??? I fig

  1   2   3   >