Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> OK with these changes!
>
> Thanks. I performed the requested changes (including a fix to
> “reset-timestamps” to include directories). Pushed as 5f7a1a4.
>
> ~~ Ricardo
Thank you. I will re-write the clojure patch using ant-build-system.
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>> OK with these changes!
>
> Thanks. I performed the requested changes (including a fix to
> “reset-timestamps” to include directories). Pushed as 5f7a1a4.
Great to see this. Thanks!
> OK with these changes!
Thanks. I performed the requested changes (including a fix to
“reset-timestamps” to include directories). Pushed as 5f7a1a4.
~~ Ricardo
Awesome package. Thanks Ricardo, we will use it.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:17:59PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
> > Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> >
> >> Ludovic Courtès writes:
> >>
> The
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>>> The build.xml it generates contains a target “touch” which is run before
>>> wrapping up the compiled .class files in a jar archive; this target
>>> ensures that the timestamps of all archived
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> The build.xml it generates contains a target “touch” which is run before
>> wrapping up the compiled .class files in a jar archive; this target
>> ensures that the timestamps of all archived files are reset, so the
>> produced jars can be (and in case of
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> I’ve used it successfully to package the Java projects hamcrest-core,
> junit, osgi-annotation, osgi-core, log4j-api, and javax-mail.
Nice.
> It’s especially useful in cases where a project does *not* use Ant and
> would otherwise require
Hi Guix,
this patch adds a new build system for Java projects: the
“ant-build-system”.
I’ve used it successfully to package the Java projects hamcrest-core,
junit, osgi-annotation, osgi-core, log4j-api, and javax-mail.
It’s especially useful in cases where a project does *not* use Ant and
would
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
Attached is yet another version that I intend to push. I added some
more comments as to why gnu-build-system is used
I think this is overkill.
The package is now named ant, because I don't provide another more
fully featured
Andreas Enge writes:
Then, please push! This is indeed very useful for me.
Attached is yet another version that I intend to push. I added some
more comments as to why gnu-build-system is used and why tests are
disabled in two places. Typos have been fixed as well.
The package is now named
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 02:54:54PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
I already packaged ant-minimal with only the most basic features
enabled, as most additional features depend on libraries that need ant
in order to build them. Here's the latest version of my patch to add
the ant-minimal
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 05:13:36PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
I'd prefer to leave it public for now because it's the only variant of
Ant we have at the moment. I encourage anyone more versed in Java stuff
to continue where I left off and provide a more featured variant of Ant.
Okay. Maybe
Andreas Enge writes:
indeed, I was a bit confused since I remembered discussions about ANT_HOME,
which led me to believe that it had made it into the distribution. Please
do not hesitate to send out a ping if you do not get a reaction to a patch!
The priority of Ant dropped quickly when I
Ludovic Courtès writes:
According to the docs[1],
ANT_HOME is used by the launcher script for finding the
libraries. JAVA_HOME is used by the launcher for finding the
JDK/JRE to use.
So, it would indeed make sense to modify the launcher script
(whichever this is, probably
Ricardo Wurmus ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de skribis:
* to use Ant without problems ANT_HOME and JAVA_HOME really should be
set appropriately (ANT_HOME to $out of the ant-minimal package,
JAVA_HOME to $out of icedtea6). Should I suggest these two paths as
search paths by adding
* to use Ant without problems ANT_HOME and JAVA_HOME really should be
set appropriately (ANT_HOME to $out of the ant-minimal package,
JAVA_HOME to $out of icedtea6). Should I suggest these two paths as
search paths by adding something like this to ant-minimal (for
ANT_HOME) and
Ricardo Wurmus ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de skribis:
this patch adds ant-minimal, a minimal configuration of Apache Ant. Ant
can be configured with lots of optional libraries, but since most of
these libraries are built with Ant, I think it makes sense to provide a
minimal version.
Yes.
A
Hi Guix,
this patch adds ant-minimal, a minimal configuration of Apache Ant. Ant
can be configured with lots of optional libraries, but since most of
these libraries are built with Ant, I think it makes sense to provide a
minimal version.
A wart is that Ant (even in the minimal configuration)
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
this patch adds ant-minimal, a minimal configuration of Apache Ant. Ant
can be configured with lots of optional libraries, but since most of
these libraries are built with Ant, I think it makes sense to provide a
minimal version.
A couple more things:
* the
19 matches
Mail list logo