Potential security issue with make authenticate and mitigation

Hi Guix-ers, Please see the below message (and attached report for further details) of a potential security issue and mitigation in Guix, from Skyler Ferris. The very short version: 'make authenticate' is a potential attack vector, which can be mitigated by using 'guix git authenticate' in a

Re: Sustainability fund application ongoing

Hi Maxim, Ludo’, and everyone, On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 01:52 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi Ludovic, > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> Hi Maxim, >> >> Maxim Cournoyer skribis: >> >>> It was pointed to us that the "Free and Open Source Software >>> Sustainability Fund" [0] is currently

Re: System can no longer be reconfigured

Dear Felix et al, On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 08:54 AM, Felix Lechner via \"Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.\" wrote: > Hi Ludo' > > On Fri, Apr 19 2024, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Is it not hanging during Shepherd service upgrade? > > Yes, thank you! It was hanging during

Re: bug#63267: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Hi everyone, Apologies for the long delay on this. On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:07 PM, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to > gcc-toolchain. Well, quoting the comment: > > ;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to

Recent security issues (guix-daemon and xz)

tions. I hope otherwise everyone is having a great weekend and that your Guix machines (and all the others!) are humming along happily! John Kehayias

Re: Backdoor in upstream xz-utils

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJRBAEBCgA7FiEEpCB7VsJVEJ8ssxV+SZCXrl6oFdkFAmYHK0sdHGpvaG4ua2Vo YXlpYXNAcHJvdG9ubWFpbC5jb20ACgkQSZCXrl6oFdkFRA//WaJMegtHd88wlq0V QovAYD7+d6zj5DxgVTiGKXckyKWx7AceVJ0WVp9MB+WxU8dEXepEnd9AHOA4v/Fb

Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small

024 um 21:38 + schrieb John Kehayias: >> [...] >> 1. Essentially squash to one commit where all of vulkan is updated in >> one commit. The main upside is that nothing should break (within >> vulkan, dependents to be fixed as needed) and it shows as "one" >&g

Re: doc: installation: fix ~root confusion (was Re: doc: Removing much of Binary Installation)

Hi vagrant, On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 9:58 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > On 2024-03-10, Suhail Singh wrote: > > > Vagrant Cascadian vagr...@debian.org writes: > > > > > but "guix pull" does not update the running guix-daemon; > > > > Just to be clear, however, if one were to do

Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small

Hi everyone, And sorry for reviving an old thread, but I am faced with a similar issue for updating vulkan, with the patch series submitted by dan (cc'ed): . I thought I would get some opinions here, please see below: On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:51 PM,

Re: Packaging Hyprland

Hi Efraim, On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 12:42 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 10:32:29PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> Slightly off topic, but for anyone wondering about my emacs keys issue: >> >> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 04:01 PM, John Kehayias wrote: >&g

Re: Packaging Hyprland

Hi everyone, Just a note on cairo below: On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:39 AM, Hilton Chain wrote: > Hi everyone, > > On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:32:27 +0800, > Lucy Coleclough wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 20:48, hutzdog wrote: >>> [snip] >>> # New Patches >>> The following new patches will

Re: Packaging Hyprland

Slightly off topic, but for anyone wondering about my emacs keys issue: On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 04:01 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > Seems xremap can do it (which we have packaged) except it doesn't > pick up different applications for where keys apply on Hyprland. I > do miss in Stump

Re: Packaging Hyprland

Hi Hutzdog, On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 01:20 AM, hutzdog wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been working on moving over to GNU Guix recently, and have hit a Welcome to Guix! (For the first part, not the roadblock part...) > roadblock: there is no package for Hyprland (the one WLRoots based > compositor

Re: Update to source-highlight seems to have broken rust

Hi Kaeylyn, On Monday, January 29th, 2024 at 12:26 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > > > Hi Efraim and guix-devel, > > Based on my local cuirass instance and some spot testing this morning, it > appears the change to source-highlight in commit 367bc2d198 has broken the > build of rust 1.73. > * `guix

Re: update darktable version

Hi Alex, On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:15 PM, Alex Devaure wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Thank you for your answer. I created the issue #68293 and the > modification is now on master branch. > Best regards, > Alex > Looks like Vinicius Monego already did the update in

Re: Commit Access: Sharlatan Hellseher

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 07:56 PM, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > > Hi Guix! > > I am happy to have been granted commit access and I am ready to help > review pending issues and prepare queued packages for GNU packages in > astronomy. I would like to concentrate on the packages covered by the > Go,

Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:32 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 05:43:40AM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Forgive the top post and please see below/previous messages for >> previous updates. >> >> TL;DR: I plan to merge m

Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

I can make a call here. Thanks everyone and hope 2024 is off to a good start! Enjoy the new mesa with curl and xwayland security updates (no new grafts!). John On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:09 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Efraim and guix-devel > > On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:44 AM, Ef

Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

Hi Efraim and guix-devel On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 08:44 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 09:19:27AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:18:50PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2

Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

Hi all, On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 12:57 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Kaelyn and everyone, > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:25 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > >> On Thursday, December 14th, 2023 at 10:21 PM, John Kehayias >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Guix, >>>

Re: xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

Hi Kaelyn and everyone, On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:25 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > On Thursday, December 14th, 2023 at 10:21 PM, John Kehayias > wrote: > >> >> Hi Guix, >> >> In light of (more) CVEs in xwayland, see >> <https://lists.x.org/archiv

Possible to separate out tk from python?

Hi Guix, Quick(?) question if someone happens to know: can we separate out the tk dependency from the python package, for instance by making the tk output of python a separate package? I'm asking because I've realized that it is through tk that python, and thus a good chunk of all packages,

xwayland security updates, to mesa- or core-updates or ?

Hi Guix, In light of (more) CVEs in xwayland, see , with already pending security updates, see , I would like to prioritize getting that fixed in master. The tricky thing is that, according to

Re: bug#67790: New signing key

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:16 AM, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 22:17, John Kehayias wrote: >> And I assume all this was just to use a new key (did I see some >> mention of subkeys on #guix? that's what I use) and not because of >> something bad happening

Re: bug#67790: New signing key

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:10 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:02:33PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Note that I believe you can simply update to your new key yourself. >> You'll want to add your new key to the keyring branch, then adjust the >> .guix-authorizations file

Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch

Guix-ers, On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 08:28 AM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 08:11:08PM +0000, John Kehayias wrote: >> Hi Kaelyn, >> >> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've just s

Re: [PATCH] gnu: xorg-server: Update to 21.1.9.

Dear Kaelyn, On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 08:46 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to bring folks' attention to > which updates xorg-server, including > a number of security fixes. The patch has been pending for about 17 > days now, and while the QA badge reports

Re: Upgrading Guix's security team

Hi Ludo’ and everyone else, On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 07:16 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hello, > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 11:31:41PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > [...] > >>> > If maintainers agree (Cc’d), I invite you to add your name and a >>> > termination

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi, On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:07 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > John Kehayias writes: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Update below: >> >> On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: >> [snippy snip snip] >> >> A

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi everyone, Update below: On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 11:47 PM, John Kehayias wrote: [snippy snip snip] >> >> Happy to! Substitutes will eventually become available, but there's >> quite a few builds to be done. This takes care of some ungrafts and >> updates with I hope

Re: bug#66964: Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch

Hi Kaelyn, On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 08:01 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > Hi, > > I've just submitted a pair of patches for the mesa-updates branch: > updating xorgproto and > xorg-server-xwayland. The xorgproto is a high-impact update (guix > refresh reports rebuilding

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

> Details of changes below, which included some more ungrafting: > >>> Here is a list of what has been on my radar and I'll be looking to >>> apply on the mesa-updates branch. If there's something I missed and >>> you think makes sense here (e.g. lower level graphical/X related >>> libraries)

Re: mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi Maxim and guix-devel, On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:27 AM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi John, > > John Kehayias writes: > [...] > > If you're going to put a branch for it and build it whole, I'd simply > merge it whole after it's done building and hasn't regressed on packag

Re: mesa@23.1.4: missing symbols

Hi Sergio, On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 06:05 PM, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote: > Hi. > > I've noticed that the `mesa' package we provide is missing some > symbols that according to the OpenGL specification should be present on > the `libGL.so.1` library. > I'll put the punchline up top with a few more

Re: Meet Guix at Capitole du Libre in Toulouse, nov. 18-19

On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:39 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Luis Felipe writes: > >> El 26/10/23 a las 14:03, Luis Felipe escribió: >>> El 25/10/23 a las 21:17, Julien Lepiller escribió: The print service I usually use has a lot of options for flyers, {10,15,20,30}*{10,15,20,30}, 12*12,

mesa-updates: call for patches

Hi Guix-ers, Time for another round of Mesa and friends updates! I've been waiting for another Mesa release but seems the 23.2 series has stalled out and now is a good time before 23.3 or 24. I've been using 23.2.1 for some packages locally without issue. I would like to get this branch built

Re: branch master updated: gnu: Add passff.

Hi Clément, On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 05:05 PM, Clément Lassieur wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28 2023, Christopher Baines wrote: > >> This passff-host package looks a bit odd to me, one thing to mention is >> that guix show says it has no dependencies, but I don't think that's >> correct: >> >>

Re: core-updates invites to an ungrafting party

Hi Maxim et al, On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 11:12 AM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello Guix! > > The core-updates branch is still alive, and has accumulated (or plans > to) a few changes that cause world-rebuilds, such as fixes to > git-minimal (bug#65924) as well as docbook improvements (bug#65479)

Re: Fw: Question regarding qmk firmware

Hello, On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 10:34 AM, Ekaitz Zarraga wrote: > Hi > > I want to forward this message to guix-devel because it is a clear > case of some (actually good) technical decision affecting users in > unexpected ways. > > Now, after the change, a user might run `guix search

Re: Need people to help with kernel updates

Hi Leo, On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 02:04 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > Hello, > > For a few years, I've been handling updates of the linux-libre kernel by > myself. Now I want some more people to help with this. > Just wanted to say thanks for this work that goes on mostly behind the scenes; I've

Upgrading Guix's security team

son is full of fun and candy and less CVEs! John Kehayias

Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

Hi Maxim, On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 09:50 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi John, > > John Kehayias writes: > > [...] > >> I'll open a branch merge request issue later today as per new >> procedure for QA. Though I believe that only builds 2 branches, which >&g

Re: Updates for Go

Hi Katherine, On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:12 AM, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > On 8/22/23 8:24 AM, Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the > GNU System distribution. wrote: >> Hi Attila, >> >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:14 AM Attila Lendvai wrote: >>> >>> currently the go build system in

Re: A certain new commiter

On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 01:40 AM, Hilton Chain wrote: > Hello Guix, > > With the commit [1] made hours ago, I have been granted commit access > to Guix repository. > > Currently, I'm maintaining packages I may use and those I've touched, > and for now I have no specific plan to move on. This

Re: The package/inherit trap

Hi all, On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:07 AM, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 22:11, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> However, merely documenting something is not enough when we have the >> chance to fix misleading naming, as we do here. It would be nice to >> have,

Re: poetry not building

Hi all, On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 08:49 AM, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Hi Reza, > >> Poetry is not building on ci.guix.gnu.org [1]. There is a pending patch >> [2] on the issue tracker. What is missing to apply this patch and how >> can I help? > > both contributors to that issue – John and me –

Re: Core-updates merge

Hi Pierre! On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 07:12 PM, Pierre Langlois wrote: > Hi John! > > John Kehayias writes: > >> Bringing back up an old thread, but >> >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 05:55 AM, John Kehayias wrote: >> >>> Dear Andreas and fellow Guix-

Re: Core-updates merge

Hi Felix, On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 09:52 AM, Felix Lechner wrote: > Hi John, > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:37 AM John Kehayias > wrote: >> >> Unfortunately >> I managed to clobber the author line in the git log after editing and >> testing locally, sorry ab

Re: Core-updates merge

Bringing back up an old thread, but On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 05:55 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Dear Andreas and fellow Guix-ers, > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:09 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > [...] >> Each and every package is not yet in shape; please feel free to submit >> pa

Re: Guix's python has pip's user dir in its loadpath

Hi, On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 11:57 AM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi, > > Wojtek Kosior writes: > >> The precedence of local, pip-installed Python libraries over Guix ones >> has already been a source of bugs. And these can be hard to diagnose. > >> I imagine an optimal solution would be to

Re: Transformations Shell Syntax

Hello, On Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 09:54 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > HI, > > John Kehayias skribis: > >> As one who also would like a shorter syntax option, here's a quick >> thought: what about a short version of what we have for when there >> is only one package giv

Re: guidelines for package names (namespaces?)

Hi Andy, On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 01:55 PM, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, in Guix there seems no guidelines for package names/namespaces > although there are conventions like Python packages prefixed with > python-... (good). However, this does not cover cases like Gnome > applications. For example, I

Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

Hello, On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 08:08 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Am Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 09:47:06AM -0600 schrieb Katherine Cox-Buday: >> I disagree with this because it seems like Mesa moves along at a pretty >> brisk pace and I feel like we'd be constantly recreating the same branch: >> 23.1.3,

Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:09 PM, John Kehayias wrote: [snip] > > I'll open a branch merge request issue later today as per new > procedure for QA. Though I believe that only builds 2 branches, which > is occupied at the moment. Or can someone set a separate build job > specif

Re: Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

Hello again, On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 02:10 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi everyone, > > With our move to a branching strategy for patches that require many > rebuilds, I would like to propose a branch for Mesa updates. Based on > how Mesa has been developed the last few year

Re: modifying (rather than fully replacing) a build phases

Hi Csepp, On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:30 AM, Csepp wrote: > > I think I've used assoc-ref to find the build phase I wanted and then > called it from something else. It's not super pretty, but it works. Yes, you can get phases from other build-systems, for instance, which is needed sometimes.

Re: modifying (rather than fully replacing) a build phases

, is there anything better we can/should do? On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:29 PM, John Kehayias wrote: > Hi Guixers, > > A question that is either relatively simple or else getting into the > weeds a bit, that I came across in my proposed patch > <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64213> The general

modifying (rather than fully replacing) a build phases

Hi Guixers, A question that is either relatively simple or else getting into the weeds a bit, that I came across in my proposed patch The general question is: how can I modify a build phase without replacing it completely? More specifically (as seen in the

FreeType Brotli (WOFF font) support; Godot 4

Hi Guix-devel-ers, I have a local patch that updates Godot to (the big and exciting) version 4. Despite the big changes in Godot, besides some larger changes to its package definition, the only external change I came across was in FreeType. Guix's FreeType is built without Brotli support,

Re: Using (recursive #t) in (origin git-reference)

On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 12:33 PM, Felix Lechner via \"Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.\" wrote: > Hi unmatched-paren! > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 11:52 AM ( wrote: >> >> (If you've already tried building it without the RECURSIVE?, then this >> issue will go unnoticed, as

Re: Changes to the branching/commit policy

Hi Chris, On Sat, Jun 17, 2023 at 10:57 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > John Kehayias writes: > >> Thanks for these changes! Question on branches (sorry if this was >> covered in a previous thread, but now that we have new language in the >> manual I figure this i

Branch (and team?) for mesa updates

Hi everyone, With our move to a branching strategy for patches that require many rebuilds, I would like to propose a branch for Mesa updates. Based on how Mesa has been developed the last few years, there should be frequent (roughly a couple of months or quicker) releases that shouldn't be

Re: Changes to the branching/commit policy

Hi Chris, On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:23 PM, Christopher Baines wrote: > > Christopher Baines writes: > >> The changes in #63459 have strayed now in to touching the commit policy >> [1]. My intent was to simplify the guidance by grouping it better, but I >> think the significant change here is

Re: Transformations Shell Syntax

Hello, As one who also would like a shorter syntax option, here's a quick thought: what about a short version of what we have for when there is only one package given or it can be applied to all packages/be a positional argument? An example is perhaps best, so what if we could write: guix

Re: Order of manifest and overlapping binaries

See also https://issues.guix.gnu.org/58859 and linked issues (some already mentioned and most authors on this thread are involved in some/all of these issue reports). I think this all points to the need for some fixes and/or clarity here for the user. (apologies for the top post and formatting

Re: Commit Access: jgart

Welcome and congrats! I've always appreciated your enthusiasm and looking for ways to improve the Guix experience. (apologies for formatting and top posting, email client limitations right now) Original Message On May 16, 2023, 9:28 AM, jgart wrote: > Hi Guixers, Thanks for

Re: Reverting d477018b57 "gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.12."

Hi Tanguy, Original Message On May 24, 2023, 11:48 PM, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote: > Hi John, > Quoting John Kehayias (2023-05-04 17:09:14) > > I didn't emerge in time for the core-updates merge. There might be a better > > way > > than causin

Re: Welcoming Josselin Poiret as a new Guix committer

Welcome Josselin! Another long overdue addition as I've long appreciated your work and frequent discussions on all things Guix. Here's to many patches, bug fixes, and pushes! On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:27 AM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hi Guix, > > I'd like to welcome Josselin among the Guix

Re: Welcome to Simon as a new committer

Yes, congrats and welcome! With all the work you do I had always assumed you were already a committer and we are lucky to have you step up into this role! (On my end I'll be away from a proper computer for 3 weeks but looking forward to a summer of hacking on Guix when I return.) On Thu, May

Re: Mesa vulkan layer path fix for core-updates

Hello, On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 04:40 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > Hi, > > --- Original Message --- > On Tuesday, April 25th, 2023 at 2:15 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > >> Hello Kaelyn, >> >> thanks for your research! > > You're welcome! :) > >> Am Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:07:51PM + schrieb

Re: 04/09: gnu: mesa: Update to 23.0.3.

Hi Christopher and Maxim, On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:41 AM, Christopher Baines wrote: > guix-comm...@gnu.org writes: > >> apteryx pushed a commit to branch master >> in repository guix. >> >> commit 0be7838105806819f4586ec9130382a66a22880e >> Author: Kaelyn Takata >> AuthorDate: Thu May 4

Re: Python feature branch

Hi all, On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:28 PM, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Hi Andreas, > >> I wanted to set up automatic building on cuirass for the Python updates >> branch, but was not sure which one it is: >> $ git branch -a | grep python >> remotes/origin/python-updates >>

Re: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Hi Kaelyn, On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:45 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > --- Original Message --- > I wasn't sure the best place to share it, so I've attached my "run" > script for running the binary download of PolyMC in a container. It is > both a shell script and a guix package manifest, and is

Re: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Hi all, > I have similar use cases of FHS containers to run binaries (primarily > games). I recently ran into the issue of gcc:lib going away and no > output from a visible package providing libstdc++. My current > workaround was to implement a replacement for specifications->manifest > that

Re: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Hi again, On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:19 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Thanks for opening this and cc'ing; this has come up with some > frequency on IRC, especially recently. In discussing there today, the > current reasoning is that usually one will just call g++ which knows > how to

Re: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so

Hi Christopher, On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:05 AM, Christopher Rodriguez wrote: > > Sorry for the spam; Resending this without the bugs address, but with > the issue's address. > > Christopher Rodriguez writes: > >> >> Hello All, >> >> I noticed today that libstdc++.so.1 (and some others), which

Re: Reverting d477018b57 "gnu: poetry: Update to 1.1.12."

Hi Tanguy, On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 09:49 AM, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote: > Hi Guix, > > I noticed yesterday that Poetry was broken: > . > > I might have spotted it earlier if I had spend time testing `core-update`. > My bad! > Yes, I noticed that too

Python feature branch

Python. One brought to my attention recently is <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63044> though I have not looked at it. Thanks! John John Kehayias (20): gnu: Add python-installer. gnu: Add python-pyproject-hooks. gnu: Add python-rapidfuzz. gnu: python-crashtest: Update to 0.4.1. gnu:

Re: Core-updates merge

erged, as a precursor to the team based workflow that we need to invent > (Efraim Flashner). > - R on powerpc64le needs to be built by changes to valgrind and lz4 > (Simon Tournier, I). > - Many Python packages need updates, in particular with the aim of building > python-yubikey-manager

[PATCH] gnu: guitarix: Update to 0.44.1.

isplay more information) > -> task in 'guitarix' failed with exit status 1 (run with -v to > display more information) > -> task in 'guitarix' failed with exit status 1 (run with -v to > display more information) > error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception: > %exception #<

Re: `mumi send-email' means no more debbugs dance to send multiple patches

Hi Arun, On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 04:12 PM, Arun Isaac wrote: > Hi all, > > mumi, the software powering our debbugs frontend at > , now also comes with a command-line > interface. At the moment, the new command-line interface allows > searching for issues, and

Re: python-ledgerblue as input for electrum? (was: Core-updates, the last metres)

Hi, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 04:32 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2023-04-23, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: >> Here are a few leaf packages that don't build because of some >> failing dependencies: >> - blender is blocked by opencolorio >> - electrum is blocked by python-ledgerblue > > Hrm

Re: Core-updates, the last metres

Hi Guillaume, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 08:00 PM, Guillaume Le Vaillant wrote: > John Kehayias skribis: > >> If things continue looking good, are we planning to see the merge in >> the next few days? Any other more leaf packages anyone has noticed >> needs a fix someon

Re: Core-updates, the last metres

Dear Andreas and Guix, On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 09:30 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > yesterday I updated my system to core-updates. Since I am writing this > message now, you can deduce that it succeeded. Well, there is no reason > you should care, but it could encourage you to do the same.

Re: Mesa vulkan layer path fix for core-updates

Hi Kaelyn, Andreas, and Guix! On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 04:07 PM, Kaelyn wrote: > --- Original Message --- > On Wednesday, April 19th, 2023 at 3:26 PM, Andreas Enge > wrote: > >> >> Hello, >> >> thanks for bringing this back to our attention! > > You're welcome! :) Yes, thanks Kaelyn,

Re: Core-updates after the staging merge

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:55 AM, John Kehayias wrote: > Oh, looks like no x86_64 builds currently on Cuirass...hopefully > temporary? > Never mind, builds going through now! Okay, I really must get to bed!

Re: Core-updates after the staging merge

Hi Andreas and Guixers, Again, thanks Andreas for all your work on core-updates! On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:03 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > just a quick update after a night of building on CI. > Things look generally quite good on x86_64; some things are being rebuilt > due to the

Re: A Joyous Core-Updates Week-End 

Hi Guix, On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 12:16 AM, Josselin Poiret wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It's that time of the year again! Merging core-updates! Do you *want* > glibc 2.35, gcc 11 as default, mesa 22, python 3.10, and more?! Here's > your chance! > Time flies! Big thanks to Andreas especially

Re: staging branch merged to master

Hello Maxim, On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 03:29 PM, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Hello, > > The staging branch has been merged to master. > Nice, thanks! > Should we remove the branch from Cuirass and Guix, knowing that teams > is the way going forward? I also agree with this change, yes to branches

Re: Emacs next variants

Hi all, On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:39 PM, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 at 16:04, Cayetano Santos wrote: > >> Fine with me, even if to me emacs-next means latest from master, >> including tree-sitter. You decide to use the feature, or not. > > Just to be sure we are on the

Re: Merging core-updates?

Hi Katherine et al, On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 09:40 AM, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > Efraim Flashner writes: > >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 10:05:40AM +0100, Julien Lepiller wrote: >>> Hi Guix! >>> >>> As discussed at Guix Days before Fosdem, we haven't merged core-updates >>> in a very long time.

Re: Merging core-updates?

Hi guix-devel! On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 03:49 PM, Josselin Poiret wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Andreas Enge writes: > >> I volunteer to follow your lead, but also have no clue what is actually >> expected. > > I would also like to give a hand! > Count me in as well! I only did some spot fixes the

Re: Guix Games Collection

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 09:23 PM, Tobias Platen wrote: > I had submitted a talk for LibrePlanet called "Gaming on a Talos II - > how I avoid using Steam". Unfortunately, there were so many high > quality talks that it was impossible to fit them all in the program. > So I will do a lightning talk

Re: FOSDEM’s coming!

ners with FHS (Filesystem Hierarchy Standard) Support_”](<https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/guixfhs/>) (video - only) will be present the recently-added [`guix shell --container + only) John Kehayias will present the recently-added [`guix shell + --container --emulate-fhs`](<https

Re: Packages grow, no longer fit on a 

Hi all, On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 05:18 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Efraim Flashner skribis: > >> I've made some progress on LLVM and I think I have a working LLVM that >> can be used as an input for mesa. >> >> (ins)efraim@3900XT ~$ du -sch >>

Re: Guix driver paths for icecat RDD sandbox

Hi Jelle and guix, On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 04:37 PM, Jelle Licht wrote: > Hi guix, > > I was playing around tyring to get hardware enabled video decoding > working in icecat and/or firefox in guix, and found out that the fine > folks working on Nix have already gotten a patch upstreamed that

Re: Golang go-updates feature branch?

Hi Leo! and hi Guixers, On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 02:22 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > Hello! > > Now that our build farm is running smoothly, I propose we revive the > practice of feature branches, when appropriate. > Heartily agree here. This has come up a few times on #guix and generally with

Re: Drafting a Guix blog post on the FHS container

Hi Jim, On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 06:07 PM, Jim Newsome wrote: > Thanks, looks good, and the command in your patch also works for me. > Great, thanks for testing! > I agree that passing and exposing XAUTHORITY seems better. Experimentally, > sharing the directory > read-only also works (using

Re: Drafting a Guix blog post on the FHS container

Hi Jim, On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 05:39 PM, Jim Newsome wrote: > Sorry for (presumably) breaking threading; I came across this online and > don't see a way to set my in-reply-to-email header properly. > > Anyways just thought I'd mention that I recently learned about this > feature, and was able

Re: Should Guix support writing CLI Common Lisp scripts? (Think Roswell)

Hi Guixers/Lispers, On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 06:14 PM, jgart wrote: > Hi Guixers, > > Should Guix support writing CLI Common Lisp scripts? (Think Roswell) > >> Although Roswell is a unified interface to Common Lisp implementations, it >> also >> encourages writing scripts with it. >> A "Roswell

  1   2   >