On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:55:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
Attached are several patches addressing cross-compilation issues,
culminating in a large patch affecting lots of files, moving
various inputs to
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 05:55:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
(‘git format-patch’ and ‘git send-email’ can be used for that, as noted
in HACKING.)
I can't find any mention of git send-email in HACKING,
Right.
and
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): [(eq? (%current-target-system) #f)] assign
cross-libc
to the variable glibc
---
gnu/packages/xml.scm |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/xml.scm b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
index e2bab7b..a5b8c78 100644
---
* gnu/packages/base.scm (tzdata): Add source as input.
---
gnu/packages/base.scm |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index 02f1b91..5f74271 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -535,7
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): [(eq? (%current-target-system) #f)] assign
cross-libc
to the variable glibc
No need to show the condition in the log.
--- a/gnu/packages/xml.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/xml.scm
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ things
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
(string-append --prefix= out)
(alist-cons-before
'patch-source-shebangs 'patch-tests
-(lambda* (#:key inputs
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
*gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgpg-error): Added gcc as a native input,
and set the CC_FOR_BUILD variable.
The implicit inputs when cross-compiling include both the cross-gcc and
the native gcc (see build-system/gnu.scm.)
AFAICS setting
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ with the Linux kernel.)
(delete-file-recursively (string-append out
/share/zoneinfo-posix))
(delete-file-recursively (string-append
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
*gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgpg-error): Added gcc as a native input,
and set the CC_FOR_BUILD variable.
The implicit inputs when cross-compiling
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Looks great to me!
Excellent! Here's an updated patch incorporating your suggestions,
and also with the following additional changes:
* Arguments to install and remove are now optional, so --install a b
works without the '='.
* I fixed a bug where
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 06:57:59PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
(string-append --prefix= out)
(alist-cons-before
'patch-source-shebangs
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
Excellent! Here's an updated patch incorporating your suggestions,
and also with the following additional changes:
* Arguments to install and remove are now optional, so --install a b
works without the '='.
* I fixed a bug where --upgrade gcc
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
* gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxml2): [(eq? (%current-target-system) #f)] assign
cross-libc
to the variable glibc
Pushed with minor formatting adjustments, thanks!
Ludo’.
Thanks for auditing all this!
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
* gnu/packages/avahi.scm : Moved dependencies from inputs to
native-inputs
* gnu/packages/cdrom.scm : Moved dependencies from inputs to
native-inputs
Please use standard notation, like:
*
* gnu/packages/openssl.scm (openssl): Move perl from inputs to
native-inputs.
Replace reference to target bash with the native bash or target bash as
appropriate.
---
gnu/packages/openssl.scm |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
From: John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgpg-error): Add gcc as a native input,
and set the CC_FOR_BUILD variable.
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgcrypt): Add libgpg-error as a native input and
set the --with-gpg-error-prefix configure option.
*
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:48:07PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Thanks for auditing all this!
--- a/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gdb.scm
@@ -56,9 +56,10 @@
(gmp ,gmp)
(readline ,readline)
(ncurses ,ncurses)
-
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
However, is --with-gpg-error-prefix really needed? By default the cross
gcc will find the target libgpg-error in its search path, and not the
native one, so I would guess this is OK.
Without --with-gpg-error-prefix
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/openssl.scm (openssl): Move perl from inputs to
native-inputs.
Replace reference to target bash with the native bash or target bash as
appropriate.
Applied, thanks!
Ludo’.
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
From: John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgpg-error): Add gcc as a native input,
and set the CC_FOR_BUILD variable.
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (libgcrypt): Add libgpg-error as a native input and
set the
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/avahi.scm, gnu/packages/cdrom.scm, gnu/packages/cryptsetup.scm,
gnu/packages/curl.scm, gnu/packages/emacs.scm, gnu/packages/fontutils.scm,
gnu/packages/gdb.scm, gnu/packages/geeqie.scm, gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm,
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: Add new configure flag: CC_FOR_BUILD=gcc
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm, gnu/packages/guile.scm,
gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm:
remove CC_FOR_BUILD from these package descriptions.
Applied to the just-reopened
From: John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au
* guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm: Add new configure flag: CC_FOR_BUILD=gcc
* gnu/packages/gnupg.scm, gnu/packages/guile.scm,
gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm:
remove CC_FOR_BUILD from these package descriptions.
---
gnu/packages/gnupg.scm
Hi!
After pulling commit 0c5028f, you’ll should get an error like this when
building:
--8---cut here---start-8---
nix/libutil/hash.cc:244:13: error: member ‘guix_hash_context nix::Ctx::md5’
with constructor not allowed in union
MD5_CTX md5;
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06:49AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Make sure to run ./nix/sync-with-upstream to fix that (this script has
an additional patch rule to fix that.)
When doing this, I get:
sync-with-upstream: `..' is not the valid top-level source directory
When I do cd nix;
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06:49AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Make sure to run ./nix/sync-with-upstream to fix that (this script has
an additional patch rule to fix that.)
When doing this, I get:
sync-with-upstream: `..' is not the valid top-level
Hello!
The check of the crypto part fails with
FAIL: tests/pk-crypto
=
Starting test pk-crypto (Writing full log to pk-crypto.log)
FAIL string-gcry-sexp-string
# of expected passes 6
# of unexpected failures 1
using an older libgcrypt 1.5.3 from Guix; is version
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 06:54:50PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Could you post $top_builddir/{pk-cryto,store}.log ?
Here they are!
Andreas
Starting test pk-crypto
Group begin: pk-crypto
Test begin:
test-name: string-gcry-sexp-string
Test end:
result-kind: fail
actual-value: ((foo
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 06:54:50PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Could you post $top_builddir/{pk-cryto,store}.log ?
[...]
Test begin:
test-name: string-gcry-sexp-string
Test end:
result-kind: fail
actual-value: ((foo bar) \Àÿî\ (genkey \n (rsa
Hi!
So, time has come to refine the road map, and see in more details what
can be done in the next 2–5 months that would lead to something we could
call “1.0”.
I think roughly half of it can be achieved for 0.6 (end of January or
February?).
• distributed builds
(see
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
- a ‘guix archive’ command to easily import/export archives, and to
generate a key pair;
Done in commit 760c60d; see the doc below.
Ludo’.
3.6 Invoking ‘guix archive’
===
The ‘guix archive’ command allows users to export
I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really doesn't
have
much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports.
Wouldn't the module gl.scm be a better location?
J'
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67
From: John Darrington j...@gnu.org
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gtkglext): New procedure
---
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 27
.../patches/disable-disable-deprecated.patch | 36 ++
.../patches/remove-pangox-dependency.patch | 132
From: John Darrington j...@gnu.org
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New procdeure
---
gnu/packages/games.scm | 59
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/games.scm
diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really doesn't
have
much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports.
Wouldn't the module gl.scm be a better location?
Probably yes, although several Xorg
j...@gnu.org skribis:
From: John Darrington j...@gnu.org
* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gtkglext): New procedure
s/procedure/variable./
gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 27
.../patches/disable-disable-deprecated.patch | 36 ++
j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New procdeure
Looks good to me, will push along with v2 of the other one.
Ludo’.
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New variable
---
gnu-system.am |1 +
gnu/packages/games.scm | 59
2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/games.scm
diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/gnu-system.am
index
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:05:22PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
I wondered why mesa is defined in the module xorg.scm since it really
doesn't have
much to do with X, other than X is one graphics system it supports.
Wouldn't the
The driver dependencies on mesa are probably correct.
The history is interesting: X11 of course predates OpenGL. X11 provides a 2D
graphics system. OpenGL provides a 3D system. Early OpenGL implementations
for
*nix like systems used the X11 primitives for their implementation. This was
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm: Remove variable mesa
gnu/packages/gl.scm: Add variable mesa
---
gnu/packages/gl.scm | 62 +
gnu/packages/xorg.scm | 59 +-
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 58
Hello,
gnutls as currently packaged for guix, the gnu system, issues the following
warning at configuration:
*** libunbound was not found. Libdane will not be built.
I tried to build libunbound, but it depends on SSL, which I take to
mean openssl. If this is true, then gnutls with dane support
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Also, please add them to gnu-system.am.
Thanks for the reminder. Why didn't I get an error when I ran make ?
It just didn’t build that file, which doesn’t
On 2013-12-28 Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr wrote:
gnutls as currently packaged for guix, the gnu system, issues the following
warning at configuration:
*** libunbound was not found. Libdane will not be built.
I tried to build libunbound, but it depends on SSL, which I take to
mean openssl.
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubik): New variable
Pushed, thanks!
Ludo’.
Hi, Niels,
Thanks for the quick feedback!
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
libspki/lsh supports password-protected keys, with a specific sexp
format, whereas libgcrypt doesn't.
About this format, one known problem (if it is a
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
We're using SPKI-style signatures and ACLs in Guix now, to determine
whether to authorize the import of an archive of binaries (I say
SPKI-style because we don't use your libspki, just libgcrypt and a
bunch of higher-level sexps taken from the SPKI RFCs
Where does a package definition go to build a local package with Guix:
/nix/store?
I'm not sure that I understand the question correctly.
Package definitions reside in gnu/package/*.scm The packages themselves, once
built, get automatically put into /nix/store.
J'
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:55:59PM -0500, Kete wrote:
Where does a package definition go to build a local
Thanks for the explanations!
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/xorg.scm: Remove variable mesa
gnu/packages/gl.scm: Add variable mesa
Pushed. Several modules that expected ‘mesa’ to be in (gnu packages
xorg) had to be adjusted.
A simple way to find about unbound
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 04:56:18PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
A simple way to find about unbound variables like this is to run ‘make
clean-go make’ via Emacs M-x compile and to iterate over the
warnings.
Thanks. I didn't know about that.
J'
--
PGP Public
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Sure, but again, all we have is a small subset of SPKI, and no
delegations.
I think spki gets really interesting once you have delegations. I intend
to add that to lsh, for both user and host keys. But it's been some years
without any progress on that
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubg): New variable
---
gnu/packages/games.scm | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/games.scm b/gnu/packages/games.scm
index 746ca49..0f5ae41 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/games.scm
+++
ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Sure, but again, all we have is a small subset of SPKI, and no
delegations.
I think spki gets really interesting once you have delegations. I intend
to add that to lsh, for both user and host keys. But it's
John Darrington j...@gnu.org skribis:
* gnu/packages/games.scm (gnubg): New variable
Pushed, thanks!
Ludo’.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 07:37:26PM -0500, Kete wrote:
make ./pre-inst-env guix build pkg-name
Thanks, what do you do with the scm (Scheme) package definition file? Does
it
play a part in that? Do we place it in the current directory?
The .scm file usually stays in the
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 01:52:35 PM you wrote:
The .scm file usually stays in the directory gnu/packages/
If you mean http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/, then
how do I contribute to the project?
guix download is a convenience function for package developers.
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:09:18 PM John Darrington wrote:
When it's ready rpPost a patch to the list. Ludovic will commit it to the
repository (if he likes it).
This is my problem. How do I know if it works if I can't test it by building
the package?
Thanks
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:32:35AM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 05:09:18 PM John Darrington wrote:
When it's ready rpPost a patch to the list. Ludovic will commit it to
the
repository (if he likes it).
This is my problem. How do I know if it works
On Wednesday, January 01, 2014 08:55:07 PM John Darrington wrote:
the
pre-inst-env file should exist in your build directory (after you have built
guix of course)
If I finish this process, maybe somebody could use the instructions.
The location of pre-inst-env was one of my earlier
Am I supposed to add a module to gnu-system.am?
Yes, here’s an example [1].
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by `all-
am'. Stop.
I’ve just tried the following. Could you do the same and report any
issues?
$ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
$ cd
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:50:25 AM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `gnu/packages/zsh.scm', needed by
`all-
am'. Stop.
Sorry, I totally misunderstood the context. Are you trying to add Zsh?
It seems you added a line to ‘gnu-system.am’ but forgot to
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:58:47 PM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
Hm, I’m a bit puzzled. How did you change ‘gnu-system.am’, then?
gnu-system.am was at the top level. I didn't have a packages folder in my gnu
dir.
Did you clone the repository or download the tarball? If not, could you
On Thursday, January 02, 2014 06:44:00 AM Nikita Karetnikov wrote:
$ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/guix.git
$ cd guix
$ ./bootstrap ./configure --localstatedir=/nix/var make make check
(See ‘HACKING’ for more information.)
Then you could add a recipe (i.e., the definition of a
On Friday, January 03, 2014 06:50:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
This would suggest that you haven't got a guix daemon running.
Install guix and set up the daemon as described in Chapter 2 of the GUIX
manual.
Thanks, here are the results:
gnu/packages/zsh.scm:12:2: warning: possibly
Thanks, here are the results:
gnu/packages/zsh.scm:12:2: warning: possibly unbound variable `mit'
The license is like MIT.
guix build: error: zsh: unknown package
I guess it would be easier to help if you provide the code.
pgpy4oI5TndsZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kete k...@ninthfloor.org skribis:
On Friday, January 03, 2014 06:50:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
This would suggest that you haven't got a guix daemon running.
Install guix and set up the daemon as described in Chapter 2 of the GUIX
manual.
Thanks, here are the results:
Hi!
And happy new year to everyone, where applicable! :-)
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
After a while I run guix package -i guix which installs just fine.
(Note that there’s little point in doing that since it gives you the
same version that you just installed. If
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:23:57PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi!
And happy new year to everyone, where applicable! :-)
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
After a while I run guix package -i guix which installs just fine.
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
So so sum up, my suggestions are:
1. Either a) remove --localstatedir=/var from the configure-flags of the
definition of guix in package-management.scm;
No, because the setup here is as we (will) use it in the stand-alone GNU
system,
On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 08:10:56PM -0500, Kete wrote:
On Friday, January 03, 2014 04:19:26 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
It is called ‘x11’ (to avoid ambiguity with other licenses originating
from MIT) in the (guix licenses) module. So you would write
(define-module
On Saturday, January 04, 2014 08:15:40 AM John Darrington wrote:
The example in bash.scm is over complicated. Look at some of the examples
in xorg.scm to see how to set configure-flags.
That got me a little further.
Src/../Src/mkmakemod.sh: line 467: /bin/sh: No such file or directory
On Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:47:06 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I’d recommend looking at how that tcsetpgrp check is implemented, to see
what makes it think it doesn’t work. In particular what does
‘config.log’ report about this test?
I didn't find any mention.
The ‘license’ field should
This is where you have to start doing some detective work and probably some
patching!
Based on what you pasted, it looks as if CONFIG_SHELL isn't getting passed to
the mkmakemod.sh file.
Probably the zsh devs have done something wierd.
What I do at this stage is to build with the -K flag, then
Kete k...@ninthfloor.org skribis:
On Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:47:06 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
I’d recommend looking at how that tcsetpgrp check is implemented, to see
what makes it think it doesn’t work. In particular what does
‘config.log’ report about this test?
I didn't find any
starting phase `build'
cd . autoconf
/nix/store/97vnvqq5daji73b71v4cnmyaa7r3hzk2-bash-4.2/bin/sh: autoconf: command
not found
Makefile:371: recipe for target 'configure' failed
make: *** [configure] Error 127
phase `build' failed after 0 seconds
$ guix package -I
autoconf2.69out
Kete k...@ninthfloor.org skribis:
starting phase `build'
cd . autoconf
/nix/store/97vnvqq5daji73b71v4cnmyaa7r3hzk2-bash-4.2/bin/sh: autoconf:
command not found
Makefile:371: recipe for target 'configure' failed
make: *** [configure] Error 127
phase `build' failed after 0 seconds
Where
On Monday, January 06, 2014 01:56:00 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Where does this build log come from?
Apparently the log above comes from a build, i.e., something run in the
build environment (chroot, etc.)
Yes, this comes from './pre-inst-env guix build zsh'.
What’s installed in the users’
Kete k...@ninthfloor.org skribis:
On Monday, January 06, 2014 01:56:00 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Where does this build log come from?
Apparently the log above comes from a build, i.e., something run in the
build environment (chroot, etc.)
Yes, this comes from './pre-inst-env guix build
Hello, and best wishes!
As discussed before [0], Guix needs to provide users with translated
package synopses and descriptions. It gets its synopses and
descriptions for GNU packages from the Womb [1,2] (so does GSRC, IIRC),
and has its own for non-GNU packages.
There’s gettext infrastructure
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/*checkout*/gnumaint/pkgblurbs.txt
Looking at www/server, it seems there are currently some translations
of the blurbs for ru, fr, de, ja (just judging by file sizes).
I suggest the path of least resistance is to take these web translations
as the source for
Packages which have a GUI, also need a .desktop file, which contains
two translatable strings: GenericName, and Comment. For example,
here is the .desktop file from pspp:
[Desktop Entry]
Name=GNU PSPP
GenericName=Statistical Software
GenericName[ca]=Programari estad??stic
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
Packages which have a GUI, also need a .desktop file, which contains
two translatable strings: GenericName, and Comment. For example,
here is the .desktop file from pspp:
[Desktop Entry]
Name=GNU PSPP
GenericName=Statistical Software
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 07:19:03PM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
Hello,
I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel.
Running the following:
guix package --verbose -i tar
I get the error:
guix package: error: build failed: unable to fork: Operation not permitted
I traced the error to the clone() operation in build.cc. As mentioned by
Ludovic in a
Hello,
Omar Tarabai tara...@devegypt.com skribis:
I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel.
Running the following:
guix package --verbose -i tar
I get the error:
guix package: error: build failed: unable to fork: Operation not permitted
I traced the error to the clone()
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 11:17:35AM +0100, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
John Darrington j...@darrington.wattle.id.au skribis:
I think the most desirable approach is to encourage package
maintainers, to
append the
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello,
Omar Tarabai tara...@devegypt.com skribis:
I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel.
Running the following:
guix package --verbose -i tar
I get the error:
guix package: error: build
Omar Tarabai tara...@devegypt.com skribis:
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hello,
Omar Tarabai tara...@devegypt.com skribis:
I have Guix 0.5 installed on a fedora 14, 2.6.32 kernel.
Running the following:
guix package --verbose -i tar
I get
On 01/09/2014 02:57 PM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote:
Ineiev via RT web-translat...@gnu.org skribis:
If there are other (non-web) translators, we may want to arrange a cron job
to commit their translations to www.
There would likely be duplicated work if there were both www and non www
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote:
No, I'm suggesting that it's possible to delegate the work to groups
other than GNU web translators (especially when we have no active
team for a language), and www.gnu.org can take advantage of it.
I agree - and
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote:
No, I'm suggesting that it's possible to delegate the work to groups
other than GNU web translators (especially when we have no active
team for a language), and www.gnu.org can take advantage of it.
I agree - and
Omar Tarabai tara...@devegypt.com skribis:
No luck with setcap either. Its possible that since planetlab nodes we are
using are running on linux-vservers
http://www.linux-vserver.org/Paperwhich is an operating system-level
visualization and perhaps it applies
some restrictions on the user
Ineiev via RT web-translat...@gnu.org skribis:
I think it can be organized this way:
(0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www
translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files;
(1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send
a
On 01/10/2014 03:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote:
(0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www
translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files;
(1) when a new translation is submitted to TP, the translators send
a copy to the respective
Ineiev via RT web-translat...@gnu.org skribis:
On 01/10/2014 03:12 AM, Ludovic Courtès via RT wrote:
(0) when a new (or corrected) translation is committed to www, www
translators send updates to TP, and they merge it to their PO files;
(1) when a new translation is submitted to
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:44:25AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote:
Then, there are also tts (which may translate into something
different, like code or em) and a few other substitutions [1].
I wonder whether it would be easier if guix used HTML in PO files and
converted it to
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:44:25AM -0500, Ineiev via RT wrote:
Then, there are also tts (which may translate into something
different, like code or em) and a few other substitutions [1].
I wonder whether it would be easier if guix used HTML in PO files and
converted it to
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
The good news is that, with a bit of work in (guix nar),
‘substitute-binary’ will be able to use that mechanism too. So we can
change Hydra to always sign its archives (simple), and
‘substitute-binary’ to
401 - 500 of 64579 matches
Mail list logo
