seen a copy of the unmodified program. That's not a strict
requirement, but it's a strong hint.
So please proceed with caution.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
oesn't look to me as good as standing against violence to the point of
intervening when you witness it.
I hope this makes sense to you,
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinfor
On May 6, 2021, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>> recipes as to the possibilities of getting to the GNU Linux-libre
>> sources from it, how to verify signatures, etc
> I for one have not seen them. Would you mind making them available
> somewher
o generate tarballs on the fly, and published digital
signatures based on archives generated this way, I presume an
expectation that changes to the format won't be made without a very
compelling reason.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Fre
squashfs for the bulk
of the data in the install media for a future release.
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very
ur
feedback towards making them available to the public at large.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hackerhttps://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injus
Hello, Mark,
On Aug 25, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Aug 15, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> If I were to implement this, what would you suggest I do if the patches
>>> fail to apply
>>
>> Look at the conflict pr
using the guix build recipe
and default kernel config for the bisection, but rather a smaller config
built within the bisect tree.
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I'm sure that's not what you intend, but this arrangement, plus your
>> mention of hurriedly getting releases out, a
On Aug 15, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>> I also consider it unwise for all of us, as a matter of habit or policy,
>>> to trust the integrity of the computer systems used by the Linux-libre
>>&g
ake up for
disregarding the procedures that would have warned you of avoidable
issues, whether or not they turn out to be actual freedom issues.
The other reason you got much lower results than me was that I made room
for your recipe's lagging for up to 2 releases (thus the 5% of stable
releases requiri
On Aug 15, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>>
>>>>> It may be useful for users with newer hardware devices, which are
>>>>> not yet well supported by the latest stable release, to us
g 15, 2020, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> No. There are much better (faster and less risky) ways to tend to that
>> requirement, see #bisecting below.
> [...]
>> #bisecting
>>
>> You can even take one of our releases and apply the patches that
ially about major security issues, and our main workhorse has
limited capacity, we end up at about one hour per release anyway, having
them all ready at about the same time.
(Compression of tarballs then takes another half hour or more per
release, but the releases are pushed to the git release archive long
before compression is completed)
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker
https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist
GNU Toolchain Engineer
aking this
step ;-)
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter he/him https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
Be the change, be Free! FSF Latin America board member
GNU Toolchain EngineerFree Software Evangelist
Hay que enGNUrecerse, pero sin perder la terGNUra jamás - Che GNUevara
ered by the end of the month, to jump into this right away; I
wanted to, in order to use guix to deliver the speech, but I doubt I'm
going to be able to make the jump in time ;-(
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter he/him https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
Be the change, be Free! FSF Lat
Hello, Giovanni,
On Jun 30, 2019, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> wellcome to Guix!
Thanks!
> Alexandre Oliva writes:
> Guix is "just" not able to activate/assemble LVM volumes at boot
Ok, that doesn't sound too hard to fix. (famous last words ;-)
> Device mapper i
(quite
> easy setup).
The term "substitute server" doesn't sound familiar to me. From what
you suggest, I guess that's a Guix concept related with offloading
system rebuilds to it, is that so?
> I wish you the best of luck with GuixSD!
Thanks!
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom figh
to get started,
but... the machines I use are not very powerful, as in, laptops old
enough as to support LibreBoot, so I haven't used virtualization much
myself.
Thanks in advance for any guidance. I'm lxo on IRC.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter he/him https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
e it's Free, or at least some of the
remaining tasks can be checked off.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo
Be the change, be Free! FSF Latin America board member
GNU Toolchain EngineerFree Software Evangelist
Hay que enGNUrecerse, pero sin
19 matches
Mail list logo
