Hi,
Thanks for all the thoughtful input.
We think we have worked out a preferred path - ironically from a
closer reading of the linux.scm - once we had some familiarity with
Guile.
We think (with doubts we'll elaborate on):
1. All config files and any such files should go in a folder
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:24 AM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Begley Brothers Inc writes:
>
> > > You can either put your config files in a separate git repository and
> add
> > > that to
> > > the native inputs, or you can include the config files in your channel
> > > repository (or later in Guix
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:17 AM Efraim Flashner
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:40:53AM +1000, Begley Brothers Inc wrote:
> > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:55 PM Ricardo Wurmus
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > [+guix-devel, -gnu-linux-libre]
> > >
> > > > We are now looking to build
Begley Brothers Inc writes:
> > You can either put your config files in a separate git repository and add
> > that to
> > the native inputs, or you can include the config files in your channel
> > repository (or later in Guix itself).
> >
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. That gives some
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:40:53AM +1000, Begley Brothers Inc wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:55 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > [+guix-devel, -gnu-linux-libre]
> >
> > > We are now looking to build Linux kernels using Guix instead of Yocto.
> > We
> > > can't see any reason
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:55 PM Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [+guix-devel, -gnu-linux-libre]
>
> > We are now looking to build Linux kernels using Guix instead of Yocto.
> We
> > can't see any reason why the builds wouldn't be linux-libre. Ideally we'd
> > like our effort to be accepted by
Hi,
[+guix-devel, -gnu-linux-libre]
> We are now looking to build Linux kernels using Guix instead of Yocto. We
> can't see any reason why the builds wouldn't be linux-libre. Ideally we'd
> like our effort to be accepted by upstream guix.
[…]
> We'd appreciate any pointers to package
