Andreas Enge writes:
>
> No idea. The only difference I saw with my setup is that you have the
> #:mapped-devices clause in the initrd; I am just using this:
>
> ;; Add a kernel module for RAID-10.
> (initrd (lambda (file-systems . rest)
> (apply base-initrd
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 12:12:02PM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
> Thanks, I tried that. the 'guix system reconfigure' succeeds and starts
> the raid array (please see system35.scm & system35.log, attached).
>
> But the reboot hangs at:
>
> [...] clocksource: Switched to clocksource tsc
No idea. The
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 07:05:25PM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
>> > I might write a more detailed blog post about this; there is a little
>> > subtlety with the non-automatic determination of dependencies between
>> > devices, so one needs to make sure that the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 07:05:25PM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
> > I might write a more detailed blog post about this; there is a little
> > subtlety with the non-automatic determination of dependencies between
> > devices, so one needs to make sure that the partitions to be assembled
> > are present
Andreas Enge writes:
> the attached patch adds RAID support to our mapped device mechanism.
>
> To give more explanation:
> Like for LUKS devices or file systems, the RAID itself needs to be created
> during installation, after booting from the USB key:
>mdadm --create
Hi Andreas,
Ludo's response clarified a lot of things for me. The only remaining
feedback I have is that (1) to aid the reader, you should consider
adding a cross-reference from "(guix) Mapped Devices" (in the part where
you mention that certain modules must be added) to "(guix) Initial RAM
Hello!
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 10:43:58PM -0700, Chris Marusich wrote:
> Cool! Is it possible to use them in combination? Using the example
> From the documentation, would it possible to use LUKS to create an
> encrypted /dev/mapper/home which uses /dev/md0 instead of /dev/sda3?
unfortunately
Hello,
Chris Marusich skribis:
> Andreas Enge writes:
[...]
>> + #~(let ((every (@ (srfi srfi-1) every)))
>
> Can't you just use "every" on its own? It looks like you've imported
> the srfi-1 module earlier on.
I’m the one who suggested it as a
Andreas Enge writes:
>> How do you plan to address mdadm and grub config?
>> Will you be booting from RAID?
>
> the attached patch adds RAID support to our mapped device mechanism.
Cool! Is it possible to use them in combination? Using the example
From the documentation,
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:25:47AM -0400, myglc2 wrote:
> How do you plan to address mdadm and grub config?
> Will you be booting from RAID?
the attached patch adds RAID support to our mapped device mechanism.
To give more explanation:
Like for LUKS devices or file systems, the RAID
10 matches
Mail list logo